Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fungi-Infested Violin Beats Strad
livescience ^ | October 2009 | Jeanna Bryner

Posted on 10/06/2009 3:49:42 PM PDT by JoeProBono

A violin made of wood treated with a fungus just bested the real McCoy — a Stradivarius crafted by the great master himself in 1711 — in a sound test in front of 180 people.

The fungi-infested violins were created by Francis Schwarze of the Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Testing and Research and the Swiss violin maker Michael Rhonheimer.

In the test, which took place at a conference on forest husbandry in Germany (called “Osnabrücker Baumpflegetagen"), British violinist Matthew Trusler played five different instruments behind a curtain to keep the audience blinded.

Trusler played his own strad (worth $2 million) and four violins made by Rhonheimer, two of which were made with fungally-treated wood. A jury of experts, together with the conference participants, judged the tone quality of the violins.

Out of the more than 180 attendees, 90 indicated the tone of the fungally treated violin, Opus 58, to be the best. Trusler's stradivarius snagged second place with 39 votes. And surprisingly, 113 attendees thought the Opus 58 was actually the strad......

(Excerpt) Read more at livescience.com ...


TOPICS: Music/Entertainment; Science; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: fungi; strad; stradivarius; violin

The five instruments played during a sound test in Germany, including two made from wood treated with fungi and a stradivarius. (Visually, there is very little difference between them.) Credit: Egmont Seiler.


1 posted on 10/06/2009 3:49:43 PM PDT by JoeProBono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

2 posted on 10/06/2009 3:53:44 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

In so many ways this is awesome. I thought the woods necessary to make a fine instrument are not to be found anymore, so a great substitute is a minor miracle.


3 posted on 10/06/2009 3:57:02 PM PDT by CodeToad (If it weren't for physics and law enforcement I'd be unstoppable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

These brief listening tests are not reliable. In order to fully prove this, they would have to listen to a wide variety of music on each violin over a period of weeks or months.


4 posted on 10/06/2009 3:58:13 PM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Most of the wood for the Strads grew during the “Little Ice Age” and had small tight growth rings.


5 posted on 10/06/2009 4:00:51 PM PDT by WellyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
we're trusting a sound test from people who can hear words like “Osnabrücker Baumpflegetagen" and think it sounds correct?

;)

6 posted on 10/06/2009 4:01:40 PM PDT by ZinGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
Well, it would certainly make Christmas much easier for the musician in your life.


7 posted on 10/06/2009 4:36:19 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Hey Obama. Where is Osama Bin Laden?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono; CodeToad

I’d be curious to see a blind comparison between the Strads and those crazy carbon fiber violins.

I’m surprised that a material so different would have the same sound characteristics, but apparently they sound very very good.

And because they’re so strong, they need none of the energy-robbing internal bracing wood requires, so they’re very clean and loud (plus you can drop them down the stairs without ruining them).

http://www.luisandclark.com/


8 posted on 10/06/2009 4:45:22 PM PDT by BobbyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
This sort of test has been done on audiophile and musical instrument websites forever. Some of them are "Which is the real 1959 Les Paul, which is the 1959 Reissue (built in 2003)." Others are "which is the real 1968 Marshall 50 watt amp, which is the Line6 modeler?" My favorite was the "which is the $100 per foot speaker wire, which is a coathanger (literally, a coathanger wire...)"

The results are always the same. The "better" instrument never wins a clear majority, and sometimes is upset by the "lesser," as was the case in the speaker wire test. A majority of listeners actually preferred the sound of coathanger wire to $100 per foot high-end audiophile speaker wire.

The important thing to come away with is this: The vast majority of people can't tell the difference. If you can, then by all means, spend twenty times the money to get that extra one-half of one percent of tone.

9 posted on 10/06/2009 4:55:21 PM PDT by Terabitten (Vets wrote a blank check, payable to the Constitution, for an amount up to and including their life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson