Posted on 01/14/2015 4:50:45 AM PST by IamConservative
If you have a recently issued credit or debit card, there is a very good chance it has an RFID chip in it that will transmit your card information to any nearby reader. Many of the newer model smartphones are RFID enabled and make it possible for someone standing next to you in line at the grocery store or at the train station to steal your identity and your money.
Just wanted to raise awareness of this risk and create an opportunity to share ideas on how to mitigate this risk.
I disabled the chip in my cards with a 16 gauge finish nail fired through the chip.
We wrap a piece of aluminum foil over the chip-enabled cards. They also make wallets that shield the cards from unintended electronic intrusion.
It is probably even more secure. Europe for years has had a technology called Chip and Pin and that is basically what the new card is. Think marrying the convenience of credit with security of debit (actually more secure).
How did you identify the chip in the card?
If you destroyed the chip that has visible contacts, you just disabled your card after October 2015. After that date, merchants will have to use the chip on the card or they won’t accept your card.
My understanding is that information in the chip is read by a reader (e.g., at the point of sale). Doesn’t shooting a nail through it disable the card making it unusable?
2 words....aluminum foil
I was able to look at my card under a bright light and by moving the card around was able to see the a small bulge. The chip itself is ~1/4" square.
This might be a little easier.
http://www.staples.com/rfid+credit+card+sleeves/directory_rfid+credit+card+sleeves
The last good idea to come from Europe was nearly 400 years ago when a couple of million of their people got into ships and came to America. Since then, pretty much all ideas we have gotten from Europe - including this one - are stupid. The key is included in your sentence above:
“Chip and Pin”
You have to enter a four digit pin at the time you make a purchase. The RFID isn't any more secure than the magenetic stripe - in fact it is LESS secure. And that's the way it is designed to be. People can set up readers at a distance and gather data on exactly where you are going and when. These data will be used for the purposes of marketing and “fine tuning your shopping experience.”
If they made you enter a pin with a magnetic strip card, it would be just as secure. Other than one more way to keep track of people, chip encoded cards are just another way to follow another fools mistake.
The cards still work as a swipe and sign card. I will have to get them replaced in October when chip and pin is implemented.
Not so.
Magnetic strips are relatively easy to duplicate. RFID chips, not so much.
I received one years ago and sent it back. The new cards coming out now have a chip embedded but works differently, along the lines of the European standard.
This guy has RFID and Chip/Pin mixed up.
A few seconds in the microwave will cook the chip.
Not RFID, but Chip. My Chase card has that. Has to be physically inserted into the card reader at the bottom of the reader (most new ones have a slot for this at the bottom), cannot be read remotely, as it's not RFID.
It's exactly like what I have at work to log into my computer/network, in that I have to have something physical (the chip), and know something (the pin), in order for the card to work.
My point is that the increased security is due to making people enter a four digit number. And to the best of my knowledge, ALL of the chips are RFIDS. They are claimed to be reduced sensitivity RFIDs so that supposedly they can't be read from a distance. But if they weren't "RADIO FREQUENCY identification devices", there would have to be contacts on the outside of your card.
Shades of the old cameras positioned for market research to determine how men select razor blades.
Gillette has some explaining to do, says CASPIAN July 21, 2003
Pick up a Gillette product at the store, and you could be photographed and tracked without your knowledge or consent, says CASPIAN (Consumers Against Supermarket Privacy Invasion and Numbering). The consumer group is asking for a complete explanation from Gillette after finding evidence of a Gillette Mach3 retail store spy system.The evidence includes a slide presentation and video that demonstrate a "smart shelf" system fitted with radio frequency identification (RFID) devices. The shelf can sense when RFID tagged Gillette razor blade packages are removed from the shelf and, in response, take pictures of consumers handling them.
And yes, they will want to record how long consumer X is standing in this aisle or that one. Even Amazon likes to track what a consumer who bought product ABC also bought or looked at.
In support of what you are saying, and justifying the ‘paranoia’ ...
Due to my travels and role I have with the gummint as my customer, I have a US gummint-issued “Global Entry” card as well as other credentials that have an RFID chip in them.
They were issued to me *IN* a radio-opaque sleeve, with instructions to keep them there until needed for use.
This good advice comes from DHS and DoD.
While the RFID credit cards are arguably commercially secure, there is little point in enabling nearby readers to freely gain the info that is readily captured.
No need to ruin the chip when the sleeves and the RFID-proof wallet can be purchased at department and hi-tech stores.
http://www.walmart.com/c/kp/rfid-blocking-wallets
for example.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.