I never once said not to judge a man on his character- I HAVE been saying right along judge him on his character and NOT on slimy dirty rumors- People have for weeks, and longer than that even making crap up about Ted- they are NOT judging him on true character, they are inventing a fictitious character about him and judging him on that - just today they Falsely accused him of ‘supporting abortion’- in previous days they’ve accused him of not looking sincere- whatever the hell that means- then of ‘looking guilty’ and judgign him on eye movement of all things- This moronic mis characterization is NOT simply judging someone on their true character- it’;s judging them on a fictitious characterization of the person they have already deemed guilty before any evidence has surfaced- you seem to ignore that there’s no hard evidence out here but there sure is plenty of filthy minded conjecture regarding Ted- Amanda and others-
“This moronic mis characterization is NOT simply judging someone on their true character- it’;s judging them on a fictitious characterization of the person they have already deemed guilty before any evidence has surfaced- you seem to ignore that there’s no hard evidence out here but there sure is plenty of filthy minded conjecture regarding Ted- Amanda and others-”
Your own words above contradict your own statements and demonstrate a selective hypocrisy by objecting easily defensible cases while omitting the indefensible cases. Ted Cruz condemned and demanded the firing of Corey Lewandowski for performing his lawful protective duties before discovery, trial, or conviction; yet Ted Cruz and his campaign has demonstrably engaged in what is some highly unethical or perhaps illegal political dirty tricks. You demand proof beyond a reasonable doubt in defense of Cruz, yet subjective allegations and perhaps rumors suffice for opponents of Ted Cruz. It is that kind of apparent hypocrisy which is discrediting what you have to say.