Posted on 09/12/2019 3:51:04 PM PDT by RArtfulogerDodger
...NOTE from beneath Area 52: 9/8/2019
This piece of satire really struck a nerve or a thong or jockstrap or tooth or something. Because it’s still getting Visits, and heated “Comments,” even though it was originally posted, 7/8/2019, which a relatively long time ago, in Internet days.
9/12/2019: ACTUALLY, it even seems to me to be under some sort of attack...
If you hate the article so much, why don’t you just scrub the article from your site(s)?
Why Not?
I GUESS, MAYBE, BECAUSE IT GETS YOU CLICKS ?? 🙂
This article is getting so many clicks, maybe I should put some ads on my site, write more articles like this one.....
(THIS article was published previously on my site, but has been updated several times, since. ALSO: There are too many photos and Effects for Me to try and publish the whole thing here. OH: I receive ZERO payment for clicks or clickthroughs.)
(Excerpt) Read more at conservativerightwingnews.com ...
You don’t know what could be found in the “penumbras” of the Constitution.
I identify as a lesbian trapped in a man’s body, so it’s OK.
Sure I do: ANYthing Democrats want.
I’m sort of a boob-loving lesbian myself.
Cue techno-trance music and multi-colored drinks with umbrellas in them.
Someone once remarked that gay sex will eventually morph from lawful to mandatory. What was once a one-liner may evolve into reality.
LITTLE umbrellas. With no pointy thingies on them.
I KNEW i saw that somewheres....
Sorry, I already gave at the IRS.
remember that gay sex was (mostly) mandatory in Sodom
Oh, snap! Missed out on that!
Will muzzies get a goat pass instead?
For the Left, there are only 2 options: You’re banned from it, or you’re forced to do it.
Hahaha, that funneh!
“Goat directly to jail.”
Hahaha! (I slay me.)
Good one.
It’s possible. The “T’s” believe that it’s transphobic for straight guys to discriminate in their dating preferences against “transwomen” (biological males who identify as women). Putting aside whether it’s even possible for a man to become a woman via surgery and hormone treatment, to qualify as a transwoman requires nothing more than to “identify” as a woman; there is no requirement there be any physiological basis to that claim.
Following that to its logical conclusion, in order for a straight guy to “prove” that he’s not “transphobic”, he would need to have sex with a transwomen at least once. And if there’s evidence that he’s otherwise willing to have sex with women generally whenever the opportunity presents itself, then he may have to have sex with transwomen repeatedly in order to establish his nondiscriminatory bonafides.
To put it another way, in the future, any man who refuses the sexual advances of a transwoman will be considered transphobic, a form of bigotry akin to racism, which is against the law in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Needless to say, in my book, regardless of the “plumbing”, a man cannot have anything other than gay sex with a transwoman. Thus in the future, gay sex will be required.
Only applies to those who are too much of a pussy to fight back, IMO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.