Posted on 09/10/2023 1:40:53 AM PDT by spirited irish
The thing that haunts me is what did they really do to those poor people who were on the planes?
I have refused to listen to any of that 911 day memorial stuff for years.
It’s horrible and they keep on doing this, like Maui. The media doesn’t report all these people missing who burned to death that were not given proper warning or turned back into the fire! 911 was to get us into war for theft of other countries’ resources, Maui is theft of people’s property. The media is dishonest.
The “Patriot Act” - a most unpatriotic thing that signaled the beginning of the end.
./\
Or as I refer to it
Gesetz zur Behebung der Not von Volk und Reich 2.0
The Enabling Act of 1933 2.0
\/
The Enabling Act allowed the National Ministry (essentially the cabinet) to enact legislation, including laws deviating from or altering the constitution, without the consent of the Reichstag. Because this law allowed for departures from the constitution, it was itself considered a constitutional amendment.
Jmho ymmv.
.
Yes if you just believe the exact opposite of what is being fed to you on MSM you will be right on the money.
This attack on Maui was at least two pronged. First there was a huge cyber attack on the space force cyber surveillance center on Maui. The press isn’t reporting that. Because they don’t want you to know that. Then The massive fire caused by DEWs to destroy an area that is the second most expensive property in the world. Now they’re in cover up mode.
This was a last ditch desperate black hat operation.
They weren't "non-pilots"; they were trained at U.S. flight schools, arguably the best in the world. They flew professional simulators in addition to desktop computer versions. Such training would allow for repeated attempts at maneuvers that a physical aircraft would only tolerate once.
Simulator training for some scenarios is far better than actual training since you can fly scenarios involving stalls, flat spins, maneuvers in icing conditions, takeoffs and landings in severe and/or gusting crosswinds, and bounced landing recovery that you would never willingly do in an actual aircraft.
As for the buildings coming down so perfectly, they were designed by the engineers to collapse straight down instead of toppling, in order to minimize impact if catastrophic failures occurred.
Building 7 gets questioned because it collapsed without having structural failures prior to the collapse but it may point to a fundamental issue that the buildings were not as fire-proof as presented to the public. It's New York City. Does anyone think a construction project there doesn't have corners cut and payoffs involved?
Look at other examples around the world of planes hitting buildings....
Or don’t look—you will feel a lot better if you don’t look.
I was against the Patriot Act from the beginning. I recognized it could do good. I also recognized the act would be used as a weapon against us, a very powerful weapon. This act has done far more bad than good.
I was right.
You are correct. The fire weaken the support columns. When one floor finally lost structural integrity it fell onto the floor below and also had all the weight of the floors above it. The towers "pancaked." Nothing could have saved the towers. Once the fire started they were doomed.
Were those other buildings also designed by Minoru Yamasaki? along with Emery Roth & Sons as associate architects?
Were those other buildings part of the "New Formalism" design that Minoru Yamasaki and Edward Stone practiced?
Were those other buildings designed with Minoru Yamasaki's trademark "Skylobby" elevator system that didn't use the traditional full-height shafts in a reinforced central core in the building?
Instead of using a centrally located cross-bracing system in the core of the building, Minoru Yamasaki and structural engineer Fazlur Khan employed an exterior truss system to decrease the need for large internal pillars to so each office floor was a vast open space unimpeded by support columns, ready to be subdivided as the tenants might choose. What would happen once the exterior truss systems was compromised? Were those other buildings built without a reinforced internal core but instead relied on an exterior truss system like the Twin Towers?
You and me both. The one thing I learned about the the deep state people is that they wrap all their wrongdoing in the flag and patriotism.
I don’t know what all happened to cause 9/11/2001 but I sure do not believe the official version. The whole travesty stinks to high heaven.
RIP to all the innocents who died for nothing that day.
I understand.
“What finally opened your eyes?”
I can’t point to anything specific. Just a progression of seeing that things we were told are not true. Like just about everything.
I’m a they allowed it happen person
Mr. GG2 is a former multi engine pilot and flight instructor. Think 737. He also worked as a line supervisor at Boeing building 747, 767 etc. As well as working on Air Force One.
He said on his best day he could not maneuver that plane to hit a trade center building and even if he could at the reported air speed and altitude the epinage would have sheared off as well as the wings.
And no you cannot fly a Budweiser can through steel and concrete so that it disappears into the building wings and all. Most of that plane should have slid down the side of the building into the street.
Bill Lear of Lear jets put 10 pilots with 5,000 hours plus in the best simulator of the day and not one of them could hit the buildings. Forget a bunch of beginner muslims. Its laughable.
The Muslims didn’t fly planes into those buildings. It was most likely holographic technology which the govt has had for quite awhile coupled with timed explosives.
A plane didn’t hit the Pentagon. It was either a drone or a missile. Mr. GG2 spotted the nose cone of a beech craft drone lying in front of the Pentagon in early footage. Then that footage disappeared and he couldn’t find it again. But interestingly enough that drone just managed out of a huge 5 sided building to fly into the wall where the office that was investigating where the $3 trillion went that the Pentagon couldn’t account for and burned all that paperwork up. How strange is that?
Face it our NWO satanic cabal govt did it. Likely Cheney and Bush Sr were in on it.
Who says the reported airspeed is true? The reported airspeed is likely a lie to give civilians a false sense of security. "That can only happen at incredibly fast speeds"
Bill Lear of Lear jets put 10 pilots with 5,000 hours plus in the best simulator of the day and not one of them could hit the buildings.
The Twin Towers were wider than the "captain's bars" on any given runway that pilots line up to land between, aiming for the centerline. Student pilots learn to land very close to the centerline and these pilots apparently practiced for two years before they struck.
It was most likely holographic technology which the govt has had for quite awhile coupled with timed explosives.
Yet actual phone calls from passengers to their loved ones told exactly what was happening. The terrorists insisted the passengers call their loved ones and tell them what was happening because the terrorists knew the Propaganda Media would lie.
A plane didn’t hit the Pentagon. It was either a drone or a missile. Mr. GG2 spotted the nose cone of a beech craft drone lying in front of the Pentagon in early footage. Then that footage disappeared and he couldn’t find it again.
A drone that may have possibly been trying to intercept it. There were F-16s scrambled as well. Rumor was the plane that was downed in Pennsylvania was shot down but you can't tell the public that.
...just managed out of a huge 5 sided building to fly into the wall where the office that was investigating where the $3 trillion went that the Pentagon couldn’t account for and burned all that paperwork up. How strange is that?
...or the paperwork wasn't even in the building but was claimed to be in order to cover up the $3T that went missing.
Face it our NWO satanic cabal govt did it. Likely Cheney and Bush Sr were in on it.
Possibly, but who did they have do it?
...and Sheik Omar Abdel-Rahman, the "Blind Sheik", swore that the Twin Towers would be attacked again after he failed in 1993 which wasn't holograms and timed explosives.
I take it you’re referring to a controlled demolition of the twin towers. I’ll ask you the same question I ask everyone whom I happen to converse with on this subject. No one, by the way, has been able to answer it.
Controlled demolitions are designed to bring a building down from the bottom up. There’s a reason they don’t do it from the top down, and that reason is because its uncontrollable.
Show me one instance of a controlled demolition from the top down, and you’ll have my ear.
Just one…
My question is, why did Bush get a pass, when he had been in office for nine months when it happened.
We all know damn well if a Rat was in office at the time, we would have raised holy hell, and said they were asleep at the wheel.
I honestly believe the government knew these terrorist were in the country and up to no good. They allowed them to continue their plot in order to get the Patriot act passed.
You can research the other buildings yourself.
There are lots of excuses for why the towers fell—that is all they are—excuses.
Just who is this "they" of whom you speak?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.