Wisconsin's Voting Machines Were Connected To The Internet During The 2020 Election

Dominion and ES&S were online and a Democrat operative ran Green Bay's election from his Hyatt Regency hotel room..

Last August, Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos authorized the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), headed by retired state Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, to investigate concerns about the 2020 election. Gableman delivered an interim report to the state assembly on November 10, 2021.

Last Tuesday, Gableman delivered a second interim report to the Wisconsin Assembly’s elections committee. Mr. Gableman wrote, “Ultimately, WEC’s directives mandated that widespread “election fraud” be undertaken in relation to the November 2020 election.”

Mr. Gableman vetted more than 90 nursing homes in five different counties before concluding there was “widespread election fraud at Wisconsin nursing homes in November of 2020.”

Mr. Gableman also found that $8.8 million in Zuckerberg grant funds directed solely to five Democratic strongholds in Wisconsin violated the state’s election code’s prohibition on bribery. He wrote, “The record created by public document requests shows that CTCL, a private company headquartered in Chicago, engaged in an election bribery scheme.”

Zuckerberg’s CTCL grant money came with strings attached that created a two-tiered election system that treated voters differently depending on whether they lived in Democrat or Republican areas. Wisconsin’s five largest cities—Milwaukee, Madison, Racine, Kenosha, and Green Bay—were invited to take CTCL’s private money on the condition that they “increased in-person voting and absentee voting for targeted areas and groups”.

These groups met particular demographic criteria which, Gableman wrote, “matched that of the Biden-voter profile”.

Zuckerberg’s grant money also hired “CTCL’s partners for election administration”. A New York lawyer and Democrat political operative, Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein was listed as a “CTCL grant mentor” who directed election administration in Green Bay.

Mr. Rubenstein provided instructions to Central Count workers, developed absentee voting protocols, and set up a wireless network for Election Day operations in his Hyatt Regency hotel room.

The Special Counsel wrote, “At Mr. Spitzer Rubenstein’s instruction, there were three WiFi networks available. One was the general conference facility public network that would be available to members of the press and others. That network was password-protected, but the password was widely available. A second password-protected WiFi network was created for Central Count staff. Mr. Spitzer Rubenstein also directed that a third WiFi network be established, but that network was to be hidden and it was not to be password-protected. Spitzer Rubenstein also ensured that both networks reached his hotel room on the 8th floor.”

Two major machine manufacturers were identified in Wisconsin, Dominion Voting and ES&S. In regards to Dominion, Mr. Gableman wrote, “These specific machines can be manipulated to alter actual votes cast— either surreptitiously or by the machine technicians.” He continued:

“The OSC was able to identify, through the reports of experts, that the failed machine recorded two anonymous and unauthorized access events from its VPN. This means, contrary to what Dominion has publicly stated, that at least some machines had access to the internet on election night. Shortly after the unauthorized access was recorded, the machine failed and was reset, wiping all voting history and forcing that election administrator to rely on unverifiable paper printouts from the failed machine.”

In regards to ES&S, Gableman stated that the central problem was that “several of the machines are made with a 4G wireless modem installed, enabling them to connect to the internet through a Wi-Fi hotspot.”

One municipality under investigation in Wisconsin by the OSC admitted that these machines had these modems and were connected to the internet on election night. The reason given was to “transmit data” about votes to the county clerks.

This comes as no surprise as NBC News reported on January 10, 2020, that ES&S had 14,000 modems in use to connect tabulators to the internet.

The OSC learned that all machines in Green Bay were ES&S machines and were connected to a secret, hidden Wi-Fi access point at the Grand Hyatt hotel, which was the location used by the City of Green Bay on the day of the 2020 Presidential election.

The OSC discovered the Wi-Fi, machines, and ballots were controlled by, Michael Spitzer-Rubenstein, a single individual, who was not a government employee but an agent of a special interest group operating in Wisconsin.

The OSC spent a great deal of time looking into the use of a “ ballot tracking and harvesting application” that was used in Wisconsin, Georgia, and Pennsylvania. The OSC discovered the application when “reviewing email exchanges between the Zuckerberg 5 and third parties”.

The OSC identified the developers and obtained the source code for the application. These cell phone apps were part of the Zuckerberg funded operation and they allowed the user access to the voter rolls and live updates on ballots received by a county.

The OSC also learned that cities had access to statewide WisVote and BadgerBooks data through an Application Programming Interface (API), which provided real time, free information to special interest groups who used that information for selective, racially-targeted get-out-the-vote purposes under the contracts.

Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman will continue his investigation, but he has already confirmed that the voting machines were connected to the internet on election night, private money dictated policies that undermined state laws, and there was widespread fraud in Wisconsin’s 2020 presidential election which was decided by 20,682 votes.

This claim was about Brown County. As I pointed out, Trump GAINED votes in Brown County.

Those uncomfortable facts are facts that you don’t want to deal with.

I actually went through the county vote totals in Wisconsin after all the Grifter Pundit lies about “DA MAZHINZ STIL DA ELCNIN.”

What I found was quite different than the social media/grifter pundit narrative.

Contrary to what you have been told, it isn’t some big secret as to what kind of machines were used in each County.

In fact, Wisconsin breaks this down by precinct.

https://elections.wi.gov/elections-voting/voting-equipment/voting-equipment-use

The prevailing Grifter Pundit narrative as been “DA DOMINNZ MACHINS STOL DA VOTE IN WISCONSIN.”

This simply can’t be correct. Why? Trump increased his vote share and raw vote as compared to 2016 when we count up all the votes in the counties that used Dominion machines.

In all but 3 counties, Trump did better in 2020 than in 2016. If DA DOMINONZ was rigging the vote in Wisconsin, it failed miserably, as it netted Trump more votes.

Crawford County
2020
53.1% 4,620
45.5% 3,953
1.4% 122
2016
49.6% 3,836
44.2% 3,419
6.1% 473

Door County
2020
48.5% 9,752
49.9% 10,044
1.6% 321
2016
48.8% 8,580
45.6% 8,014
5.7% 998

Fond_du_Lac_County
2020
62.4% 35,754
36.0% 20,588
1.6% 909
2016
59.9% 31,022
33.6% 17,387
6.5% 3,387

Grant County
2020
55.2% 14,142
43.0% 10,998
1.8% 468
2016
50.7% 12,350
41.3% 10,051
8.1% 1,967

Green County
2020
47.5% 10,169
50.7% 10,851
1.8% 386
2016
45.8% 8,693
48.1% 9,122
6.2% 1,170

Juneau County (Minority of precincts)
2020
63.8% 8,749
34.6% 4,746
1.6% 214
2016
60.8% 7,130
34.7% 4,073
4.5% 532

OCONTO COUNTY
2020
69.9% 16,226
28.9% 6,715
1.2% 274
2016
66.0% 13,345
29.4% 5,940
4.6% 921

ONEIDA COUNTY (1 precinct)
2020
56.6% 13,671
41.8% 10,105
1.6% 383
2016
56.4% 12,132
37.7% 8,109
6.0% 1,290

OZAUKEE COUNTY
2020
55.2% 33,912
43.1% 26,517
1.7% 1,057
2016
55.8% 30,464
37.0% 20,170
7.2% 3,926

PRICE COUNTY
2020
63.1% 5,394
35.5% 3,032
1.4% 120
2016
60.2% 4,559
35.2% 2,667
4.5% 342

RACINE COUNTY
2020
51.2% 54,479
47.1% 50,159
1.7% 1,813
2016
49.5% 46,681
45.2% 42,641
5.3% 4,980

RUSK COUNTY (1 precinct)
2020
66.7% 5,257
31.9% 2,517
1.4% 112
2016
64.4% 4,564
30.6% 2,171
5.0% 353

SAWYER COUNTY – (2 precincts)
2020
56.2% 5,909
42.8% 4,498
1.0% 103
2016
56.8% 5,185
38.3% 3,503
4.9% 449

TREMPEALEAU COUNTY (1 precinct)
2020
57.4% 8,833
40.9% 6,285
1.7% 262
2016
53.8% 7,366
41.2% 5,636
5.0% 685

VILAS COUNTY
2020
60.3% 9,261
38.4% 5,903
1.3% 205
2016
60.0% 8,166
35.1% 4,770
5.0% 675

WALWORTH COUNTY
2020
58.8% 33,851
39.6% 22,789
1.7% 960
2016
56.2% 28,863
36.4% 18,710
7.4% 3,818

WASHINGTON COUNTY
2020
68.4% 60,237
30.3% 26,650
1.3% 1,183
2016
67.4% 51,740
27.2% 20,852
5.4% 4,165

WAUPACA COUNTY (minority of precincts)
2020
65.1% 18,952
33.3% 9,703
1.6% 475
2016
62.1% 16,209
32.4% 8,451
5.5% 1,435

WINNEBAGO COUNTY –
2020
50.8% 47,796
46.9% 44,060
2.3% 2,176
2016
49.9% 43,445
42.5% 37,047
7.6% 6,643

There were really only two counties that had significant Democrat overperformances as compared to 2016. Dane and Milwaukee.

Neither of them use Dominion Machines. Moreover, it wasn’t the machines at all where Democrats ran up vote totals anywhere.

It was with the MAIL-IN BALLOTS.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.