We use to get cold fusion reactions all the time back in the late 80s at Purdue university. Some cheap beer, bag of white castles and a lot can fuse on a cold Indiana night...
So this is your contribution to a scientific thread — derision? How does that further scientific knowledge? It doesn’t. How is it that the PTBs say that such behavior doesn’t qualify as anti-science?
Here’s the basics: A Freeper logs onto a thread, talks about some scientific aspect of it, and tries to further the knowledge available. A different freeper logs onto the same thread and spreads insults, derision, and stuff that comes out the back end of a bull. Which of these 2 freepers is legitimately pro-science? Which one is Anti-science?
Are you jokers here to deride other Freepers’ comments or to further scientific knowledge?