Posted on 12/17/2004 5:39:21 AM PST by KMC1
BARE NAKED TRUTH: According to the Associated Press former Baywatch star Pamela Anderson came to the "controversial" decision to bare it all for some upcoming Chinese billboards on behalf of PETA's "fur is dead" campaign.
The only thing intriguing about the story is Pamela's quote:
"I'm perfectly happy to bare my skin if it will help save animals' skins," Anderson said.
I find it interesting that she will only do this "for a good cause".
It is hypocritical on two levels... 1) Since when has Anderson ever needed a good cause to remove her clothing? But secondly and much more importantly 2) How does she define good causes?
Animal skins are worth shredding your dignity and decency for - but the lives of children aren't? The slaughter of animals (who are not eternal beings - and have no souls) has taken a higher MORAL value in our culture than the lives of our fellow human beings.
Abortion on demand, partial birth abortion, and the less well known - born alive abortion - have taken the lives of nearly two generations of PEOPLE yet we have not seen the cry of one major figure from the "pretty people class" (with perhaps exception to Mel Gibson) that have been willing to do something "shocking" to save HUMANS...SAD! ...very, very, sad...
(Excerpt) Read more at kmclive.com ...
Well, she certainly wasn't going to convince anyone with her intellect. This is the only tool in her toolbox.
All I am reminded of from this is that line from "A League of the their own" when Rosie O'donnel tells Madonna... something along the lines "like there are folks in america that haven't seen your boobs".
Wow, another naked photo of Pamela Anderson.... Like I haven't seen one of those.... The only thing shocking about Pamela Anderson and Nudity is that there is ever a time when she has her clothes on.
She was one of them.
That is one nasty..., uh, person without all the pancake on.
Even with it on, she's pretty nasty.
And for all you old lechers out there that will come back and insist that she's God's gift to mankind, just remember the old saw about beauty being skin deep.
Oh, yeah, the pic of Kirstie Alley had nothing to do with makeup.
Besides, it would take a few tons of industrial strength makeup to cover up that huge posterior.
Bleccch!
Most. Everrated. Ever.
Overrated...spellcheck!
Yes Pamela is against fur. I noticed that when she spread her legs in that Tommy Lee video.
"A beautiful woman lacking discretion is like a fine gold ring in the snout of a pig"
Proverbs 11:22
http://biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=24&chapter=11&verse=22&version=31;49
...I have to ask...
But does your post mean it would be ok for her to get naked for Pro-Lifers? For a good cause?
I'm sorry, but that is kind of how you worded it! :)
I'm not sure why PETA chose Pam, again based on the video. She is clearly against fur, but you can see she has no compunction whatsoever about eating meat.
I have a one eyed snake she can help save.
There was no need. They pasted her face onto an airbrushed, excessively thin, and probably digitally created mannequin - that's not her real body in the photo ;)
This is actually good news. This is what "free trade" is all about. We import Chinese goods, and we export our Leftist Lunacy. This is like sending in the scouts and snipers before sending in the artillery and mechanized. Soon we will be exporting the greatest threat to mankind to all at them - laywers. Lawyers need cases, and they need to prepare the population for economy stifling, culture destroying, moral degrading lawsuits and "movements". In a few years, China will be reduced to ruins as lawyers and other assorted leftists ban the production of energy, demand that caps are placed over industrial smokestacks, rivers are cleaned beyond what nature provided, and that every man needs his own naked boy. Instead of the Chinese having their "Year of the Rat" or "Year of the Monkey", these same people will demand changes like "Year of the Kangaroo Rat" and "Year of the Spotted Owl".
Pam Anderson isn't all that, really. She's below average without makeup and is not aging well--without makeup she looks older than her actual age which I think is mid-30s.
She's the most overrated hottie since Madonna in the late 80s and I've never really found her attractive, or even remotely intelligent. Debbie Dunning, who replaced her on "Home Improvement" is far better looking.
Gravity, Pamela. Gravity. Coming to a decolletage near you.
Thank you. ;^)
She was one of them.
That is one nasty..., uh, person without all the pancake on.
Even with it on, she's pretty nasty."
Pamela Anderson may be a clueless bimbo, but "nasty" is not what comes to mind even without make-up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
