Posted on 05/20/2013 10:14:07 AM PDT by Kevmo
It was, for a previous Rossi "test".
To yield the needed energy, the H2O2 would need to be very concentrated
For the Rossi test, drugstore concentrations were well over the needed concentration.
Hopefully it's true this time, unlike the last time I ridiculed, and disproved, that claim.
Wow, yet another prediction fail by you.
Only you would consider requests for details, stating facts, and asking you to defend your claims, stirring discord and trying to get the thread pulled.
You remind me of Obama saying that Democracy is messy.
I hope the mods take notice of your attempts to stir discord to the point of having this thread removed.
Thanks 4 Bumping The Thread T4BTT
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2965392/posts?page=19#19
I hope the mods take notice of your attempts to stir discord to the point of having this thread removed.
Thanks 4 Bumping The Thread T4BTT
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2965392/posts?page=19#19
I hope the mods take notice of your attempts to stir discord to the point of having this thread removed.
Thanks 4 Bumping The Thread T4BTT
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2965392/posts?page=19#19
Only you would consider requests for details, stating facts, and asking you to defend your claims, stirring discord and trying to get the thread pulled
***The mods beg to differ. That’s why they pull threads.
Gee, it’s a fascination why the mods allow such obvious flamebait posts.
The mods pull your threads when you start calling names.
They pull threads when you start whining to them. Why is it that using a noun, name-calling, is frowned upon, but your use of adverbs and adjectives in the same fashion is acceptable? Because one of the mods agreed with you.
Thanks for bumping the thread.
Maybe even you can get such a historical development as this removed from FR discourse. Maybe not. But your damage is done, throughout the entire exchange. Now that independent evidence comes in to validate what I’ve been saying, how does your incredible level of hyper-skepticism benefit FR?
Then the difference in energy input, if any, would be equivalent to the net energy produced by the reaction.
This “report” isn’t evidence, and your claim of independence is without merit. There is nothing historic or particularly unusual about your continued promotion of con-artist Rossi.
You’re boring AND you’re clueless. You don’t have the faintest grasp of physics - obviously - so all you can do is insult those you have sufficient comprehension to know a scam when they see one. Like I said put your money where your mouth is. Prove the sceptics wrong.
I'm a chemist and well acquainted with the energy density of H2O2. Post your source.
How do we know you're a chemist? You don't act like one.
I haven’t a clue about Physics? Bwahahahaha, go get your diaper changed, you’re satrting to stink up the place. And just to help you get a handle on ‘things’, oil is not the future energy base for humanity and Pons & Fleishman have been vindicated. Now go read about Steven Jones as your homework assignment. You’ll need to reach back into the eighties for the full story on Jones.
DO NOT POST TO ME. You have nothing to say that I have any interest in.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.