Posted on 04/15/2016 4:37:45 PM PDT by MtnClimber
Redwood. IMHO the gun stores were forced to sell guns illegally to the cartels so 0 and his DOJ could swoop in, show proof the gun stores sold the weapons illegally, then use the constructed incident to attack our second amendment rights. At the very least be able to ban assualt weapons and high capacity mags. These folks are rotten to the core. If you believe something bad about them it is always worse in real life.
FWIW that is Marco Rubio in the pic at the top of the LameCherry page not Ted Cruz as the text says.
You’re correct.
LameCherry posted Cruz’s photo at the end of the article.
Did you happen to see it?
Yes, I did but it doesn’t match the text or have any other relevance to the story.
The best way I can answer your questions is through this article from the Nation Review: >http://www.nationalreview.com/article/430153/fast-furious-obama-first-scandal
This describes the process created and approved, obviously by the potus as early as 2009 we know of, and that the effect of the weapons has exploded to other areas than where they were originally allowed out of the country and were being used to kill people. And let's face it, the only real way to track an illegal weapon is when it is used. Your concern about high calibers and so called assault weapons, is noted by the one weapon found that would stop a car. And they would have got more or the deal wouldn't be worth their time or money based upon their obvious mistrust of the people in the process. And cartels get the guns and they USE THEM. red
Disestablishmentarian,
Well thought of. But the problem with it all is not who is killing with weapons we gave them, but the killing at all. And the opportunity for the DOJ to clean up the pieces after many are dead makes it look like your government is saving your cookies and protecting you when they are really putting you at risk. I don’t know of any cartel that can be trusted, and it was evidenced with the spreading of the weapons all over the southwest to be used by the many. I believe the liberals were up in arms about a like situation during the Reagan administration called Iran/Contra. I know some about that one and it is still the government passing out weapons for political purposes and costing lives.
red
Red, I do not disagree with you about the morality. I’m just saying to follow the money on these outrageous deals like F&F and the Iran nuke fiasco.
The drug trade is in the $hundreds of $billions per year. It depends upon sharing the wealth with law enforcement and government officials in many nations and on many levels of government. Believe it.
Iran nuke deal is $150 billion . . . gone pfft.
As a businessman, all my alarms go off on inexplicable deals like this. Generally, they become intelligible if you ever find out the payoffs.
Hence my suggestion that Obama and Kerrey bank accounts are going to be SIGNIFICANTLY fattened when this is over.
I am certainly NOT saying Sinaloa cartel is a worthy ally of the U.S.
Thanks for the thoughtful reply. Thirteen hour work day today. I is one whooped pup.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.