“On the one hand, I did not vote for Trump. I voted for Libertarian Gary Johnson in 2016, and Libertarian Jo Jorgensen in 2020. So I’m not a Trump fan.”
Idiocy.
Do you realize how ridiculous it is that they never show this?
Yes. Bingo.
I have not seen the movie yet, but I think “Dan from Squirrel Hill” misses a huge part of the premise.
There is cell phone tracking data that pinpoints the same perps at lots of dropboxes with great precision and reliability. There is not video surviellance for all of them, because that particular type of evidence is not available. I beleive the videomakers spent $ millions for cell phone data because that is where the data is.
There was not a video crew following perps in the act. All the evidence had to be gathered months after the crime.
The cell phone tracking data is the same type of data used by the FBI to catch people who attended the J6 political rally.
“My biggest criticism of the movie is that despite its repeated claims that these 2,000 “ballot traffickers” each put mail-in ballots into many different dropboxes, the movie never actually shows video footage of even one of these people depositing ballots into more than one dropbox.”
Most of the drop boxes had no survaliance cameras, others had cameras but they were pointed away from the boxes. Some states such as Wisconsin had ZERO cameras. Most of the evidence is based on the geotracking of cell phones which incidentally, law enforcement uses ever single day and even the FBI has used it to track those on January 6th. I think this is all explained in the movie, I know it has been explained over and over again by D’Sousa responding to this criticism.
Does not matter on bit what any stupid movie or claims are.
The state legislatures determine voting rules wihtin each state and those states violated that by letting the judicial branches of the administrative branches change election rules in those states.
Roberts (SCOTUS) destroyed the equal protection clause of the US Constitution by refusing to hear the case.
TX etal V PA.
I don’t know what he’s talking about. They showed faces of mules and showed some mules at more than one dropbox. Maybe he thought he watched the movie but he really didn’t?
I am guessing they have the video but would have made the documentary very long. These were people that dropped in 10 different boxes. Looking at perhaps a 5 or so long film. There is no explanation for these mules doing what they did so for me no need for a rebuttal. I haven’t seen where but they did say after the documentary came out they would post the hours and hours of video so we could go through it and see them going to multiples and could also see others visiting less than 10. I haven’t seen if they have released it…
“...I voted for Libertarian Gary Johnson in 2016,
and Libertarian Jo Jorgensen in 2020...”
-
‘Nough said right there.
Aside from the people shown depositing in several drop boxes, there is also the fact that no way could they be sure that it was the same people at different drop boxes, even with cameras. Dishonest people change clothing and do things on different nights in different places if they are smart about being dishonest people, aside from being morally stupid.
This proves, once again, that having an education means you can still be as dumb as a box of rocks.
Yeah what was the reason to have Larry Elder, Charlie Kirk, Sebastian Gorka, Dennis Prager and Eric Metaxis in this so-called documentary? The only one who didn't swallow it whole and was non-commital was Prager (who is clearly the most intelligent of the bunch).
He must’ve watched the movie in denial.
Well, I graduated from Pitt in 1996 with a BS in Math. Then I earned a Master’s degree in Math from night school about 3 years later.
Finally, in 1978, I earned a PhD from Pitt in 1978 from the Physucs/Astronomy Dept. I proudly say I was a Pitt student for 17 years!
I will be watching 2000 Mules tomorrow with a friend, fraternity brother, also from Pitt and his wife, another Pitt Alumna.
I will let you know our opinion of the movie.
Voting for losertarian candidates and the “video footage” canard. Get thee hence, Dani.
There's been a nonstop, industry-wide media narrative about "false claims of election fraud" since November 2020 - and you criticize this movie for not providing "equal time to their opponents"? Are you serious?
You just jumped the shark, Danny boy...
I have a similar complaint after watching the film. I do believe the election was stolen, and probably there were thousands of mules trafficking ballots. But I did not recall seeing one video of the same person dropping off ballots to more than one dropbox or even the same one twice. If it’s there I don’t recall seeing it. If it is there, the director should have emphasized it better and made it clear. Further, if no such video was obtained, then they should have at least addressed why they believe such video was too scarce to obtain.
Also, if the claims are legit I would expect to hear of at least a few state authorities making arrests for voter fraud based on evidence provided by the filmmakers. Haven’t heard that yet.
My main reason for not pushing this film more is because it feels like the message is, “Trust us. The election was stolen.” The film was well-made and fairly persuasive. But I was hoping for more.
Like criticizing Solzhenitsen for failing to give the communists equal time, when the communists fully controlled the media, and everyone for all practical purposes, had the communist talking points memorized. The Democrat views are fully and easily available in the media around the clock, where liberals posing as conservatives are used as “balance” for the lib bias.
Read later.