Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army drops bayonets, busts abs in training revamp
AP-Yahoo! ^ | March 16, 2010 | SUSANNE M. SCHAFER

Posted on 03/16/2010 11:10:13 AM PDT by greatdefender

FORT JACKSON, S.C. – New soldiers are grunting through the kind of stretches and twists found in "ab blaster" classes at suburban gyms as the Army revamps its basic training regimen for the first time in three decades.

Heeding the advice of Iraq and Afghanistan combat veterans, commanders are dropping five-mile runs and bayonet drills in favor of zigzag sprints and exercises that hone core muscles. Battlefield sergeants say that's the kind of fitness needed to dodge across alleys, walk patrol with heavy packs and body armor or haul a buddy out of a burning vehicle.

Trainers also want to toughen recruits who are often more familiar with Facebook than fistfights.

"Soldiers need to be able to move quickly under load, to be mobile under load, with your body armor, your weapons and your helmet, in a stressful situation," said Frank Palkoska, head of the Army's Fitness School at Fort Jackson, which has worked several years on overhauling the regime.

"We geared all of our calisthenics, all of our running movements, all of our warrior skills, so soldiers can become stronger, more powerful and more speed driven," Palkoska said. The exercises are part of the first major overhaul in Army basic fitness training since men and women began training together in 1980, he said.

The new plan is being expanded this month at the Army's four other basic training installations — Fort Leonard Wood, Mo., Fort Sill, Okla., Fort Benning, Ga., and Fort Knox, Ky.

Drill sergeants with experience in the current wars are credited with urging the Army to change training, in particular to build up core muscle strength. One of them is 1st Sgt. Michael Todd, a veteran of seven deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Education; Military/Veterans; Sports
KEYWORDS: army; pt; training
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 03/16/2010 11:10:13 AM PDT by greatdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

Finally... some good news today

All those wimpifications of the military to allow females to pass the physical training may have atually costs some lives LIKE WE SAID IT WOULD 30 years ago.....


2 posted on 03/16/2010 11:13:22 AM PDT by Mr. K (This administration IS WEARING OUT MY CAPSLOCK KEY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender
"We geared all of our calisthenics, all of our running movements, all of our warrior skills, so soldiers can become stronger, more powerful and more speed driven," Palkoska said.

If they get into extremely close quarters fighting perhaps they'll be able to run the enemy through with the edge of their hand.

3 posted on 03/16/2010 11:13:30 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

So they are doing away with separate PT standards for men and women?

I still say, if you want “equality”, have the sexes seperated into all female/male units, both subject to the combat AND the draft. Anything less is jibba-jabba.


4 posted on 03/16/2010 11:15:49 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (ACORN:American Corruption for Obama Right Now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

I can see a bayonet training range from where I am right now.


5 posted on 03/16/2010 11:19:23 AM PDT by KC Burke (...but He has made the trains run on time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

So, they are being trained more like Marines?


6 posted on 03/16/2010 11:20:59 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Hypocrisy: "Animal rightists" who eat meat & pen up pets while accusing hog farmers of cruelty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

I can see dropping the drills, but keeping the bayonet. Everybody knows a big stealthy knife, be it a bayonet or otherwise, is indispensable.


7 posted on 03/16/2010 11:23:39 AM PDT by Tarpon ( ...Rude crude socialist Obama depends on ignorance to force his will on people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

Dumbing down physical training for coed PC training. The Marines do not train this way. Eliminating 5 mile runs in favor of sprints. Predicated that endurance would never be needed, extraction or support by mechanized units that might not be there in combat. Stupid. Train for worst case.

No more bayonets? Of what should an enemy be afraid in the final close combat. Answer: we now fight by Predator? Marines fortunately do not basic train this way. Assume you have no support- you are a warrior. An Army of One, indeed.


8 posted on 03/16/2010 11:25:14 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke

>I can see a bayonet training range from where I am right now.

Are you watching C-SPAN?


9 posted on 03/16/2010 11:25:37 AM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: John S Mosby
No more bayonets? Of what should an enemy be afraid in the final close combat.

The reality is that bayonets haven't been of much use since the Civil War. I would be surprised if anyone has been killed by a rifle-mounted bayonet anywhere in Iraq or Afghanistan.

10 posted on 03/16/2010 11:32:45 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender

We did the Run, dodge, and Jump, the inverted crawl, and the horizontal ladder , in addition to the push-ups, sit-ups and 2 mile run back in the 70’s. The Army just got lazy, and fat.

Never had bayonet drills in over 20 years though.


11 posted on 03/16/2010 11:34:31 AM PDT by Sarajevo (You're jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

No, still coed training. Many, many differences, and the Marines are better trained, and of course, more feared.

Recruits are desk weenies. Our schools no longer have physical ed, unless you play on a team. Everyone else thinks they join the Army of One, to run a tank from a keyboard. But in the real world, they are not prepared for combat. Biggest reason for turn down of recruits is out of shape and overweight. At least it is for the Marines. Ask Michelle Obama LOL.

This training change is being recommended by “current” vets, so we are training for the last war, as always, and also, wrong. Also, we are adjusting training for PC reasons of females in units.
Should do both, endurance, and sprints. How can you zig zag sprint if you have no endurance, short or long term. Sure to cause a lot of physiology comments, but it remains a fact. Run one 100 yd. sprint, and then drop from exhaustion, get killed by a muzzie who can outrun any of us, uphill in high altitude. Great decision.


12 posted on 03/16/2010 11:35:37 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WOBBLY BOB

Bingo. Marines, Semper Fi!


13 posted on 03/16/2010 11:36:15 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John S Mosby
I heard an ex-Marine say once "As long as I've got a round in the chamber, there ain't gonna be any bayonet fight."

Just sayin'.

14 posted on 03/16/2010 11:37:21 AM PDT by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: greatdefender
A colleague of mine posted an article on this subject back in July 2008...
Is the Army adopting a Crossfit-style PT program?

15 posted on 03/16/2010 11:37:48 AM PDT by SonOfDarkSkies (I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself... - D.H. Lawrence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

Several instances in Viet Nam when bayonets featured prominently in defense of perimeter. Needs to be taught, close order weaponry use. Not quite like training with sabers for horseback.


16 posted on 03/16/2010 11:39:01 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner

And when there isn’t?


17 posted on 03/16/2010 11:40:04 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner

Agree with him, but they also left the bayonet fixed, cause it has a hole for the bullet to go through. Also, works real good when used together, thrust, boom.


18 posted on 03/16/2010 11:40:19 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: John S Mosby

Did you even read the article or did you just get too excited and reach for your pom poms.

Here is another more thoughtful thread on the same article.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2471973/posts


19 posted on 03/16/2010 11:51:08 AM PDT by ansel12 (Social liberal politicians in the GOP are easy for the left to turn, why is that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?17159-Brits-kill-35-in-bayonet-charge


20 posted on 03/16/2010 11:52:30 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson