Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Interesting list.
1 posted on 03/15/2015 9:19:16 AM PDT by MtnClimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: MtnClimber

6. “You don’t have to like our leaders, but you should respect them”

Respect should be a response to virtue. Ordering the use of initiatory force against people to control them is not virtuous behavior, therefore it is unworthy of respect.

7. “You don’t have to like the president, but you should respect the office of the presidency”

The office of the presidency, like any part of any government, is a violent criminal institution. Violent criminality is unworthy of respect.

8. “Our military”

If the military is “ours,” then “we” should be able to exercise exclusive control over it. But “we” neither command the military nor have the freedom to destroy it. Thus it is not “ours”; it is a tool of the ruling classes used to make it very difficult for citizens to violently overthrow the government, provide a last line of defense for the state in the form of martial law should the citizens succeed in violently overthrowing the government, and present a deterrent to other rulers elsewhere in the world who might seek to take over the state and capture the tax base for themselves.


2 posted on 03/15/2015 9:23:56 AM PDT by joethedrummer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

I’m totally in favor of extremely limited government.

But this list veers darn close to anarchy. If you are totally against government, then things will get more interesting than you might like.


3 posted on 03/15/2015 9:25:12 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The dog days are over /The dog days are done/Can you hear the horses? /'Cause here they come)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Oh I love it when they equate the military, clean* tap water, sewers, and roads to the idea that Obmacare, Welfare, Medicare, and bloated government are totally justified because of those things!

“How can you hate socialism when we have a military and roads”
(that is actual logic I’ve had used on me)

Never mind that water, roads, and sanitation are a local and state responsibility, and national defense is actually spelled out in the constitution.


4 posted on 03/15/2015 9:26:01 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

Bookmark


7 posted on 03/15/2015 9:45:27 AM PDT by publius911 (If you like Obamacare, You'll LOVE ObamaWeb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

I’m trying to agreeing w 50% of the list....

He’s trying too hard.


8 posted on 03/15/2015 9:55:38 AM PDT by G Larry (Russia has all the luck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber
"In a statist society, the laws are a collection of opinions written down by sociopaths - who have managed to either win popularity contests or murder their competitors - and enforced at gunpoint by thugs in costumes."

Punctuated better, this sentence is a classic.

Of course, it's hard to see any way governance could be achieved otherwise. We just aren't removing enough sociopaths from office.

9 posted on 03/15/2015 9:59:36 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves (Heteropatriarchal Capitalist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber
7. “You don’t have to like the president, but you should respect the office of the presidency”

Out of respect, Ronald Reagan wouldn't remove his suit jacket in the Oval Office.

Bill Clinton masturbated in the Oval Office sink.

I refuse to give any more respect to the office of president than does the holder of that office.

11 posted on 03/15/2015 10:08:44 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Falcon 105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber

*


16 posted on 03/15/2015 10:49:45 AM PDT by skinkinthegrass ("Any girl can be glamorous. All you have to do is stand still and look stupid." Hedy Lamarr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MtnClimber
Thus, there is no “we”; there is only you, I, and every other individual person. By the same token, the government does not exist; each person, each building, each gun, etc. exists.

Either this author is woefully ignorant of the concept of a universal (and believes only in particulars), or it's anarchist BS. I vote for the latter.

18 posted on 03/15/2015 4:47:44 PM PDT by RansomOttawa (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson