Posted on 09/24/2012 12:05:08 PM PDT by FlJoePa
You’re lazy
HAHA...are there any child rapists you support, or is Sandusky and his enablers the only ones?
This ice-cream thing is so funny because everybody is making their own assumptions on how this whole thing transpired.
Was the ice-cream parlor selling a menu item that was called Sandusky that looked like “private parts” before the scandal broke? Then everybody knew.
Did the icecream parlor sell a menu item that did NOT look like private parts, named Sandusky, but was made to look provocative after it was purchased, but before it was consumed. Then that is quite a different story.
At this point, I cant help it. I am off to Baskin Robbins!
You think it’s funny. I think it’s sad. This entire scandal has been like a big game of media “telephone”, where stuff just gets repeated as facts until even intelligent people are gobbling it up.
I will say this. There are numerous law suits in the works, and if/when that report (factfreeh) lands in ANY court, it will be torn to pieces like no document you’ve ever seen.
I would assume the first time the document will see court will be if someone can get the ncaa on sanctions/win vacation. Just my opinion
I also believe strongly that ALL charges against Curley and Schultz will be dismissed...but, not until PSU settles with mcqueary, where there will no doubt be a strict confidentiality agreement.
That University is on fire right now between alumni and the b.o.t. and president (who was the one that actually signed off on sandusky’s emeritus status). Football games are a distraction at this point.
Peetz (BNY Mellon), Surma (US Steel) and the corrupt governor Corbett are running this University, and alums are not happy with the way they have handled things. Their own connections to the second mile are what is being covered up here. Not some out of control Football Program.
PA Ping!
If you want on/off the PA Ping List, please freepmail me. Thanks!
I should also add Kenneth Frazier (Merck), another “move along” b.o.t. member to the mix. He had more ties to the second mile than Joe Paterno could have in a hundred lifetimes, but that doesn’t fit the media narrative. The truth will come out.
Thanks for the ping.
Interesting article. It’s s shame that people cannot see the reason through their emotions. It just bugs me that people are out to tar and feather Penn State at the very least. Sandusky had his day in court and the jury has spoken, that is good enough for me.
<>This monster (Sandusky) repeatedly molested—and in some cases raped—young boys who trusted him. And another monster did nothing, knowing full-well that all was not right with the former defensive end.<>
Are you referring to Louis Freeh???
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2928292/posts
“A copy of a document sent to me by a source and dated February 28,2000 ( a link is provided at the bottom) and further corroborated by other documentation has revealed that MBNA bank beginning in 2000 and throughout the entire tenure of Louis Freeh as the bank’s vice chairman and general counsel, was a major corporate sponsor of Jerry Sandusky and Second Mile and continued to be throughout Freeh’s tenure at the bank from 2001 to 2006 when MBNA bank was bought by Bank of America for $35 billion. Freeh at the time cashed in $20 million in stock options.”
No wonder Louis Freeh’s hatchetjob led everyone away from the Second Mile and its activity during this time. It would have pointed to him and the man who hired him to do the hatchetjob.
I always wondered about that. How did the owner know about Sandusky's proclivities???
Was it just rumor or more than that??? If it was more than that, then why didn't the owner of the ice cream parlor go to the police???
Why wasn't he atleast interviewed by Louis Freeh???
Then don't get mad at FR people for something that the alums should be upset with but apparently are not -- atleast not enough. This is a matter that the alums need to get behind and fix.
That said anyone who thinks Joe Paterno is guilty of some offense here has not read the Freehdumb Report. Just before Freeh accuses Paterno on no evidence at all, he admits that he did the right thing and went above and beyond what was required when this matter was brought to him. Paterno never wanted Sandusky bringing his 2nd Mile kids to the football facilities and after the incident it all stopped. What more was he supposed to do???
BTW read McQueary's multiple conflicting statements about what he allegedly saw and you will understand why Curley and Schultz did not go directly to DPW, and why they will likely be acquitted of any wrongdoing.
Also read Pennsylvania Law -- the responsibility for reporting this incident to DPW fell upon the executive director of the Second Mile, Dr Raykowitz, noted child psychologist who was clearly notified of Sandusky's shower incident.
Before accepting $6 million to write this hatchetjob Freeh should have admitted that he knew Dr Raykowitz from his years as VP and co-counsel at MBNA Bank that sponsored Sandusky Second Mile events. Can you smell conflict of interest???
One last note that few on this forum know. When it went to trial, the jury found Sandusky not guilty of child molestation in the shower incident. McQeary's Grand Jury testimony turned out to have been altered by the Attorney General and when given under oath it fell short of child molestation and closer to child's play per the jury.
Louis Freeh knew this before writing his report but just happened to omit it like he omitted other pertinent facts. It didn't fit his $6 million dollar narrative.
Can you smell Freeh fraud??? Why would anybody who knew him to expect anything other than fraud from him???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.