Posted on 04/06/2016 11:46:17 AM PDT by conservativejoy
Yes, because candidates now have to prove a negative in the world of Trumpthink.
YOU have not proven that you don't cheat on or beat your wife or significant other. Also you have not proven you aren't on the DC Madam's list. So you get to proving these things, and after you wasted time trying to rebut them I will think up more negatives (without any evidence on my part) that you have to refute.
I donm’t have to, I am not running for President. My sons didn’t want their mother to enter the race this year.
“You’ve Been Lied To”
An extremely common occurrence when dealing with teddy bares.
Click the link and look at the list.
Well if Lindsey Bruce say’s it’s not true, then it’s not. Ted should sue to clear his good name.
Thanks for posting
Delude yourself if you wish. Trump could be prosecuted right now if the Wisconsin Secretary of states wishes to press charges for electioneering. Trump was caught on tape speaking to voters and shaking hands right outside a polling place in Wisconsin yesterday in violation of state law.
With that non-denial, there is no question you are on the list (<<<< Trump cult thinking)
That software exists. One such product is here.
It took me about 2 minutes to find this site. The author of that screed couldn't be bothered to even do that much, nor could you.
Just wanted to clear the air a bit. :)
Lots of people live in Texas.
As a Trump supporter, I’m actually happy that the DC Madam rumors have proven untrue. I hope the article is accurate. I believe there are other red flags with Cruz that are far more important which fade into the background when juicy rumors surface. Almost all political partisans harbor the hope that a “silver bullet disqualifier” will eliminate the need for the hard work of making an honest case for the merits and shortcomings of candidates.
The truth of these claims will not be known until the 815 names and phone numbers presently under court order are publicly released.
As of today, Cruz’s pal Justice John Roberts has refused to do so.
So now it is up to the lawyer who has said he will release them in the national interest regardless of whether the court allows him permission to do so, proceeds with the release even at some personal peril.
Remember the real reason for the Watergate break in? John Dean’s girl friend was a hooker for the DNC and he wanted to get ride of the evidence. So maybe this is a similar situation???
So what?
Most of the transparently crazy stuff out there is not being pushed by either campaign, but by the invariable wannabe political operatives who swarm around the action and gleefully think they will “help” their preferred candidate. As for Stone, he was fired many moons ago by Trump, who did so publicly after proclaiming that Stone was always wanted to be the story (quoting from memory here). He called him a “Stone cold loser” in an interview with the New Yorker mag. When Trump fired him, Stone responded with one of those “You can’t fire me because I already quit” sort of press releases.
No, the Trump campaign is not behind the latest nonsense.
Thank you for your service. It has been so discouraging to see so many here become willing purveyors of this type of baseless character assassinating sleaze. However, I’m sure some will still protest that it must be true, simply because they do not support Ted Cruz.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.