Skip to comments.
Extremist gays using Wikipedia to push their agenda
Posted on 02/13/2006 6:24:53 PM PST by Lou Franklin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: Lou Franklin
hmm.. time to coin a word...
the wikihomojadeen?
what does a pink headscarf look like?
2
posted on
02/13/2006 6:28:32 PM PST
by
xcamel
(One should hope Global Dumbing is reversible.)
To: Lou Franklin
3
posted on
02/13/2006 6:34:52 PM PST
by
jdm
(You can learn a lot about paranoids just by following them around.)
To: Lou Franklin
Here's how you do it (to Wikipedia). First of all, write up what it is you wish to say. Put that on a Wordpad or something similar.
Secondly, open a window to a part of Wikipedia where you think that stuff might fit. It does not have to be "germane" ~ simply a place you think it might physically fit. Select a paragraph and insert your material in it.
Repeat the operation several hundred times until you have so many windows open your computer can't handle it.
You then start filing and saving your change until you've gone through all the open windows.
The bad boys who don't want nasty things said of homosexuality will be overwhelmed.
4
posted on
02/13/2006 6:34:58 PM PST
by
muawiyah
(-)
To: Lou Franklin
Welcome to FRee Republic - tomorrow!
5
posted on
02/13/2006 6:35:17 PM PST
by
Toby06
(Hindsight alone is not wisdom, and second-guessing is not a strategy)
To: Toby06
"Welcome to FRee Republic - tomorrow!"
He's got a head start on Valentine's Day.
6
posted on
02/13/2006 6:35:58 PM PST
by
jdm
(You can learn a lot about paranoids just by following them around.)
To: jdm
C'mon, you really think so?
7
posted on
02/13/2006 6:36:17 PM PST
by
Toby06
(Hindsight alone is not wisdom, and second-guessing is not a strategy)
To: Lou Franklin
"Only myself and one other guy voted to remove the article."
Irony!!!!
8
posted on
02/13/2006 6:36:49 PM PST
by
jdm
(You can learn a lot about paranoids just by following them around.)
To: Toby06
I don't know, to be honest. It is kind of an unusual first post.
9
posted on
02/13/2006 6:37:21 PM PST
by
jdm
(You can learn a lot about paranoids just by following them around.)
To: Lou Franklin
The concept of WikiPedia is insanity to begin with. Truth is never dependent on public opinion.
If WikiPedia existed in the 1400's, the Earth would still be flat.
10
posted on
02/13/2006 6:38:13 PM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Islam is a fatal disease that must be eradicated from the body Earth.)
To: jdm
But it has proper grammar, spelling, sentence and paragraph construction, and strongly supports what i consider conservative principles without hint of trollishmness.
May be a long time lurker who is finally fed up enough to post this.
11
posted on
02/13/2006 6:39:00 PM PST
by
Toby06
(Hindsight alone is not wisdom, and second-guessing is not a strategy)
To: Toby06
Wish my spelling were perfect!
12
posted on
02/13/2006 6:39:50 PM PST
by
Toby06
(Hindsight alone is not wisdom, and second-guessing is not a strategy)
To: Lou Franklin
On Wikipedia you "vote" on whether an article gets removed. So, what's the issue? You couldn't garner enough votes. If article content gets decided by majority rule, and not on accuracy then Wikipedia is a stupid site. Why bother trying to change it?
13
posted on
02/13/2006 6:40:51 PM PST
by
Casloy
To: Lou Franklin
I don't imagine there are any articles on Wikipedia about, say:
Real data on the actual numbers of homosexuals in the population (2-3% vs. the legendary "10%") Homosexuals who have changed their orientation to heterosexual
The strong statistical correlation between childhood sexual abuse of girls and lesbianism later in life.
14
posted on
02/13/2006 6:41:01 PM PST
by
denydenydeny
("Osama... made the mistake of confusing media conventional wisdom with reality" (Mark Steyn))
To: Lou Franklin
The moral of this story is ... Wicked-pedia isn't a legit source to cite when researching the subject of homosexuality. (or any other subject for that matter).
Like you said though, young impressionable skulls of mush won't know any better.
15
posted on
02/13/2006 6:42:30 PM PST
by
DirtyHarryY2K
("Ye shall know them by their fruits" ;-))
To: jdm
""Only myself and one other guy voted to remove the article."
"What are you saying? w-w-w-whattya mean?"
So it's an "article" now?
To: Lou Franklin; AFA-Michigan; AggieCPA; Agitate; AliVeritas; AllTheRage; An American In Dairyland; ...
17
posted on
02/13/2006 6:46:37 PM PST
by
scripter
("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
To: Lou Franklin
18
posted on
02/13/2006 6:47:28 PM PST
by
DirtyHarryY2K
("Ye shall know them by their fruits" ;-))
To: Lou Franklin
19
posted on
02/13/2006 6:48:56 PM PST
by
scripter
("You don't have a soul. You are a soul. You have a body." - C.S. Lewis)
To: scripter
I was just about to ping this one out, I was waiting to see if the Mods were going to get out the hook. First post being a vanity and all.
20
posted on
02/13/2006 6:50:20 PM PST
by
DirtyHarryY2K
("Ye shall know them by their fruits" ;-))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson