...others, like former Vice President Joe Biden, face big questions about how ambitious an agenda they will lay out while balancing the needs of organized labor.
Posted on 06/01/2019 10:40:09 AM PDT by Libloather
Democrats across the ideological spectrum want their party to dedicate one of its presidential primary debates to climate change — despite the risk of exposing their own divides.
At least five presidential candidates have backed fellow presidential contender Jay Inslee's idea for a climate-centric debate, in a sign of the issue's growing profile among Democratic voters.
But a public debate might also force Democratic contenders to confront policy differences they have so far papered over, including how quickly they would push the U.S. to shift away from the fossil fuels that provide union jobs. The candidates would also face pressure to offer specifics on their position on the Green New Deal, the ambitious progressive climate resolution that Republicans have sought to tar as an expensive socialist boondoggle.
Presidential candidates like Beto O'Rourke have released ambitious climate change plans on the heels of pressure campaigns from progressive activists, while others, like former Vice President Joe Biden, face big questions about how ambitious an agenda they will lay out while balancing the needs of organized labor. Democrats also have a far from unified position on questions such as whether natural gas and nuclear power should have any role in combating climate change, in a sign of how far leftward the discussion has shifted since Barack Obama left the White House.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
Destroying the capitalist system that they all benefit from is gonna be a tough sell.
Isn’t it now 11.589 years?
...and themselves.
If the Sun doesn't start making Sunspots by then
We in a realm of cold hurt.
Solar cells iced over in the snow
Windmills frozen
And frozen corpses of global warming aficionados hanging from unlit lampposts
My hope is that the POTUS will mention that we’re down to 11 years when he delivers the next SOTU address.
97% of the CO2 produced each year comes from natural sources.
Completely eliminate man’s contribution and it’s not even a blip, especially considering natural CO2 production fluctuates considerably more than 3% from year to year.
Idiots.
We just hope voters are smarter and won’t fall for all the lies and propaganda.
...others, like former Vice President Joe Biden, face big questions about how ambitious an agenda they will lay out while balancing the needs of organized labor.
“...that the Republicans have sought to tar... “
Another unbiased article.
Smh
“Why would these hoax deniers waste time on this”?
It’s simple: They rely on the ignorance of so many Americans who have no ability to discern or think critically. They are like sheep and are treated as such.
The main factor that the left always leaves out of their “climate change” discussion is that CO2 is literally the molecule of life. Eliminate CO2 from the atmosphere, eliminate life.
So many of these useful idiots have swallowed the anti-CO2 propaganda that they will cheer if technology is used to remove CO2, even as the act drives the world to a mass extinction event. And there are many schemes to artificially remove CO2 from the air.
I can hardly wait for 11 years and 7 months from now, when it will finally be too late to do anything about Climate Change, and we can just sit back and enjoy our slow slide to extinction.
> want their party to dedicate one of its presidential primary debates to climate change <
Ha, ha, ha! That’s funny right there. A true debate on climate change would include folks with very different viewpoints.
But the only disagreement among the Democrats is when the world will be destroyed. Will it be 10, 15, or 20 years from now? And should we fine the deniers, or should we imprison them?
First you pounce
Then you seize
Then you tar
U.N. predicts disaster if global warming not checked - June 29 1989, Peter Spielman
https://www.apnews.com/bd45c372caf118ec99964ea547880cd0
UNITED NATIONS (AP) _ A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.
Or use lead.
I want these academics and anyone who has taken money in the name of the hoax to go before Congress and explain their findings under oath.
That will be the end of it, once and for all.
The population bomb said we would all be dead by 1980 from over population.
This scam is quite old.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
