Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'B.C.' cartoon seen as slur of Islam <..Islamoparanoia Alert!..>
WorldNetDaily ^ | Nov. 22, 2003 | WorldNetDaily staff writer

Posted on 11/23/2003 1:07:20 PM PST by FatherOfLiberty


WND


'B.C.' cartoon seen as slur of Islam

Muslims allege veteran artist Hart made cryptic attack


Posted: November 22, 2003
1:00 a.m. Eastern


© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

The Council on American-Islamic Relations once again is demanding an apology for an alleged slur of Muslims, this time asserting a veteran cartoonist has cryptically defamed Islam.

The Washington, D.C.-based group sent out a dispatch to its e-mail list after a "B.C." cartoon last week by Johnny Hart was publicly questioned on a Washington Post Web chat page.

The cartoon shows a caveman entering an outhouse at night, and then saying, from inside, "Is it just me, or does it stink in here?"


The Post reader said the cartoon only made sense metaphorically, noting the strip contained a total of six crescent moons, and wondered if it might be a cryptic slur on Muslims.

Ibrahim Hooper, CAIR's spokesman, is sure it's a defamation of Islam.

"I think the reason there might not have been initial complaints is that it's so cryptic," he told the Post. "If you know who the cartoonist is, what he's done in the past, then it becomes clear. Otherwise, it's just an unfunny joke."

CAIR also is demanding an apology from radio counselor Dr. Laura Schlessinger for an alleged "anti-Muslim tirade" on her program this week.

Hart, 73, is known to be a devout Christian who often has communicated religious themes in his strip.

Along with the moons, CAIR's e-mail noted that Hart drew a sound effect – "SLAM" – between two frames to accompany the closing of the outhouse door. The SLAM, which was rendered vertically in the shape of an I, could be viewed as "Islam," CAIR said.

The group also noted the cartoon appeared on the 15th day of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

Hart and Creators Syndicate insist, however, the cartoon is just a simple joke that is being misunderstood.

"My goodness. That's incredible," Hart told the Post after hearing of CAIR's claims. "That's unbelievable!"

The cartoonist explained it as a silly bathroom joke. The SLAM simply depicted the caveman walking into the outhouse and the moons indicated it was nighttime. Also outhouses often are shown with crescent moons.

"This comic was in no way intended to be a message against Islam – subliminal or otherwise," he told the Post. "It would be contradictory to my own faith as a Christian to insult other people's beliefs. If you should have any further silly notions about malicious intent from this quarter, you can save yourself a phone call."

Several years ago, Hart drew protest from Jewish groups for an Easter Sunday strip that showed the candles of a Jewish menorah flickering out one by one alongside one of Jesus' last utterances. It culminated with the menorah turning into a cross and the words "It is finished." Hart insisted the cartoon was meant to honor both Judaism and Christianity.

The Post interviewed a number of analysts who believed Hart's outhouse strip was an intentional defamation of Islam.

Marshall Blonsky, professor of semiotics at the New School in New York, said for one thing, people don't slam outhouse doors.

An expert in the interpretation of signs and symbols, Blonsky said he didn't get the joke, and the cartoon makes sense only in light of the religious interpretation.

The paper also interviewed six leading cartoonists, who all admire Hart. Five of them thought the religious interpretation probably was right, including Berkeley Breathed, creator of "Bloom County" and "Opus," and Jef Mallett, creator of the nationally syndicated cartoon "Frazz."

Only Doonesbury's Garry Trudeau sided with Hart.

"We cartoonists are simple folk. We don't write on that cryptic a level," he told the Post. "Leave Johnny alone."

Blonsky opined that when it comes to artistic criticism, it is a mistake to give much weight at all to the artist's stated intention.

All that matters, he said, is the way people interpret it. Therefore, even if Hart intended no offense, the offense is there.

As WorldNetDaily reported, CAIR and another Muslim group demanded an apology last year from Pulitzer-prize winning political cartoonist Doug Marlette for his depiction of a Middle Eastern-looking man behind the steering wheel of a nuclear-bomb laden truck under the headline, "What would Muhammad drive?"

The cartoon shows a Ryder rental truck like the one used by convicted Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh.

Marlette told WorldNetDaily he would not apologize, though he had received thousands of e-mails from angry Muslims, with some threats of death and mutilation.


If you'd like to sound off on this issue, please take part in the WorldNetDaily poll.

Related stories:

Dr. Laura rebuked for 'anti-Muslim tirade'

'What would Muhammad drive?'


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Humor; Miscellaneous; Religion; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: cartoon; cavemen; crescentmoon; islam; islamoparanoia; nutcakes; nutcases; nutheads; outhouses; slami; slamming
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
They just keep getting nuttier all the time...
1 posted on 11/23/2003 1:07:21 PM PST by FatherOfLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
A little humor break brought to you by the "Religion of Peace (or, Pieces, as they would like us to be)".
2 posted on 11/23/2003 1:09:57 PM PST by FatherOfLiberty (Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FatherOfLiberty
BTTT
3 posted on 11/23/2003 1:21:54 PM PST by FatherOfLiberty (Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FatherOfLiberty
I must admit, using either interpretation it isn't a high point in the cartoonist's career.
4 posted on 11/23/2003 2:16:07 PM PST by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FatherOfLiberty
#1 they worship a moon rock.
#2 they think god will be reborn by a man.
#3 they have to check their stool with their unclean
hand to make sure they don't miss his birth.
5 posted on 11/23/2003 2:31:50 PM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Rush agrees with me 98.5% of the time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Restorer
It is kind of a lame cartoon, but you must admit that CAIR had to go to great extremes to extract their ridiculous interpretation.
6 posted on 11/23/2003 3:06:56 PM PST by FatherOfLiberty (Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FatherOfLiberty
Marlette told WorldNetDaily he would not apologize, though he had received thousands of e-mails from angry Muslims, with some threats of death and mutilation.

The religion of peace(TM) strikes again.

7 posted on 11/23/2003 3:14:22 PM PST by NeoCaveman (An official knuckle-dragging Neanderthal right wing turkey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
I think he meant it as a slur against Islam, knew nobody could prove it...and is laughing at this moment, as am I :)))
I think the cartoon is right on the money!!! Cheers for someone with cajones!!!
8 posted on 11/23/2003 3:50:43 PM PST by Indie ("Death was our business....and business was good" -MACVSOG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FatherOfLiberty
Yup.
9 posted on 11/23/2003 4:09:15 PM PST by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FatherOfLiberty
> "All that matters", he said, "is the way people interpret it. Therefore, even if Hart intended no offense, the offense is there."

Oh great.
Now it's not just what we SAY...
It's not what we MEAN...
It's whether somebody CAN COME UP WITH a possible bad interpretation...that's "all that matters".
Okay, I officially stop caring what people think at this point. :)
10 posted on 11/23/2003 6:06:26 PM PST by mishka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mishka
Now it's not just what we SAY...
It's not what we MEAN...
It's whether somebody CAN COME UP WITH a possible bad interpretation...that's "all that matters".

That's the crux of the whole "hate crime" problem. There is a judgment of what you were "thinking" at the time, really making it a "thought crime". It doesn't matter what you were really thinking, it just matters what someone else THOUGHT you were thinking.

Orwellian.

11 posted on 11/23/2003 7:55:08 PM PST by FatherOfLiberty (Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
#3 they have to check their stool with their unclean hand to make sure they don't miss his birth.

Is there some teaching/regulation in Islam about which hand to use to wipe? (this is a serious question)

12 posted on 11/23/2003 7:58:28 PM PST by FatherOfLiberty (Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FatherOfLiberty
Left
The left is always unclean.
13 posted on 11/23/2003 8:36:51 PM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Rush agrees with me 98.5% of the time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
What if their left arm was amputated in a failed suicide bombing attack? Could they then wipe with their right? Would they have to get someone else to wipe? Could an Imam give a special dispensation for them to use their right? Inquiring minds want to know.
14 posted on 11/23/2003 8:53:36 PM PST by FatherOfLiberty (Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FatherOfLiberty
I have reached the limit of what I was told by a moslim
in Algeria 30 years ago.
15 posted on 11/23/2003 9:07:36 PM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Rush agrees with me 98.5% of the time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FatherOfLiberty
Marshall Blonsky, professor of semiotics at the New School in New York, said for one thing, people don't slam outhouse doors.

I suppose this professor has a lot of experience with this??? What a ridiculous statement!

16 posted on 11/23/2003 10:31:18 PM PST by exDemMom (Happy to be on the side of light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom
Maybe the cartoon caveman was angry because he wasn't as in-touch with his inner self as this professor - so he slammed the door. Perhaps the door was spring-loaded, hence the slam. Quite honestly, this is the deepest I've ever tried to analyze a cartoon.

I guess if you are a professor of semiotics, you aren't much use to anyone is society, so you have to make idiotic statements about some cartoon character to remove all doubt.

17 posted on 11/23/2003 10:56:17 PM PST by FatherOfLiberty (Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: FatherOfLiberty
So I guess the religion of peace will now issue a fatwah on him. Maybe he can get some advice from Salaman Rushdie
18 posted on 11/23/2003 11:55:31 PM PST by metalboy (I`m still waiting for the mass protests against Al Qaida and Saddam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FatherOfLiberty
So I guess the religion of peace will now issue a fatwah on him. Maybe he can get some advice from Salaman Rushdie
19 posted on 11/23/2003 11:55:31 PM PST by metalboy (I`m still waiting for the mass protests against Al Qaida and Saddam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: phasma proeliator
Ping
20 posted on 11/24/2003 12:20:40 AM PST by da_toolman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson