Posted on 10/30/2004 7:37:15 PM PDT by tirednvirginia
I am watching Geraldo and he interviewed Col Hunt. They were discussing the "missing" weapons. Hunt implied there were many more missing weapons and that it was due to poor planning for the peace. He said it was causing the deaths of some soldiers and was embarrasing for the Bush Administration. He said they needed many more troops in Iraq. When did he turn against President Bush?
Maybe that's his honest opinion. He seems like a man of integrity to me.
I love President Bush. I love our military, but mistakes were made.
They always will be in war. I'm with the other poster, Col. Hunt is a man of integrity.
In the past, I thought he was a strong supporter of President Bush's war on terror. One would think as a military man, he would not criticize the Commander-in-Chief during a time of war unless he has made a 180 degree turn.
Hackworth and Goldwater come to mind right away.
Leni
Are you objecting to his comments, or just his making them close to Election Tuesday?
Perhaps he sees his first loyalty as to the troops.
Hunt should know that efforts were made at Ka-Ka to bulldoze berms up against bunkers that were not emptied and that it was not a major source for contraband weapons.
There were 10,000 caches all over Iraq.
1968?
That is a lie. They test the residue of explosions and these munitions have not been used.
We have a whole thread over on the news/activism board on this whole Col Hunt turncoat performance tonight.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1263290/posts?q=1&&page=1#1
Hunt may have integrity and even be very sincere but inho he is sincerely wrong much if not all of the time.
Hunt is from BOSTON BOSTON BOSTON
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.