Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marc Thiessen: Don't dismiss Trump's Greenland proposal. It's far from ridiculous
Fox News ^ | August 23, 2019 | Marc Thiessen, The Washington Post

Posted on 08/24/2019 3:49:15 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

President Trump is upset that Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen called his interest in purchasing Greenland "absurd." Her dismissive response should have come as no surprise. In 1946, when President Harry Truman tried to purchase Greenland, Secretary of State James Byrnes wrote that the proposal "seemed to come as a shock" and an insult to Danish officials, who turned it down.

That was a big mistake. As part of his deal, Truman had offered to trade parts of the Point Barrow district of Alaska, including the rights to any oil discovered there, to Denmark, in exchange for parts of Greenland. The Danes dismissed the idea just as they did Trump's proposal. In 1967, the richest oil strike in U.S. history was made in the Point Barrow area. Bad move, Denmark! Sad!

With that blunder in their rearview mirror, you would think that Danish leaders would at least hear Trump out. The president's idea of buying Greenland is far from absurd. Today we have a military base in Greenland, so there is no need to buy it for that purpose. But Greenland has enormous unexplored stores of natural resources, including zinc, lead, gold, iron ore, diamonds, copper and uranium, that Denmark has been unable or unwilling to exploit.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: alaska; denmark; europeanunion; greenland; marcthiessen; nato; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 08/24/2019 3:49:16 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I always have problems with blaming people for not having psychic abilities. OK, the Danes didn’t go for Point Barrow. So they subsequently found oil. Hindsight is 20/20. You have to make decisions based on what you know, not what may be known from now till the end of time. Washington Post. ‘nuff said.


2 posted on 08/24/2019 3:53:51 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fhayek

I think you misread it.

The article said the Danes passed and after they passed on the purchase/trade, oil was discovered in the district that was offered up for trade.


3 posted on 08/24/2019 3:58:47 PM PDT by sauropod (I am His and He is Mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Sarah Palin: Trump Can See Greenland from His House

"Now let’s go back to the place Seward eyed first. Greenland is economically valuable because of its immense natural resources. Aside from yuge oil and gas development possibilities and enormously rich fisheries, Greenland has iron ore, lead, zinc, gold, and uranium. But perhaps most importantly, the arctic region, and Greenland in particular, is full of rare earth elements, a crucial material necessary for manufacturing just about everything from computer chips to fiber optics to missiles to tanks and you name it. We need rare earth elements to sustain our manufacturing sector and equip our military. And, as shocking as it is to say this, our country is currently dangerously dependent on China to supply our rare earth metals. Since when is it a good idea to be totally dependent on your strategic enemy for an essential resource? China knows they have us over a barrel on this. In fact, as Breitbart’s John Carney reported last May, Beijing has threatened to “weaponize” our dependence on their rare earths as leverage against us in their trade fight."

4 posted on 08/24/2019 4:04:00 PM PDT by KC_Lion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Since when is it a good idea to be totally dependent on your strategic enemy for an essential resource


Since Bill Clinton shut US rare earth mines ...


5 posted on 08/24/2019 4:10:32 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Yeah he’s the gift that keeps on giving.

Like a VD.


6 posted on 08/24/2019 4:20:09 PM PDT by dp0622 (Bad, bad company Till the day I die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

China will buy Greenland slowly. They already offered to buy the closed USAF Sondrestram Airbase, but Denmark refused. China will eventually get a port for “research”, even if they have to build it. China recently offered to build three airports in Greenland.


7 posted on 08/24/2019 4:35:35 PM PDT by Stevenfo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

just think of all the farmland in Greenland when Gorebull Warming really kicks in,


8 posted on 08/24/2019 4:39:40 PM PDT by morphing libertarian ( Use Comey's Report, Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They have diamonds? The diamond companies and barons won’t like that. Then they can’t artificially limit the supply.


9 posted on 08/24/2019 4:40:57 PM PDT by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stevenfo

What I would like to know is what the residents of Greenland want? Do they want to be Chinese citizens or American? There is an island on the other side of the world where the people desperately wish to be American and not Chinese!


10 posted on 08/24/2019 4:42:32 PM PDT by erkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

10 Harrow House.


11 posted on 08/24/2019 4:45:53 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: erkelly

If Greenland is not sold to the US it will be in the hands of the Eurasia Muslim Caliphate in 20 years.


12 posted on 08/24/2019 4:56:51 PM PDT by Torahman (Remember the Maccabees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The FreeStateProject people should ditch New Hampshire, move to Greenland, get a majority there, and then push Denmark for the sale, or barring that have the U.S. on a 99 year lease like the UK had with Hong Kong.


13 posted on 08/24/2019 5:01:26 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("...a choice between Woke-fevered Democrats and Koch-funded Republicans is insufficient."-Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
It may,or may not,be a good idea but if Denmark doesn't want to sell then the matter's closed.
14 posted on 08/24/2019 5:09:42 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (A joke: Brennan,Comey and Lynch walk into a Barr...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erkelly

I suspect support is higher than is currently implied by the lamestream media coverage.


15 posted on 08/24/2019 5:26:22 PM PDT by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (Go Egypt on 0bama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Invade!


16 posted on 08/24/2019 5:41:54 PM PDT by Behind the Blue Wall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Right, if Denmark doesn't want to sell it, there isn't anything we can do to force them to change their minds.

Polk tried to buy California from Mexico before the Mexican War. After they were defeated they agreed to sell it as part of the peace treaty. But without the Mexican War the first line of the Marine Corps Hymn wouldn't make much sense.

17 posted on 08/24/2019 5:53:35 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Just flying over Greenland gave me the shudders. Nothing but frozen ice and rock. 836,000 square miles that’s uninhabitable by man or beast.

There’s a reason the population is only 56K people. Nobody in their right mind would want to live there.


18 posted on 08/24/2019 6:03:35 PM PDT by 2111USMC (Aim Small Miss Small)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I think Trump is right on China, and may be right on Greenland.


19 posted on 08/24/2019 6:05:56 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2111USMC

America is slowly being boxed in the the Chicoms.


20 posted on 08/24/2019 6:10:01 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson