"We don't know if it was specifically Dominion traffic"
I.e., there is no evidence of anything here.
“You can summarize the BS blog spam post with one quotation from the video:
“We don’t know if it was specifically Dominion traffic”
I.e., there is no evidence of anything here.”
EXACTLY. The whole blog post is nothing more than hopium.
“You can summarize the BS blog spam post with one quotation from the video:
“We don’t know if it was specifically Dominion traffic”
I.e., there is no evidence of anything here.”
Assuming the White Hat recorded the traffic, this would be evidence:
The IP and MAC address is not encrypted only the data is encrypted if they use a secure connection.
They can look at the IP address in the packet to see if it belongs to a known Dominion client or Server machine.
If not the IP address they can look for a MAC address in the frame. Each network card contains a unique MAC address.
"We don't know if it was specifically Dominion traffic"
Not to mention the fact that he was monitoring dominionvoting.com which is the software company's corporate network so the traffic could have been email, accounting spreadsheets, marketing materials or investor relations stuff.
What we do know is it almost certainly wasn't data to or from the voting machines because they aren't connected.