Posted on 11/18/2019 12:35:12 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I’m wonder how many of those included are adult prostitutes. The wording here is suspicious.
ROTFLMAO! You don’t make me laugh often, but that’s funny right there...I don’t care who you are.
“Whether it is frazzledrip...”
A fake video. Where are the emails you mentioned?
“Podesta scalding a young child in a hot shower...”
Another fake video. Where are the emails you mentioned?
“Or the assassination of Podesta’s illegitimate son, Chester Bennington...”
Total batsh*t bonkers crazytown stuff. Where are the emails you mentioned?
“Cathy O’Brien...”
Is a lunatic. Where are the emails you mentioned?
“Bill Clinton himself admitted to our government’s role in MK Ultra”
Everyone knows about MK Ultra, the files were declassified decades ago. Where are the emails you mentioned?
Don’t send me another word salad post showing how kooky you are. You either have actual emails with evidence that doesn’t require a secret decoder ring provided only by an anonymous 4chan poster or you don’t have them. Which is it?
“Are the Clintons/operatives involved? Show me, don’t tell me.”
Well, they can’t show you. It was a looney tunes theory with no real evidence right from the start, and it hasn’t gotten any better with time. But some people really want it to be true I guess.
Your reply is text book on how to deal with a lunatic. Well done.
IBTZ
OR maybe the Bushes (or more likely the Clintons) are behind the ...
Yeah, them Bushes are all pedophile global kid killers.
That's why the media loved them so much.
Yep.
Slavery is a profession, it’s just that it doesn’t usually pay very well...
“A fake video.”
You are a Podesta-Clinton apologist. Nothing you say is trustworthy. You should go work for Adam Schiff. He’s more your speed.
“Where are the emails you mentioned?”
Maybe you’ve heard of Wikileaks. All of the emails are indexed and searchable. And I gave you a list of dozens of instances supporting exactly what the Clintons are. And you fixate on the tiniest part of the mountain of evidence. And of course when I gave you one good example: ‘What’s your explanation for Tamera Luzzatto’s ‘Thelema favor’,’ you gloss over it and repeat your ridiculous demands.
Here. I’ll do your legwork for you, but don’t ask again. You’re a big boy. Time to put on your big boy panties and do your own homework:
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/39459
“Another fake video.”
Podesta, is that you?
There is a voice analysis in which literally anyone can tell the voice screaming at the kid is John Podesta.
“Cathy O’Brien, is a lunatic.”
Dear Lord, please observe the one who is making wicked and malicious attacks and dispense upon him the fair and righteous judgment he deserves. Let his curses fall on his head. Let his mockery of the innocent and suffering be brought before the presence of Your throne and plague his life in a manner of which he is worthy. Let his name become a byword and his life an object lesson of the consequences of being a scorner. Let him learn the fear of the Lord which is beginning of wisdom by giving him exactly what he deserves. Amen.
Podesta and Clinton lover much?
“Your reply is text book on how to deal with a lunatic.”
Everyone has heard of projection.
Did the questions about being a patron of prostitutes bother you?
It is very odd when a person feels COMPELLED to chime in and defend how prostitution is a harmless job, particularly when discussing kidnapping and trafficking in human beings. And then this person responds to questions by labeling the person who asks as a “lunatic”.
Maybe you could tell the forum why you felt compelled to describe prostitution and sex trafficking as if it was just normal, everyday business.
While you are at it, you can explain your agreement with a person defending the Clintons and Podestas from credible accusations of child trafficking and abuse.
Most people on this forum are aware that the moral depravity that allows people like this to defend killing babies and selling their body parts makes them very suspect when it comes to their moral trustworthiness in other areas of things done in secret.
Those who sympathize with them also have things to hide. You and he think you can hide who you are and what you do behind the masks of screen names, but God knows. And quite frankly you’re not fooling the majority of folks here, even if they choose to ignore your self-incriminating posts.
“Maybe you’ve heard of Wikileaks. All of the emails are indexed and searchable.”
Of course, I know all about it. It shouldn’t be that hard to produce the emails you made claims about since they’re all online and easily linked to. Unless you can’t produce them, or they don’t actually contain what you claim.
“Here. I’ll do your legwork for you...
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/39459";
Ok, so you produce an email about a 95 year old grandma that asked someone who is friends with Podesta if he can set up a meeting with Obama? That is your proof of some child sex trafficking conspiracy?
“but don’t ask again”
I’ll keep asking unless you actually produce something, or admit that you can’t produce it. Or you can give up and just stop replying to me.
“There is a voice analysis...”
Hahaha. Ok, sure, I’ll bite. Where is this “voice analysis”. It’s from some actual credentialed professional and not just a random kook on the internet, I’m sure.
But back to the actual point, where are these emails that say what you claimed they say?
“credible accusations of child trafficking and abuse”
If they’re credible, that means you have actual evidence, right.
Have you taken this evidence to the police?
If you get any closer you will contract rabies. You can almost see him frothing at the mouth.
“Have you taken this evidence to the police?”
Have you submitted yourself to a psychiatric evaluation?
We have open crimes being committed nonstop by Obama, Hillary, et al. Clintons flying to Epstein’s private island. Benghazi. Weaponizing IRS against conservatives. Fast and Furious. Circumvention of immigration law. Voter fraud. Hillary’s using a personal email server for what she knew was classified intelligence and she knew was a serious crime. Do you think that evidence did not exist? Do you think my limited access to it means it did not exist? Do you think it was somehow my job to take it to the police or therefore I am not allowed to point the finger at them for their crimes?
That is one of the nuttiest arguments I’ve ever heard on this forum, and I’ve heard a lot.
Sound like someone who needs to take his meds.
Maybe the Center for Medical Progress should just take their evidence to the police for Planned Parenthood killing live babies after they are born by harvesting their organs to sell? Maybe you think those are fake videos too?
Maybe the police will just drive over to PP and round up the criminals on those videos and take them straight to jail, and then they can swing by and pick up the Clintons, after showing the Secret Service the videos that expose them, right? And then they’ll go to jail, and we will all live happily ever after? I can see it right now. You should sell your story idea to Disney.
I see you continue to ignore mountains of evidence to further your agenda which includes the defense of the Clintons and Podestas.
The only credibility question here is why anyone on this forum should consider you credible. No one on this forum agrees with you accept that prostitution defender who you seem to get along with so well.
“I’ll keep asking unless you...”
How about you start by examining the ONE email, instead of demanding I do your homework for you?
“Ok, so you produce an email about a 95 year old grandma that asked someone who is friends with Podesta...”
Pull your pants up and stop exposing your ignorance in public. It’s disgraceful. Frankly, I would have trouble looking in the mirror if I displayed such a ridiculous combination of arrogance and ignorance. Get help!
Tamera Luzzatto wrote that email. She isn’t 95. She’s 62. And she was Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff from 2001 to 2009 (otherwise known as the Benghazi years, or the wiped server years, if you prefer).
I’ll make this very simple so that even a simpleton can follow:
What is Thelema?
If you can’t take the time to examine a single email objectively, then you are less than a waste of time. I’ve been nice up to this point.
“How about you start by examining the ONE email...”
I did. It’s just not very compelling.
“Tamera Luzzatto wrote that email.”
No, John Demos wrote the email:
From: john demos [mailto:jgedemos2@aol.com]
“She isn’t 95. She’s 62.”
I didn’t actually say a 95 year old wrote the email, I said it was ABOUT a 95 year old, which it is:
“her 95 year old mother would even make the extra effort to come to D.C. to meet with the president”
Maybe you need to go back and spend more time “examining” this email yourself.
“What is Thelema?”
An occult religion created by Aleister Crowley. It’s also a Greek word that means “will”. It even appears in the New Testament many times. None of that really supports what you claimed was in the emails.
So, where are the emails that say what you claimed they said?
“Do you think that evidence did not exist?”
The evidence that you referred to about emails from wikileaks showing some sex trafficking conspiracy? Well, since you continue deflecting instead of just producing them, yeah, I’m pretty sure they don’t exist. Otherwise you could just produce them and drop all the melodrama.
“Do you think it was somehow my job to take it to the police”
Yes, actually, I do. You see, you claim to have knowledge of serious crimes that have been committed. If that is true, it is your duty, both morally and legally, to bring any evidence you have to the police.
Now, since apparently you have not done that, it leaves only two possibilities:
1. You don’t actually have any evidence to back up your claims.
2. You are withholding evidence of a crime from the authorities, which makes you an accessory after the fact to these crimes and just as guilty as those who perpetrated them, in the eyes of the law.
There aren’t really any other possibilities, so which one is it?
“I see you continue to ignore mountains of evidence...”
You can’t deliver on the first piece of evidence I asked about, so why bother asking about any others? Copy/pasting a link to the emails that actually say what you claimed they say is about the easiest thing you can do, so if you can’t accomplish that much, then I’m not bothering to worry about any of the other “evidence” you want to ramble on about.
Insane in the brain. Only a complete fruit loop or fraud would assert that the MILLIONS of people—who KNOW that the Clintons, Obamas, Podestas, et al. are part of the corrupt child killing cabal—must all run straight to their local police department with evidence or they are guilty of a crime.
Such people fit right in with the Democrat hoaxers. They need straight jackets and padded rooms.
People who pose as conservative in the political circles and on conservative sites like FR in order to spread disinformation and promote their filthy agenda need to be made an example of FIRST. So, THANK YOU for reminding me that imprecatory prayers have been lacking.
There is endless evidence out in the open of crimes against humanity by the people YOU defend on a conservative forum. Your feigned ignorance is not gonna cut it. The mountains of evidence Hillary tried to delete from her servers apparently is not crime to you. The fact that some of those emails survived anyway due to Wikileaks, which you would like to convince others to be fake, seems to trouble you for some reason.
By the way, thelema is a Greek word, as you mention, used in the Bible. But it is Koine Greek, not modern Greek. They weren’t talking about getting together for a Bible study to explore the original language of the New Testament. The capitalization also indicates something else. Nice try though.
This isn’t going to go away for your pedophile friends. And their lackey’s are just helping to insure that their crimes are not forgotten.
What are you going to defend next? Planned Parenthood didn’t really dismember live babies and sell their body parts? The videos that suggest otherwise were highly-edited and fake, right? Going to defend transgender pedophiles telling stories to little kids at public libraries next? Christian adoption agencies are being run off to give orphaned kids to homosexuals—must either be fake or pointing it out is evidence of bigotry? Right? Or is not running to the local police department to tell them also a crime in your mind? Do tell.
Dear Lord, please observe those who are making wicked and malicious attacks and dispense upon them the fair and righteous judgment they deserve. Defend me against wicked people, Lord. Let their curses fall on their own heads. Let their mockery of the innocent and suffering be brought before the presence of Your throne and plague their lives in a manner of which they are worthy. Let their names become bywords and their lives object lessons of the consequences of their mockery. Let people gain the fear of the Lord, which is beginning of wisdom, when they observe the destruction of the wicked, receiving exactly what they deserve. Let all of the wicked deeds of the wicked be found out and justice be rendered. Let them be divided against each other. Give them over to confusion and madness. Blind them so that they do not find their evil path. Let them fall into their own traps. You have said that You hate the hands that shed innocent blood, therefore cut them off Lord in the severity of your judgment. As you said the offenses against children would come to pass in the last days, so let the woes you pronounced upon their offenders come to pass. Amen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.