Posted on 09/10/2023 1:40:53 AM PDT by spirited irish
Logical fallacy- just because the government is corrupt does not mean they caused 9/11.
Not directly.
Yes to inIndirectly when burning debris from the Towers broke the windows in Building 7 and started fires,
okey dokey
Nope - Fire caused the collapse
https://www.nist.gov/el/final-reports-nist-world-trade-center-disaster-investigation
Your logic to its ultimate conclusion.
The government is corrupt so everything bad that happens is caused by the government.
Building 6 was between WTC 1 and building 7 but not high enough to block debris.
pretty much
also there is the organic sin nature of man
if it is crime on a huge scale, then it requires organization, funding, resources, impossibility of just investigation and prosecution...
I just reread the declaration of independance. The time has come for choosing.
No it was a fire, aided by structural mis-design. The National Instute of Standards did an exhaustive report on it that looks very legitimate https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/NCSTAR/ncstar1a.pdf
Add climate change to the list!
“OMG I was stupid”
You’re not the only one. Stupid things I believed:
John Bolton was bad to the bone.
Dick Cheney was a die hard patriot.
George Bush did what he had to do after 9/11.
Even though Iraq was not involved in 9/11, we needed to kick somebody’s ass.
All of these beliefs were wrong wrong wrong.
I was fortunate to attend a presentation made by the forensic team on the fire and structural issues that resulted from the attack. This four hour presentation and discussion was made to about 250 professional engineers, contractors, architects and similar technical professionals. Every question, objection, second thought and speculation was brought up and aired out with no one walking away saying anything was brushed aside or not very well investigated.
https://www.independent.com/2009/09/17/elements-great-scientific-and-technical-dispute/
The mist report is far from the last word. There is legitimate opposition to the most assumptions and computer models.
The lack of evidence of thermite in the nist report is an interesting example.
Nist was presented evidence, and nist questioned the chain of custody. When challenged to run the same tests on nist’s own custody proven samples, nist refused.
Interesting, no?
Doesn’t everyone know that climate change and chem trails weaken steel beams in buildings, so when a fully loaded 757 jet plane traveling at over 500mph slams into a building it’s like a knife thru hot butter, the building didn’t stand a chance.
Remain gullible, it’s entertaining.
Okay, I’m not gonna watch a 90-minute video and there’s no synopsis that tells me what they think the problem is. Can anyone fill me in?
What finally opened your eyes?
For me was when Wikileaks released a planned map of Syria with oil pipelines going through it. This map was from US government. I felt sick to the stomach but I then realized what kind of people have been governing us.
I’m still furious that I let the media con me into believing them instead of my lying eyes. For 10 years I believed that crapola even though in my head I knew that a non pilot could never maneuver a jetliner like that, a plane could not fly into a steel building and a building could not possibly come down so perfectly by accident. To this day I still don’t want to believe that Dubya knew about it.
You are right, the power that the press holds over the American people is beyond belief. Once you turn it off and stay away from it for awhile and use your own discernment and information from other sources its not that hard to ferret out the truth.
Yes, i agree.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.