Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

M22 Locust: America’s Forgotten World War II Flying Tank
19FortyFive ^ | 2/12/2021 | Caleb Larson

Posted on 02/12/2021 12:58:42 PM PST by Onthebrink

One of the lesser-known tanks of the Second World War is the M22 Locust, a small, three-man tank that was intended to fly with airborne troops and augment their firepower on the ground.

M22 Locust: A History

In order to keep up with troops in the air, it was assumed that a small tank should be towed behind an airplane inside a glider. And while technically feasible, it required an especially small tank to be designed that would have both light armor and a decidedly light main gun.

(Excerpt) Read more at 19fortyfive.com ...


TOPICS: Government; History; Military/Veterans; Politics
KEYWORDS: blogcrap; blogpimp; crapblog; history; military; militaryhistory; worldwarii; ww2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 02/12/2021 12:58:42 PM PST by Onthebrink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Onthebrink

Sure be nice if you just posted the article here instead of trolling for hits. I’d probably find a lot of your articles interesting, but out of principle I won’t go to your site, you post often and try to garner hits shamelessly.


2 posted on 02/12/2021 1:02:39 PM PST by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulwyf

.


3 posted on 02/12/2021 1:05:23 PM PST by Grampa Dave (Law & order took the last train out of DC & America on election/coup/night, Tuesday, Nov. 03, 2020!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Onthebrink

It wasn’t a ‘flying tank.’ The Soviets actually built one of those.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonov_A-40

It was designed to fit in a glider. It failed because it wasn’t a particularly useful tank - light armor, puny gun, etc.


4 posted on 02/12/2021 1:16:14 PM PST by Little Ray (The Government is always its own largest and most important Special Interest. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Onthebrink

5 posted on 02/12/2021 1:22:54 PM PST by Yo-Yo (is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Onthebrink

Interesting story!!

Thanks for posting!!


6 posted on 02/12/2021 1:25:07 PM PST by Bartholomew Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bulwyf

I clicked it for you. You’re welcome.


7 posted on 02/12/2021 1:28:22 PM PST by ExGeeEye (For dark is the suede that mows like a harvest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

And they built the flying equivalent of a tank in the IL-2, as well.


8 posted on 02/12/2021 1:39:47 PM PST by Little Pig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
Looks and sounds like an early version/concept of the M2/M3 Bradley Fighting Vehicle, not an actual tank.
9 posted on 02/12/2021 1:58:43 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

Or the Sheridan.


10 posted on 02/12/2021 1:59:51 PM PST by Trailerpark Badass (“There should be a whole lot more going on than throwing bleach,” said one woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Trailerpark Badass
Too big of a gun on it (152mm main gun), IMO, for an infantry support vehicle. That moves it into proper tank territory as the main gun (pretty much) was the demarcation point of tank vs support vehicles.

JMO, YMMV

11 posted on 02/12/2021 2:05:44 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Onthebrink


12 posted on 02/12/2021 2:06:14 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Imagine the tank crew - you are in a small, lightly armored tank that is delivered to the battlefield by a glider. Just imagining being in a situation like that should make one gasp.


13 posted on 02/12/2021 2:12:30 PM PST by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Onthebrink

The US finally DID build a “flying tank”, the A-10 Thunderbolt II or as it was more popularly known, the Warthog.

https://www.military.com/equipment/a-10-thunderbolt-ii

One of the best close-air-support airplanes ever built.

A fearsome sight for any enemy foot soldier as it comes in about fifty feet off the deck at 350 knots. And knocks out a tank that is six miles away over the horizon.


14 posted on 02/12/2021 2:16:45 PM PST by alloysteel (Praise the Lord, and pass the ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

as did the Krauts with the Hs-129


15 posted on 02/12/2021 2:24:40 PM PST by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I want one.


16 posted on 02/12/2021 2:25:29 PM PST by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism:http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

I like those symmetric stress risers in the fuselage skin between each frame as the whole glider is distorted as the tank rolls out.


17 posted on 02/12/2021 2:26:10 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (Method, motive, and opportunity: No morals, shear madness and hatred by those who cheat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam

The machine in the second picture is a British Tetrarch, which the Locust was supposed to replace.


18 posted on 02/12/2021 2:32:37 PM PST by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wilhelm Tell
Imagine the tank crew - you are in a small, lightly armored tank that is delivered to the battlefield by a glider.

The Russians had a different idea. Why waste the materials on a fuselage? Just put the wings and tail on the tank istelf.

It only flew once...


19 posted on 02/12/2021 2:41:07 PM PST by Yo-Yo (is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Onthebrink

It’s a baby tank!

Interesting to read of some of the experiments that are tried with war machines. Randomly stumbled into a YouTube video the other day that talked about a 1960’s era design for a flying nuclear powered aircraft carrier called the CL-1201!

This behemoth was to have been designed to carry some 20 aircraft, nuclear missiles, and was supposed to have a laser to shoot down incoming missiles.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7KgjObskvM


20 posted on 02/12/2021 2:56:03 PM PST by Flick Lives (“Today we celebrate the first glorious anniversary of the Information Purification Directives.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson