To: Soliton
No, they aren’t. Especially when they are allowed to set the rules for what is and what isn’t “science.”
11 posted on
10/24/2008 9:43:09 PM PDT by
LiteKeeper
(Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
To: LiteKeeper
No, they aren’t. Especially when they are allowed to set the rules for what is and what isn’t “science.” So who else but scientists should set the rules of how science is conducted?
I can't believe you are serious about wanting anti-science fundamentalists to have a say in how something they hate is conducted. Analogies would be criminals helping run the police departments and arsonists telling firefighters how to do their jobs.
12 posted on
10/24/2008 9:47:27 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: LiteKeeper
No, they aren’t. Especially when they are allowed to set the rules for what is and what isn’t “science.”You are a smart guy. You know that "science" has a definition and a well defined methodology. It hasn't been changed for evolution or ID.
14 posted on
10/25/2008 3:32:15 AM PDT by
Soliton
(Faith is an act of love; Love is an act of faith)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson