EPIC! Trump Buys New Glock in South Carolina Before Speaking at Event (VIDEO)

The Gateway Pundit ^ | September 25, 2023 | Jordan Conradson

[Vermont Lt]

Yes. That’s a good rule.

[Zhang Fei]

[So even if Trump has been indicted of a felony but not been found guilty,he can’t purchase a gun?]

---

Correct. It’s basically hysteria over street crime carried over into white collar indictments. If a person is potentially violent, due to a long rap sheet, the right step would be to detain him until trial. But lawmakers somehow leveraged this into a bar on all persons under felony indictment.

[maddog55]

He didn’t buy one.

[Macho MAGA Man]

Yea, apparently his spokesperson screwed up and posted he’d bought one.

[Bigg Red]

I think it was, “Kin I git me a huntin’ license here?”

[Chad C. Mulligan]

Well....It looks like fake news now

Hoplophobes hysterical anyway.

[M Kehoe]

True.

5.56mm

[justme4now]

I don’t think Trump buying a firearm is legal under the fed’s unconstitutional law?

[SoConPubbie]

PF Cheung must have been made aware of that fact after his dumb post.

What's wrong? Your hatred of President Trump got your panties in a twist?

[Ruy Dias de Bivar]

Careful! Is he a citizen of that state? Sure this is not a “set up” by the Dems to have something to scream about?

Never trust a democrat! I remember when photographers wanted to have Reagan photographed holding a terrifying looking “A-s-s-alt rifle!” Everyone sensed a trap and he did not do it.

[Observator]

'I'm going to buy one. I want to buy one,' Trump said after examining the weapon. 'Isn't glock a great gun?'

Yes it is Mr. President! On Sundays when I drink my little wine and eat my little cracker, I thank God for Glock!

[wiseprince]

Sounds like a dumb rule and actually should be considered unconstitutional. Why does an innocent man lose run rights upon accusation? Are you “innocent” until proven guilty or aren’t you? Is this a federal law?

[wiseprince]

He should actually run on repealing this nonsense. I bet you it’ll be worth 10% in a primary and would be a galvanizing point in a general. The law for indicted people should be deem unconstitutional.

[AlaskaErik]

He presumably had an FFL holder among his personal staff or Secret Service detail. From the Gun Control Act of 1968:

That would be a straw purchase, which is totally illegal.

[stars & stripes forever]

He didn’t buy it.

[Zathras]

Now THIS is the correct way to win an election.
Clinton went out to meet the people and won their hearts.
Trump should follow this model.

[Deplorable American1776]

On my F250 truck, I have a bumper sticker that reads: ‘I support LGBT. L IS Liberty, G is Guns B is Beer and T is Trump. 🤓

[Zhang Fei]

[That would be a straw purchase, which is totally illegal. ]

---

A Texas judge nullified the law against indictees being able to purchase guns. The FFL holder would be needed to transfer the gun for an interstate purchase. But, this is moot, because the purchase never occurred, as was clarified by Palmetto State Armory.

[Do_Tar]

Unless it’s about bump stocks or red flag laws.

[Blue Highway]

If that’s the case then expect the powers that be indict all gun owners and then boom it’s all suddenly illegal to own. That right there is their gun confiscation angle.