Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grady twins from horror classic The Shining reveal how movie led to them being shunned...
Daily Telegraph ^ | 10/31/2015 | Ryan Parry, Jon Boon

Posted on 11/01/2015 12:40:54 PM PST by Borges

They reveal how Nicholson, despite his maniacal performance and playboy reputation, acted as a father-figure and mentor for the then 10-year-old girls from London, England. The pair say Nicholson took naps on the floor between scenes to stay in character, talked about missing his daughter Jennifer from his first marriage to Sandra Knight and appeared to be a more devoted family man than his public image ever personified. Lisa, who today is a lawyer and Louise, a published scientist, both 46, also revealed their role in the hit flick did more harm than good to their fledgling acting careers.

They claim they were turned down by a number of acting schools because they’d been in the horror movie.

‘Oh my God, we loved it,’ Louise and Lisa Burns say about their once in a lifetime gig working with Kubrick.

‘Everyday felt like we’d been invited to a very exclusive party and we were the youngest, luckiest people to be there.’

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: cinema; film; gradytwins; heresjohnny; horror; jacknicholson; movies; stanleykubrick; stephenking; theshining
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 11/01/2015 12:40:54 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: discostu

Cool


2 posted on 11/01/2015 12:44:31 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Shelley Duvall was good in her role there, but the best example ever of perfect casting was her portrayal of
Olive Oyl in Popeye.


3 posted on 11/01/2015 12:46:41 PM PST by sparklite2 (All will become clear when it is too late to matter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

They still have that shadowy look beneath the eyes.


4 posted on 11/01/2015 12:49:13 PM PST by CatherineofAragon ("A real conservative will bear the scars...will have been in the trenches fighting."--- Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Not being snarky or disrespectful, I think they are scarier now than back then. I’m sorry (not).


5 posted on 11/01/2015 12:51:24 PM PST by Safetgiver ( Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Safetgiver

I concur!!!


6 posted on 11/01/2015 12:54:49 PM PST by BullDog108 (A Smith & Wesson beats four aces!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Borges
‘Stanley was such a perfectionist and had planned exactly how he was going to pour the blood over us, so our main concern was just staying really, really still. ‘We only had one set of blue dresses, so we had to get it right the first time otherwise the blood would ruin the dresses. ‘I remember that was very challenging for Stanley because he liked to do many takes.’ ‘Those two dresses have since been cleaned and are touring the world, but if you look closely you can still see some blood stains on one of them. ‘We really hated them, they were horrible to wear and quite scratchy. Neither of us were particularly ‘girly’ as kids, so they weren’t our kind of clothes.'


7 posted on 11/01/2015 1:11:47 PM PST by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
I'm glad they survived. Usually things don't end well for child stars.

Seriously creepy movie with relatively little gore.

8 posted on 11/01/2015 1:12:09 PM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges
I love the Trailer.
9 posted on 11/01/2015 1:12:38 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (...â€Ã¢â‚¬Å“!...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BBell
We only had one set of blue dresses

How stupid was that? Why not purchase/produce several?

10 posted on 11/01/2015 1:14:13 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (...â€Ã¢â‚¬Å“!...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Interesting that they spent so much time on the set considering their brief time on screen.


11 posted on 11/01/2015 1:16:24 PM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

They are quite pretty today.

I would not have allowed my child to be in a movie where there is nudity.

I barely ( no pun) remember it being in there, but I do remember it was.


12 posted on 11/01/2015 1:21:38 PM PST by Guenevere (If.the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

Duvall had to do 78 takes during one scene for Kubrick.


13 posted on 11/01/2015 1:28:53 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (I am going to get those guns out of peoples hands. - Hillary Clinton 10/05/2015)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

Insidious is another movie that is creepy without gore, nudity, and having every word with the F word. No doubt one can make a very scary movie without resorting to being extreme graphic. Psycho is another one. Had a hard time to take a shower after watching that movie as a kid. LOL


14 posted on 11/01/2015 1:30:51 PM PST by Patriot Babe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Imagine how the Boys from Brazil must have felt?


15 posted on 11/01/2015 1:31:44 PM PST by NormsRevenge (SEMPER FI!! - Monthly Donors Rock!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Wow. Hope it was worth it.


16 posted on 11/01/2015 1:32:09 PM PST by sparklite2 (All will become clear when it is too late to matter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Safetgiver

That was my initial thought, as well.


17 posted on 11/01/2015 1:35:57 PM PST by Politicalkiddo ("The louder he talked of his honor, the faster we counted our spoons."-Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere
I would not have allowed my child to be in a movie where there is nudity.

I remember no nudity. But I wouldn't let my child portray an ax-murder victim. Nudity pales in comparison to that (no pun intended).

18 posted on 11/01/2015 1:36:40 PM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Talisker; Guenevere

Children aren’t around when nude scenes are filmed.


19 posted on 11/01/2015 1:39:22 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Borges

They were probably better off leaving Hollywood. So many of the child stars wind up broken, twisted and dysfunctional.

I was struck by the careful way Danny, the youngest actor was dealt with. The director knew he was dealing with a 5 year old child, who was deemed as too young to know the full meaning of this storyline. The director made an agreement with the actors not to tell Danny the entire narrative.

In the scene where “Mom” Shelly Duval runs around the house hold both toddler and dagger, I believe she held a doll, not the child. I wonder if directors of today take a child’s age into consideration when describing their character’s role to a child actor.


20 posted on 11/01/2015 1:39:51 PM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson