[nathanbedford]

I've seen you post this admonition several times and, frankly, I simply do not understand it.

Am I correct that you object to funneling traffic to the poster's website when he could simply post the whole message conveniently here?

Do we not have many, indeed virtually all our posts of articles directed to a website? How was he different? Is Nextrush different in substance from an aggregator like Drudge? Did not the author contribute a lot of effort to creating the content? Is not the worker worthy of his hire?

If there were no incentive to do the collecting, or the aggregating, distillation, whatever we call it, can we expect him, Drudge or anyone to do it for nothing?

I find the resume informative and not otherwise objectionable.

So I ask, without hidden agenda, the objection?

[humblegunner]

How was he different?

He wants to be paid for writing essentially a vanity thread.

Is Nextrush different in substance from an aggregator like Drudge?

Drudge provides links, Nextrash provides stolen headlines.

Is not the worker worthy of his hire?

Nobody hired this clown.