Bill paves way for Canada's 'disappearance' (integration with U.S. and Mexico)

World Net Daily ^ | June 23, 2007

[1rudeboy]

Just do me one favor. When you finally get off your ass, please link or post to this thread with your response. See, what happens when I argue with amateurs and they try to pull this stunt, they count on the passage of time obscuring the original argument.

[nicmarlo]

amateurs argue without reading documents and then claim, or act as if, they’re the “expert opinion” on matters about which they are willfully ignorant.

Sorry, but I always educate myself fully first before I form concrete opinions on matters.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Sorry, but I always educate myself fully first before I form concrete opinions on matters.

Let us know when you educate yourself. LOL!

[nicmarlo]

You’re an ignoramous.

Even children could see that.

[GOP_Raider]

As well as the Soviet style “disappearance” of millions of conservatives. See you folks in the gulags!

[VxH]

[To eliminate our Constitution and merge us with 2 other countries who don't want to merge with us?]

 

Welcome to the globalist "The world is our ant-farm" vision. 

 

[Why do they need the NAU to take advantage of lower wages in other countries?]

 

They don't "need" it, other than to improve profit margins.

 

“By leveraging both the U.S. and Mexican governments and taking advantage of the terms of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), big capital is developing container terminals in Mexico and using that country as a land bridge and labor pool to deliver shipping containers to destinations in the United States at discount prices.”

http://www.onlinejournal.com/artman/publish/article_1883.shtml

 

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

“By leveraging both the U.S. and Mexican governments and taking advantage of the terms of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), big capital is developing container terminals in Mexico and using that country as a land bridge and labor pool to deliver shipping containers to destinations in the United States at discount prices.”

OMG! This is happening now? Maybe the NAU is already in effect?

[VxH]

>>Being paid union scale is a constitutional protection?

Only in New Jersey. :^p

[VxH]

>>Maybe the NAU is already in effect?

Implementing the NAU will increase the size and efficiency of the operation.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Implementing the NAU will increase the size and efficiency of the operation.

So will developing bigger container terminals in Mexico. Why combine Mexico with the US? Won't that raise incomes in Mexico? Won't that make it more expensive to ship those containers to the US?

[VxH]

>>Won’t that raise incomes in Mexico?

Not paying U.S. wages will more than cover that cost.

[Toddsterpatriot]

Not paying U.S. wages will more than cover that cost.

Not paying U.S. wages where?

[VxH]

>>Not paying U.S. wages where?

In the U.S., of course.

You ask why do they “need” the NAU.

Why does any greedy glutton do what they do? Nothing is never enough to satiate the tyranny of their appetite.

[Toddsterpatriot]

In the U.S., of course.

Why will they not pay US wages in the US?

[VxH]

>>Why will they not pay US wages in the US?

 

Because container traffic will be diverted from U.S. ports to ports in Central/South America.

 

"Even though the NAFTA route from the center of the Pacific Rim, Shanghai, including its overseas voyage, is almost 2,000 miles longer, a 30 percent increase in mileage, a 15 percent savings over LA or Long Beach arrival is being promised to customers. That’s the capitalists’ bottom line."

 

Now  lets  go back to the question of motivation.   I think Oligarchs "need" the NAU for the same reason other gluttons "need" another quart of ice cream. 

 

They simply can't control their appetites.

 

Tell us, why do YOU think they need the NAU?

[Toddsterpatriot]

Because container traffic will be diverted from U.S. ports to ports in Central/South America.

They won't pay US wages to port workers in other countries. So what? They don't need the NAU to hire cheaper workers in foreign ports now.

Now lets go back to the question of motivation.

They want the NAU so they can do something they can do right now. Today. Got it. LOL!

Tell us, why do YOU think they need the NAU?

I think Corsi needs the NAU to sell books. Did you get your autographed copy yet?

[VxH]

>>"mostly controlled by the US"

 

Define "controlled".

 

Will the globalist corporations that benefit from the NAU be controlled in the same way that Citigroup is "controlled" by the US?

 

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Define "controlled".

Let's use your Citigroup definition. US GDP is 88% of combined "NAU" GDP. The US will get 88% of the shares in the NAU. Like I said, mostly controlled.

[VxH]

[They don't need the NAU to hire cheaper workers in foreign ports now.]

 

The NAU will facilitate the transport of those containers into the U.S. at lower cost - on a super highway paid for by U.S. Tax-Payers.  Are the Oligarchs going to pay for the construction of the Super Highway?

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52684

 

 

 

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The NAU will facilitate the transport of those containers into the U.S. at lower cost - on a super highway paid for by U.S. Tax-Payers.

The road won't be built unless the NAU is in charge? And what do you mean paid for by tax-payers? That evil foreign company, CINTRA, is paying for the road.