Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Can We Save The Sun?
Universe Today ^ | 9/23/16 | Fraser Cain

Posted on 09/25/2016 6:21:25 PM PDT by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: LibWhacker
How Can We Save The Sun?

Repeal entropy.
41 posted on 09/25/2016 8:26:16 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
after a while you would accumulate enough mass to create a supernova. That would be bad.

I tend to agree

42 posted on 09/25/2016 8:27:14 PM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

The Sun: the final frontier.


43 posted on 09/25/2016 9:03:41 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Tax the Sun as women and minority’s mostly effected


44 posted on 09/25/2016 9:07:29 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Since the dawn of time man has sought to destroy the Sun.
45 posted on 09/25/2016 10:36:40 PM PDT by MaxFlint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Maybe it’s on a highly elliptical orbit within the star itself having been captured at some point? That way it would spend only part of the time near the core and the rest farther out where it’s effect is less.

If that were the case, though, the star’s fate is a matter of if the black hole will dissipate faster than it is absorbing matter. If it dissipates, being too small, the star benefits from the relationship because of what stirring of its mass has occurred. If not then the star is ultimately doomed by the parasite now within it.

The test of such a theory might then be if, over time, the dimming effect increased (star doomed) or diminished (star benefits) as neither would seem a likely outcome of an orbiting cloud of stuff.


46 posted on 09/26/2016 6:18:57 AM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Rurudyne

There is some indication that Tabby’s has been dimming at the rate of 0.16 magnitude per century (http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/tabbys-star-weird-star-gets-weirder/).

The discovery of another star similar to Tabby’s so soon after Tabby’s was found may indicate they’ve found another class of stars, in this case, stars with small black holes in them, stirring up the pot and opening a new window on stellar cores that could keep astronomers and physicists busy for some time.

I love the possibilities: primordials on long elliptical orbits, dissipating while outside the star, perhaps fully replenishing themselves when they dive back into it, binary primordials whose link to one another is broken by the star, all happening in every class of star at every stage of evolution, etc.

(Love your tagline!)


47 posted on 09/26/2016 8:29:28 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson