Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Swirls in the Afterglow of the Big Bang Could Set Stage for Major Discovery
ScienceMag.org ^ | 7/25/13 | Adrian Cho

Posted on 07/28/2013 9:51:58 PM PDT by LibWhacker

Scientists have spotted swirling patterns in the radiation lingering from the big bang, the so-called cosmic microwave background (CMB). The observation itself isn't Earth-shaking, as researchers know that these particular swirls or "B-modes" originated in conventional astrophysics, but the result suggests that scientists are closing in on a much bigger prize: B-modes spawned by gravity waves that rippled through the infant universe. That observation would give them a direct peek into the cosmos' first fraction of a second and possibly shed light on how it all began.

"I see it as a big step forward," says Charles Bennett, a cosmologist at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, who was not involved in the work. "I take it as a hopeful sign that we can get to the gravitational-wave signal."

Since it was discovered in 1965, the CMB has proved a font of information for cosmologists. In 1992, NASA Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) probe measured the spectrum of the radiation, which has cooled as the universe expanded, and found that it had the characteristics that one would expect if the universe had been born in a single burst. COBE also detected part-in-100,000 variations in the temperature of the CMB across the sky, which would reveal much about the cosmos.

By 2003, NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) and other experiments had studied those variations statistically and found that they fit a model in which the universe consists of 5% ordinary matter, 24% mysterious dark matter whose gravity binds the galaxies, and 71% bizarre space-stretching dark energy. That standard cosmological model was strongly confirmed earlier this year by the European Space Agency's (ESA's) Planck space probe.

But the CMB may have more information in store. According to the standard cosmology, the temperature variations reflect tiny quantum fluctuations in the newborn universe. These fluctuations were blown up to immense size in the first fraction of a second when the universe doubled and redoubled its size 60 times over in a faster-than-light growth spurt known as inflation. Drawn by gravity, dark and ordinary matter then settled into the fluctuations, seeding galaxies. Inflation may also have left its imprint on the CMB.

The microwaves in the CMB can be polarized like light reflected from the surface of a lake. In a patch of sky, the random polarization pattern can be separated into two superimposed components: B-modes, in which the polarization forms right- or left-handed swirls, and E-modes, in which it does not. Whereas the coalescing of matter in the early universe can produce only E-modes, gravity waves rippling along during inflation should produce B-modes. The intensity of those "primordial" B-modes should reveal the energy density of the universe during inflation and help explain how it happened.

But first scientists must detect B-modes of any kind. That's what the team with the South Pole Telescope (SPT), a 10-meter dish in Antarctica, has done. B-modes can come from "foreground" radiation from within our galaxy, or when the gravity from the vast web of matter that fills the universe distorts the image of E-modes in the CMB. That distortion is called gravitation lensing, and SPT has observed lensing-induced B-modes, says Duncan Hanson, an astrophysicist at McGill University in Montreal, Canada, and lead author on the paper describing the work, which was posted on 22 July to the arXiv preprint server.

Hanson and colleagues began with an external input, a measurement of cosmic infrared radiation from ESA's Herschel space telescope to estimate the distribution of mass in the universe. They then calculated its effect on SPT's own map of the E-modes in a particular patch of sky to predict the lensing-induced B-modes on scales stretching less than a degree. Using this template, they were able tease out B-modes in the data itself. That signal is only 1/100th as strong as the temperature variations. It should be possible to spot the lensing B-modes using only the CMB data, Hanson says, but "we were trying to be very conservative for this first detection, so we chose the analysis with the least sensitivity to instrumental effects."

The observation itself could be very useful, says David Spergel, a cosmologist at Princeton University. Lensing of the images of far-flung galaxies or of the temperature variations in the CMB already provides a probe of distribution of matter in the universe. But lensing of the polarization of CMB should be an even cleaner probe of that distribution, he says.

The result also suggests that scientists may be closing in on B-modes from gravity waves, too. One way to do that would be to subtract the lensing-induced signal to see if there is any signal left over. A more promising tack may be to look for swirls on larger scales, on which the lensing signal should be weaker, Spergel says. A half-dozen ground- and balloon-based experiments are racing to do that, and the new result suggests that they may beat Planck to that goal. "I know from talking to people on the Planck team that they're pushing very hard on this," Spergel says. "They hear footsteps."

Planck isn't designed to hunt for B-modes so it may be a long shot to make that discovery anyway, Bennett says. Moreover, he notes, theory does not predict how strong the primordial B-modes should be: "We really don't know how small the inflationary signal is, so we may not be able to get there from here." Still, Bennett says, the signal could be far stronger than expected—in which case it could show up in a few months when Planck releases more data.



TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: afterglow; background; bigbang; cosmic; cosomology; microwave; planck; polarization; radiation; swirls

1 posted on 07/28/2013 9:51:58 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

“Why is there gravity?”
“Because.”

“How come I am not thrown into space by the centrifugal force of the spinning earth?”
“Gravity.”

“What is gravity?”
“It’s what keeps you from being thrown into space by the centrifugal force of the spinning earth.”

“Why is ther gravity?”
“Because.”


2 posted on 07/28/2013 10:05:18 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love ~ Albert Einstein


3 posted on 07/28/2013 10:13:01 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Is it possible that they are reading to much into to little for grants sake?


4 posted on 07/28/2013 10:54:17 PM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah, so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9
Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love ~ Albert Einstein

I'm not so sure about that. The gal I married exuded a lot of personal magnetism and somehow I'm the one who lucked out.

5 posted on 07/28/2013 10:57:46 PM PDT by fella ("As it was before Noah, so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hardraade

Oh for G-d’s sake! I am gonna scream.


6 posted on 07/28/2013 11:03:48 PM PDT by MestaMachine (My caps work, You gotta earn them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9
Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love ~ Albert Einstein

Gravitation is the LAW OF ATTRACTION. It is as responsible for holding entire galaxies together as it is for holding two people together, and we understand very little about either one of them.

7 posted on 07/28/2013 11:07:51 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
So.... these B waves. Swirls. To the left or right. (sounds like ice cream to me)

I wonder what they would look like if you could see them.


8 posted on 07/28/2013 11:10:47 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

9 posted on 07/28/2013 11:12:29 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

10 posted on 07/28/2013 11:13:33 PM PDT by Daffynition (Life's short- paddle hard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Do so hyperbolically.


11 posted on 07/28/2013 11:31:42 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

12 posted on 07/29/2013 12:15:16 AM PDT by MestaMachine (My caps work, You gotta earn them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9
Gravitation is not responsible for people falling in love ~ Albert Einstein

If it weren't for gravity, our ancestors would all be floating around in space somewhere. Dating is a lot more difficult without gravity holding you to the same planet. Sex is more difficult without gravity, too.

13 posted on 07/29/2013 12:43:55 AM PDT by AZLiberty (No tag today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

I suppose a Euclidian plane? Contemplating the hyperbolic distance of HL which I suppose is 1 given the orientation.


14 posted on 07/29/2013 1:19:46 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty

>> Sex is more difficult without gravity, too.

That too depends on the orientation, and whether or not the purpose of “sex” is for procreation. For example, and strictly speaking to the benefit of procreating, and assuming you’re a male, what if you’re on the bottom?


15 posted on 07/29/2013 1:25:37 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

“...found that they fit a model in which the universe consists of 5% ordinary matter...”

Another bad model?


16 posted on 07/29/2013 3:23:56 AM PDT by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless, indisputable clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

I can save them a lot of time and money if they’d just listen to me. The Earth and everything else formed because God made it so.


17 posted on 07/29/2013 5:09:45 AM PDT by rfreedom4u (I have a copy of the Constitution! And I'm not afraid to use it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Swirls in the Afterglow of the Big Bang Could Set Stage for Major Discovery

Further research has determined that the swirls are the remnants of the smoke from the Big Cigarette that was smoked immediately after the Big Bang.

18 posted on 07/29/2013 5:20:00 AM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fella

Magnitism would be from the electro-magnetic force as opposed to the gravitic force ;)


19 posted on 07/29/2013 7:03:43 AM PDT by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GreenHornet

You beat me to it and I’m surprised it took 18 posts.


20 posted on 07/29/2013 7:33:24 AM PDT by techcor (leas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson