Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Earth's inner core was formed 1-1.5 billion years ago
Science Daily ^ | 10/7/2015 | University of Liverpool

Posted on 10/11/2015 12:03:37 PM PDT by JimSEA

There have been many estimates for when the earth's inner core was formed, but scientists from the University of Liverpool have used new data which indicates that the Earth's inner core was formed 1 -- 1.5 billion years ago as it "froze" from the surrounding molten iron outer core.

. . . .

In a new study published in Nature, researchers from the University's School of Environmental Sciences analysed magnetic records from ancient igneous rocks and found that there was a sharp increase in the strength of the Earth's magnetic field between 1 and 1.5 billion years ago.

This increased magnetic field is a likely indication of the first occurrence of solid iron at Earth's centre and the point in Earth's history at which the solid inner core first started to "freeze" out from the cooling molten outer core.

(Excerpt) Read more at sciencedaily.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; earth; geology; gps; magneticfield; magneticpole; magnetism; poleshift
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: MUDDOG

We’re all going to die!

Prove me wrong.


21 posted on 10/11/2015 12:56:15 PM PDT by Noumenon (Resistance. Restoration. Retribution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

No, a solid core formed from a molten core.


22 posted on 10/11/2015 12:59:13 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Noumenon

Even if we’ve got a billion years left, we’ve still got the problem of the earth’s magnetic field flipping, although I haven’t heard as much about that on Coast-to-Coast lately.

But that could be because I don’t listen as much. George Noory is no Art Bell.


23 posted on 10/11/2015 1:01:34 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
"...is a likely indication..."

As usual, it's a theory that will be changed by some other study. I've so grown to distrust scientific studies that are often found incorrect.

Here's some examples from some of the greatest minds:
The world is flat;
The Sun revolves around the Earth;
Disease is spread by Satanic forces;
Aids will kill everyone;
Apple pesticides with Alacar were going to kill us;
Ozone hole over the antartica was the end of humankind;
World Population Bomb was going to kill humanity;
The next Ice Age portends the end of humanity;
Higher levels of cholesterol cause heart failure. Now it's saturate fats. No, now it's tri-glycerides;

Drinking a glass of wine a day is good for the heart, but drinking a glass of spirits is not. NOW, drinking any alcohol dilutes the thickness of blood which can cause blood clots;
Jogging is good for the heart. Oops, low impact exercise is now better:
Mars has no liquid water. Uh, now those experts claim Mars has liquid water.
Physicist claim the universe just poofed into existence from the "singularity". They have no idea how the singularity came to be.
Human caused global warming will flood low-lying areas because of melting glaciers and increase the overall temperatures of the planet along with increased hurricanes and such;
Human caused global warming will cause our next Ice Age;

My best example how wrong science can be is the 70's claim there is NO difference between male and female children. They claimed it was all NURTURE vs nature. It was on the cover of Time magazine. Recently, they discover there is a difference in the brain between males and females. Hell, anyone who raised a boy and girl saw the difference when toddlers - too young to influence. Even before this recent study, I saw an experiment back in the late 80's that had the Moms on one side of a short fence (think pingpong net on the ground) and the toddler boys and girls separately responding. The girls would cry when they reach the short fence because they couldn't get to Mom. Most of the boys would try to climb over it to get to Mom.

So now, the ever knowing Phd's tell us that there IS a difference between male and female. Thanks guys for your brilliant studies. I know I'm forgetting quite a few. Feel free to add to the above list where "scientists" were wrong.

24 posted on 10/11/2015 1:02:11 PM PDT by A Navy Vet (An Oath is Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG
this flow of energy should keep the Earth's magnetic field going for another billion years or more.

Ya, except for those brief periods when the magnetic poles flip.

25 posted on 10/11/2015 1:03:55 PM PDT by aimhigh (1 John 3:21)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cyman

Not fair to physical sciences.

If you disagree, you’re free to write Nature a letter setting out your reasoning. But it had better be based on scientific reasoning.

Have you never flown in an airplane? And do you use electricity to light your home? God forbid that you ever need a C-Scan, or must undergo a surgical procedure. These all come from the scientific method you so casually dismiss.

And yes, I meant God too.


26 posted on 10/11/2015 1:13:00 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
"This increased magnetic field is a likely indication of the first occurrence of solid iron at Earth's centre and the point in Earth's history at which the solid inner core first started to "freeze" out from the cooling molten outer core."

Sounds like fusion to me.

27 posted on 10/11/2015 1:15:03 PM PDT by Fhios
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

The only good tree is a dead tree - the kind that give off CO2.


28 posted on 10/11/2015 1:20:05 PM PDT by Paladin2 (my non desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh
Here's an interesting article on the effects of a pole flip:

What if Earth's Magnetic Poles Flip?

It says the atmosphere would still provide protection from most of the sun's radiation, at the earth's surface, but our satellites could get knocked out.

It also cites a theory that the Neanderthals were wiped out by a magnetic field weakening (that didn't get all the way to a flip).

29 posted on 10/11/2015 1:20:20 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

This is all fine and dandy when scientists erroneously assume time is constant. As they always do.

It’s Settled Science™, after all.


30 posted on 10/11/2015 1:39:02 PM PDT by Up Yours Marxists
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

I remember that. It seems like just yesterday.


31 posted on 10/11/2015 1:41:12 PM PDT by ought-six (Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Trees are your friends - they give you the oxygen you breathe, you give them the CO2 they breathe.


32 posted on 10/11/2015 1:56:21 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Just kidding. I have some Black Walnuts that I planted 40 yr ago to chop down and make lumber before I kick off.


33 posted on 10/11/2015 2:00:01 PM PDT by Paladin2 (my non desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
...1.5 billion years ago...

September 3, to be exact.

34 posted on 10/11/2015 2:13:36 PM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet

Okay, you’ve got me. Science is a complete waste of time and always a waste of time. Let’s just get rid of the major discoveries of the 20th century to include:

1905 – Albert Einstein: theory of special relativity, explanation of Brownian motion, and photoelectric effect
1906 – Walther Nernst: Third law of thermodynamics
1907 – Alfred Bertheim: Arsphenamine, the first modern chemotherapeutic agent
1909 – Fritz Haber: Haber Process for industrial production of ammonia
1909 – Robert Andrews Millikan: conducts the Oil drop experiment and determines the charge on an electron
1911 – Ernest Rutherford: Atomic nucleus
1911 – Heike Kamerlingh Onnes: Superconductivity
1912 – Alfred Wegener: Continental drift
1912 – Max von Laue : x-ray diffraction
1913 – Henry Moseley: defined atomic number
1913 – Niels Bohr: Model of the atom
1915 – Albert Einstein: theory of general relativity – also David Hilbert
1915 – Karl Schwarzschild: discovery of the Schwarzschild radius leading to the identification of black holes
1918 – Emmy Noether: Noether’s theorem – conditions under which the conservation laws are valid
1920 – Arthur Eddington: Stellar nucleosynthesis
1922 – Frederick Banting, Charles Best, Bertram Collip, John Macleod: isolation and production of insulin to control diabetes
1924 – Wolfgang Pauli: quantum Pauli exclusion principle
1924 – Edwin Hubble: the discovery that the Milky Way is just one of many galaxies
1925 – Erwin Schrödinger: Schrödinger equation (Quantum mechanics)
1925 – Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin: Discovery of the composition of the Sun and that Hydrogen is the most abundant element in the Universe
1927 – Werner Heisenberg: Uncertainty principle (Quantum mechanics)
1927 – Georges Lemaître: Theory of the Big Bang
1928 – Paul Dirac: Dirac equation (Quantum mechanics)
1929 – Edwin Hubble: Hubble’s law of the expanding universe
1928 – Alexander Fleming: Penicillin, the first beta-lactam antibiotic
1929 – Lars Onsager’s reciprocal relations, a potential fourth law of thermodynamics
1932 – James Chadwick: Discovery of the neutron
1934 – Clive McCay: Calorie restriction extends the maximum lifespan of another species
1938 – Otto Hahn, Lise Meitner and Fritz Strassmann: Nuclear fission
1943 – Oswald Avery proves that DNA is the genetic material of the chromosome
1947 – William Shockley, John Bardeen and Walter Brattain invent the first transistor
1948 – Claude Elwood Shannon: ‘A mathematical theory of communication’ a seminal paper in Information theory.
1948 – Richard Feynman, Julian Schwinger, Sin-Itiro Tomonaga and Freeman Dyson: Quantum electrodynamics
1951 – George Otto Gey propagates first cancer cell line, HeLa
1952 – Jonas Salk: developed and tested first polio vaccine
1953 – Crick and Watson: helical structure of DNA, basis for molecular biology
1963 – Lawrence Morley, Fred Vine, and Drummond Matthews: Paleomagnetic stripes in ocean crust as evidence of plate tectonics (Vine-Matthews-Morley hypothesis).
1964 – Murray Gell-Mann and George Zweig: postulates quarks leading to the standard model
1964 – Arno Penzias and Robert Woodrow Wilson: detection of CMBR providing experimental evidence for the Big Bang
1965 – Leonard Hayflick: normal cells divide only a certain number of times: the Hayflick limit
1967 – Jocelyn Bell Burnell and Antony Hewish discover first pulsar
1983 – Kary Mullis invents the polymerase chain reaction, a key discovery in molecular biology.
1986 – Karl Müller and Johannes Bednorz: Discovery of High-temperature superconductivity
1994 - Andrew Wiles proves Fermat’s Last Theorem
1995 – Michel Mayor and Didier Queloz definitively observe the first extrasolar planet around a main sequence star
1995 - Eric Cornell, Carl Wieman and Wolfgang Ketterle attained the first Bose-Einstein Condensate with atomic gases, so called fifth state of matter at an extremely low temperature.
1997 – Roslin Institute: Dolly the sheep was cloned.
1997 – CDF and DØ experiments at Fermilab: Top quark.
1998 – Supernova Cosmology Project and the High-Z Supernova Search Team: discovery of the accelerated expansion of the Universe / Dark Energy.


35 posted on 10/11/2015 2:25:53 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

Not too sure about it being 1.5 billion years ago, but I do know it was on a Tuesday.


36 posted on 10/11/2015 3:05:54 PM PDT by capt. norm (If you can't make them see the light, let them feel sthe heat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda
He also said trees give off CO2,

I believe this is true at night. Although less than they absorb in the daytime.

37 posted on 10/11/2015 6:36:22 PM PDT by Paradox (Not on the Trump Bandwagon, but I do enjoy the show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

Yes but the way he said it, he meant that is ALL they give off. I forget the context, but it was something like “animals, humans, cars, and plants expel nothing but CO2” oh yes and then he said into “this very thin layer of atmosphere”. Yes, “very thin” which just so happens to be a very thin 5000 trillion metric tons, a very thin 60 miles high, 80 if you count the very last extent. Thin my ass. Imagine a 60 mile deep ocean completely engulfing every square inch of earth. We can no more affect the composition of that than we can piss in the sea and turn it yellow.


38 posted on 10/11/2015 7:01:11 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (B. Hussein Obama: 20 acts of Treason and counting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA

Hillary was wearing those gawd awful capris at the time, too.


39 posted on 10/11/2015 8:16:18 PM PDT by Conservative4Ever (ENOUGH!! Man the pitch forks and torches...let the revolution begin!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson