[Mia T]

In these perilous times, prioritizing isn't optional. It's crucial. If Rudy wants to go after the terrorists (both here and abroad) in high heels--hey--that's fine with me. ;)

Contrast this with clinton, who dispensed sugar pills (or bombs) at the drop of a high-heeled shoe... or at the hint of high treason... (The Real Danger of a Fake President: Post-9/11 Reconsideration of The Placebo President)

[Mia T]

WIGS, POWDER , THE PRESIDENCY AND RUDY:

A president's precedents. Consider George Washington.

Wigs were de rigueur in Washington's times. Indeed, stature was directly proportional to wig size.

Although Washington, himself, didn't wear a wig--the ponytail was all his--he did powder his locks.

As opposed to a chintzed-and-powdered hillary:

[C]onsider missus clinton's recent 'conversation' (with herself).

It was risible. Unintentional theater of the absurd: A chintzed-and-powdered villain, a soulless, angry, arrogant scold, oozing cloying, saccharine-coated evil, pulsating to the metronomic swing of stubby appendages--claws too short to grab its prey.

(Gesticulation is a dud's only sign of life... and then only if she has a speech coach to prod her.)

... We have argued elsewhere that the only way missus clinton can win elections is to run virtually unopposed, and then only if she remains immobil, hidden, mute, a prisoner of her own ineptitude, repulsiveness and criminality.

But of the three, it is missus clinton's repulsiveness--her ugliness--that will do her in.

The voters routinely ignore ineptitude, forgive criminality, but they never abide ugliness. Never.

HILLARY!
Can a chintzed-and-powdered villain win the White House?
LEADING INDICATORS SAY 'NO'
MISSUS CLINTON'S SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE PROBLEM - PART FIVE
CLINTON-GEFFEN IMBROGLIO-PART SIX
by Mia T, 3.01.07