Posted on 06/24/2007 1:11:02 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Lawmakers in Canada appear to be paving the way for "deep integration" with the U.S. and Mexico with a proposed measure that advances the controversial Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America promoted by the Bush administration, notes WND columnist Jerome Corsi.
It's an issue Corsi has fully investigated for his newest book, "The Late Great USA."
The conservative minority government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper is pressing for "The Trade, Investment and Labour Mobility Agreement", which would enable a Canadian company to challenge laws in provinces that block the North American Free Trade Agreement.
Murray Dobbin, a Vancouver author and journalist critical of SPP, argued in an article titled, "The Plan to Disappear Canada – 'Deep Integration' comes out of the shadows," the secretive trilateral bureaucratic working groups organized under the auspices of SPP are "harmonizing" virtually every important area of public policy with the U.S., including "defense, foreign policy, energy (they get security, we get greenhouse gases), culture, social policy, tax policy, drug testing and safety and much more."
The proposed legislation would allow companies that believe provincial laws and regulations harm their NAFTA rights to demand up to $5 million in compensatory damages for each violation.
When fully implemented, Dobbin argues, "TILMA would allow challenges to the location and size of commercial signs, environmental set-backs for developers, zoning, building height restrictions, pesticide bans, and green space requirements in urban areas. It also would allow challenges to restrictions on private health clinics, halt stricter rules for nursing homes and almost certainly overturn the current ban on junk food in British Columbia schools."
The controversy over SPP broke into the mainstream in Canada last month when Tory Member of Parliament Leon Benoit walked out of a House of Commons International Trade Committee hearing in protest to a leftist professor who wanted to air his objections to "deep integration" with the U.S.
The professor, Gordon Laxer of the University of Alberta, was about to explain to the committee his theory that SPP involves a U.S. grab of Canada's energy resources when Benoit adjourned the meeting and bolted out of the room, preventing the Canadian mainstream press from hearing and reporting the professor's arguments.
Laxer, nevertheless, published his testimony in the nationally read Globe and Mail newspaper.
Laxar has objected to the closed-door meeting roundtables of Canadian business and corporate elite held in Calgary by the Washington-based think tank the Center for Strategic and International Studies, or CSIS, as part of its "North American Future 2025 Project."
WND previously reported two activist groups, the Council of Canadians and the Coalition for Water Aid, are protesting that the CSIS research project involves a massive grab by the U.S. of Canadian fresh water, estimated to be one-fifth of the world's supply.
WND also has reported the CSIS, chaired by former Sen. Sam Nunn and guided by trustees including Richard Armitage, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Harold Brown, William Cohen and Henry Kissinger, is planning to present its "North American Future 2025" final report to the governments of Mexico, Canada and the U.S. by Sept. 30. The report is expected to recommend the benefits of integrating the U.S., Mexico and Canada into one political economic and security bloc.
Canadian activists are preparing to protest the third summit meeting of the SPP, scheduled for Aug. 20 and 21 in Montebello, Quebec.
Just do me one favor. When you finally get off your ass, please link or post to this thread with your response. See, what happens when I argue with amateurs and they try to pull this stunt, they count on the passage of time obscuring the original argument.
amateurs argue without reading documents and then claim, or act as if, they’re the “expert opinion” on matters about which they are willfully ignorant.
Sorry, but I always educate myself fully first before I form concrete opinions on matters.
Let us know when you educate yourself. LOL!
You’re an ignoramous.
Even children could see that.
As well as the Soviet style “disappearance” of millions of conservatives. See you folks in the gulags!
“By leveraging both the U.S. and Mexican governments and taking advantage of the terms of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), big capital is developing container terminals in Mexico and using that country as a land bridge and labor pool to deliver shipping containers to destinations in the United States at discount prices.”
OMG! This is happening now? Maybe the NAU is already in effect?
>>Being paid union scale is a constitutional protection?
Only in New Jersey. :^p
>>Maybe the NAU is already in effect?
Implementing the NAU will increase the size and efficiency of the operation.
So will developing bigger container terminals in Mexico. Why combine Mexico with the US? Won't that raise incomes in Mexico? Won't that make it more expensive to ship those containers to the US?
>>Won’t that raise incomes in Mexico?
Not paying U.S. wages will more than cover that cost.
Not paying U.S. wages where?
>>Not paying U.S. wages where?
In the U.S., of course.
You ask why do they “need” the NAU.
Why does any greedy glutton do what they do? Nothing is never enough to satiate the tyranny of their appetite.
Why will they not pay US wages in the US?
"Even though the NAFTA route from the center of the Pacific Rim, Shanghai, including its overseas voyage, is almost 2,000 miles longer, a 30 percent increase in mileage, a 15 percent savings over LA or Long Beach arrival is being promised to customers. That’s the capitalists’ bottom line."
They won't pay US wages to port workers in other countries. So what? They don't need the NAU to hire cheaper workers in foreign ports now.
Now lets go back to the question of motivation.
They want the NAU so they can do something they can do right now. Today. Got it. LOL!
Tell us, why do YOU think they need the NAU?
I think Corsi needs the NAU to sell books. Did you get your autographed copy yet?
Let's use your Citigroup definition. US GDP is 88% of combined "NAU" GDP. The US will get 88% of the shares in the NAU. Like I said, mostly controlled.
The road won't be built unless the NAU is in charge? And what do you mean paid for by tax-payers? That evil foreign company, CINTRA, is paying for the road.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.