Posted on 08/12/2011 4:38:43 AM PDT by RobinMasters
A little more on SS# area codes:
Area numbers - The first three numbers originally represented the state in which a person first applied for a Social Security card. Numbers started in the northeast and moved westward. This meant that people on the east coast had the lowest numbers and those on the west coast had the highest. Since 1972, the SSA has assigned numbers and issued cards based on the ZIP code in the mailing address provided on the original application form. Since the applicant’s mailing address doesn’t have to be the same as his residence, his area number doesn’t necessarily represent the state in which he resides. For many of us who received our SSNs as infants, the area number indicates the state we were born in. You can find out which area numbers go with each state at SSA.gov: Social Security Number Allocations.
http://www.howstuffworks.com/social-security-number.htm/printable
What’s your theory on why Obama applied in Connecticut?
Issued almost 40 years ago, when they weren’t using computers to generate SS numbers. So the “typo” theory wouldn’t come into play then.
Nope.
What number does he use now
Social security numbers of people who are alive, even the president, are not public information.
It does, however, appear that he had a new number assigned to him after his old SSN beginning with 042 was leaked.
Yes. I think it's the only plausible theory that explains why his original SSN started with 042.
Have you got a better theory?
This is the most ‘blatant troll try to cover up Obongo’s lies
I agree that Obama lies (with greater frequency recently), but which of his lies, exactly, do you think I'm trying to cover up?
think you are in full meltdown mode as the poll numbers show your hero is going down in flames.
Actually, the only thing that makes me happier than his current poll numbers are the increasing odds that he will be defeated next year.
I’ll give you a month, tops, before you get the zot...I’ll get to work on your past post when I have time and see if we can get that zot date moved up.
LOL. Knock yourself out. Birthers have been trying to get me banned for 3 years. What did Einstein say about the definition of insanity?
What about it do you find unconvincing?
By the late 1970's, mainframe computers were already commonly used to manage large databases. So yes, the theory does come into play.
If anybody’s trying to get you banned it’s you. The more Obama ramps up his class warfare rhetoric and the harder he tries to inflame the non-producers against the producers, the more you downplay it. He’s behaving like a flaming marxist yet you keep ridiculing those who call a spade a spade. What conservative, at this point, has failed to recognize Obama’s marxist agenda? He’s not a boring socialist; he a marxist wrecking ball. You’re the only poster I’ve met on this site who actively (and arogantly) argues otherwise. Nobody’s forcing you to minimize Obama’s toxic economic underpinnings—you do that all by yourself.
Hahhaha, lmao.
I see the two butt buddies are here teaming up together to dispel the silly notion that oabam's ineligibility is such a conspiracy that they have to show up on every thread to tell us so.
Trolls need to get a real job.
Birthers have been trying to get me banned for 3 years.
_____________________
Define birther and fyi, I have never tried to get you banned or extensively researched your past posts. One thing I can promise you, when I do my search will be thorough, all the way back to the day you joined and I will compile any trollish behavior I see. You may pass the not a troll test, but from what I have seen so far, I doubt it.
So birthers have tried to get you banned for THREE years? does that mean even before the election that you were here defending the big eared Obongo?
If I find anything I’ll be sure and ping you after I check your past posts back to day one because I will post them all right here for all to see.
Out of all of the discrepancies with Obama’s past you’d think this would raise red flags.
Where’s our elected leaders on this subject?
Did you see the video where this guy with a camera was going around asking people if Barack Obama was a Keynesian? Invariably the reply always was, "No, he was born in the United States." :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBrHkxqNT7s
If they had good sense they wouldn't be Liberals.
Yeah, I saw that. You can’t really blame the people, though. They get their info from CNN, AKA the Clearing House of Misinformation and Rank Stupidity. Until we get better main stream sources of information and people make use of them, ignorance will be the rule not the exception.
BD, the party in question went a bit haywire during the debt ceiling debate, and called anyone with a reticence about giving Obama more Big Bucks “morons”. It sure looks like giving Obama anything he wants is a priority with this one. But we weren’t/aren’t supposed to point out that giving an alcoholic a platinum credit card good at any liquor store in the country might not be a great idea...because, you know, we’re just not all that smart while curious is a
wait
for
it
‘economist’.
Big whoop.
I agree with you that it's a "constitutional issue". Don't you think we should make the CONSTITUTION a huge issue in the election? As therein lies the fact that so many of the problems we are facing now are due to not following the constitution.
“It’s a constitutional issue.”
Yep, and I think that Tom Sowell (I am a fan) would agree that having an ineligible usurper occupying the White House in violation of Article II Section I, Clause V of the Constitution is a “Big Effing Deal.” Of course, since we (still) haven’t seen definitive birth documentation on the guy, he could in fact be eligible; it’s then just that every other aspect of his life narrative is shown to be a lie. Somebody’s tag line that I’ve seen on FR went something like “Obama may not be a Natural Born Citizen, but he’s certainly a Natural Born Liar.” Perfect.
However, if the issue comes back to the front burner in the news and gets hot again and if by chance our nominee is asked about it in an interview I think they could make a statement similar to this:
"when I move into the White House the new attorney general will initiate a thorough and complete investigation in order to clarify to the American people that Barack Obama was indeed eligible and was the legitimate President of these United States. I believe that's only fair to not only President Obama who deserves to rid this question of eligibility from history but also the American people who deserve the peace of mind.
However, if by some chance the accusations turn out to be correct, there is a promise that anybody in Congress whether they be republican or democrat will be legally held accountable and justice will be served for any wrong doing and illegal activity. Let that be a warning to the leaders of Congress who have taken the oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America."
This message alone will lift the hair on the back of the necks of those failing to do their job. These leaders have received packages and copies of affidavits so they do know what’s being alleged. These candidates and our congressmen need to know that this is no longer a missing Birth Certificate issue but also possible fraud regarding the social security number(s) of Barack Obama.This message will most likely prompt some to start taking action so that when the new President comes in they will not be caught with their pants down and possibly face jail time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.