Posted on 04/06/2016 11:46:17 AM PDT by conservativejoy
Silly rumors are being spread about Ted Cruz with no proof to back them. This time the claims are that Ted Cruz’s name appears on a secret list of clients of a D.C Madam from 30 years ago. Well, that has been 100% DEBUNKED!
The whole thing started when a lawyer who despises Ted Cruz threatened to release a list of “clients” phone records. The lawyer, Montgomery Blair Sibley, actually LOST his license for ridiculous stunts like this.
This is also the same lawyer who challenged Cruz’s eligibility to run for president years ago saying,
” Assuming Cruz is a citizen, and it’s not certain he is, under no circumstances is he a natural-born citizen, because his father was not an American citizen at the time of his birth,”
“It doesn’t matter that he was born in Canada,” Sibley continued, “he would be ineligible to be president if was born on the Washington Monument, as long as he only had one parent who was a citizen.”
It’s safe to say that Sibley has had it out for Ted Cruz for years. Not to mention Sibley is actually mentally unstable. He claims to have software that would trigger a mass release of files within 72 hours to news outlets if he “disappears”. Yeah, THAT sounds like a guy we should believe.
As much as the liberal media, and certain Trump supporters, would love to say this story is true, it isn’t. Ted Cruz’s name does NOT appear on a “client list”.
The list, which the hacking group “Anonymous” claims to have released, doesn’t have any names on it at all, it doesn’t even have valid numbers to connect to Cruz. The ONLY thing the list shows is that someone called a number from Texas! THAT IS IT!
The Trump campaign has been trying to smear Ted Cruz with a sex scandal for weeks with absolutely ZERO proof to back their claims.
The website Cannonfire totally exposes how fraudulent these claims are by pointing out a few problems.
466-madam-call-list-940“Some of the calls do indeed come from Texas. But so what? The list includes calls from all over the country. Why should we believe that the calls came from Ted Cruz? Look at the image (to your left): We do not even have the actual Texas number; all we have are numbers in DC and Maryland that some unknown party in Texas had called.”
So far, the “sex scandal” is a list of calls from somewhere in Texas that have no connection to Ted Cruz whatsoever. I know facts don’t matter to Cruz haters but in this case, they are pretty damn important.
Don’t fall for liberal lies and please do the research before just believing everything you read on the internet.
Yes, because candidates now have to prove a negative in the world of Trumpthink.
YOU have not proven that you don't cheat on or beat your wife or significant other. Also you have not proven you aren't on the DC Madam's list. So you get to proving these things, and after you wasted time trying to rebut them I will think up more negatives (without any evidence on my part) that you have to refute.
I donm’t have to, I am not running for President. My sons didn’t want their mother to enter the race this year.
“You’ve Been Lied To”
An extremely common occurrence when dealing with teddy bares.
Click the link and look at the list.
Well if Lindsey Bruce say’s it’s not true, then it’s not. Ted should sue to clear his good name.
Thanks for posting
Delude yourself if you wish. Trump could be prosecuted right now if the Wisconsin Secretary of states wishes to press charges for electioneering. Trump was caught on tape speaking to voters and shaking hands right outside a polling place in Wisconsin yesterday in violation of state law.
With that non-denial, there is no question you are on the list (<<<< Trump cult thinking)
That software exists. One such product is here.
It took me about 2 minutes to find this site. The author of that screed couldn't be bothered to even do that much, nor could you.
Just wanted to clear the air a bit. :)
Lots of people live in Texas.
As a Trump supporter, I’m actually happy that the DC Madam rumors have proven untrue. I hope the article is accurate. I believe there are other red flags with Cruz that are far more important which fade into the background when juicy rumors surface. Almost all political partisans harbor the hope that a “silver bullet disqualifier” will eliminate the need for the hard work of making an honest case for the merits and shortcomings of candidates.
The truth of these claims will not be known until the 815 names and phone numbers presently under court order are publicly released.
As of today, Cruz’s pal Justice John Roberts has refused to do so.
So now it is up to the lawyer who has said he will release them in the national interest regardless of whether the court allows him permission to do so, proceeds with the release even at some personal peril.
Remember the real reason for the Watergate break in? John Dean’s girl friend was a hooker for the DNC and he wanted to get ride of the evidence. So maybe this is a similar situation???
So what?
Most of the transparently crazy stuff out there is not being pushed by either campaign, but by the invariable wannabe political operatives who swarm around the action and gleefully think they will “help” their preferred candidate. As for Stone, he was fired many moons ago by Trump, who did so publicly after proclaiming that Stone was always wanted to be the story (quoting from memory here). He called him a “Stone cold loser” in an interview with the New Yorker mag. When Trump fired him, Stone responded with one of those “You can’t fire me because I already quit” sort of press releases.
No, the Trump campaign is not behind the latest nonsense.
Thank you for your service. It has been so discouraging to see so many here become willing purveyors of this type of baseless character assassinating sleaze. However, I’m sure some will still protest that it must be true, simply because they do not support Ted Cruz.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.