Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hyundai's Self-Driving Ioniq: Amazingly Smart, Can Cause Road Rage
Tom's Guide ^ | Jan 5, 2017 | JOHN R. QUAIN

Posted on 01/06/2017 10:37:05 AM PST by Hostage

I've been testing a new car, but I never actually drove it. That's because it drives itself.

It's the shape of things to come: autonomous vehicles rolling along without human drivers. Hyundai is the latest automaker to take the wraps off of its self-driving technology. For Hyundai, this comes in the form of research versions of the company's new Ioniq.

I rode along with an engineer from Hyundai, recording the journey as we traversed the streets of Las Vegas. The test vehicles, with large "Autonomous" decals emblazoned on the sides, were two Ioniq compact cars, an EV (or electric vehicle) model and a hybrid version. Both will appear early next year in nonautonomous form. A plug-in hybrid version will follow later in the year.

When Can You Get It?

Hyundai says that its autonomous vehicle technology could appear as soon as competing systems already announced from the likes of Ford and GM, who are aiming for the 2020 or 2021 time frame. But the company says it wants the car to be affordable. "It can't be a $20,000 option," said Mark Dipko, director of corporate planning at Hyundai Motor America.

What's unique about Hyundai's self-driving test vehicles is that aside from the special badging, they look like ordinary cars. By contrast, the vehicles that Google and Uber are shepherding down roads have multiple protuberances and insect-like appendages stuck to their roofs. The Hyundai Ioniq hides all of its cameras and sensors, with no apparent reduction in their effectiveness.

Next to the rearview mirror inside the car are four forward-facing video cameras. Two stereo cameras calculate distances and scan for objects and road signs. A single-lens camera looks for red, yellow and green traffic lights (the varying position and angle of traffic lights present a particular challenge). The fourth camera is a Mobileye and TRW system that identifies pedestrians, cars and animals in the car's path.

Hyundai also uses three lidar (light detection and ranging) laser units, one in the center of the car's grill with two additional side-aiming lidar units hidden in the front left and right corners of the vehicle. Additional radar sensors cover side blind spots and the rear view.

Hyundai is currently developing its own software to fuse all this sensor data together along with precision maps produced by another Hyundai subsidiary. All of this information is then used to direct the car's automated systems and steer it safely down the road. (The maps include additional data, such as the curvature of the road ahead and elevation information.)

Here We Go! Slowly...

To start our drive, the engineers input a route into the Ioniq's navigation system. The only hints that there was something different about the car were an emergency shutoff button (should something go wrong with the EV portion of the car) and a second screen protruding from the dash that displayed, in animated form, some of what the car was sensing ahead.

When we came upon a bus, for example, a bus icon appeared on the screen, as did symbols for cyclists, pedestrians and other cars on our drive. These are all for the benefit of drivers, er, passengers, to reassure them that the Ioniq does in fact see what's around it. (In the backseat for demonstration purposes, Hyundai also attached two screens to illustrate what the lidar and other sensors could see in real time.)

What one quickly learns is that the Ioniq autonomous concept car — like other autonomous vehicles — drives like a little old lady, which is to say, very cautiously. The engineers explained to me that the four-door was not allowed to exceed the speed limit, for example, and the car's programming assumes the worst in most situations, such as that a pedestrian moving along a sidewalk might step out into the street at any moment.

The car, at least in this test version, was also programmed to stop about 9 feet short of major crosswalk markings, the better to detect the curbs on the left and right and ensure that errant pedestrians didn't get too close to the front bumper.

One Smooth Chauffeur

Once I became accustomed to the Ioniq's prudent driving habits, I found that it was a remarkably smooth chauffeur and adept at keeping within lane markings. There was no ping-ponging back and forth across the lane as the car followed several sinuous roads. It even managed to recognize the golf-ball-like markings of Las Vegas lanes, which can be particularly difficult for camera systems to detect (versus the more common painted white stripes).

Even in stretches where the markings had been scrubbed off, Hyundai's car maintained its lane and even steered clear of a bike lane (something I noticed other human drivers on the road seemed incapable of doing). The Ioniq also signaled for every turn (again, something human operators around us seemed unable to do).

When a woman stepped off the curb in front of us without looking, the Ioniq stopped smoothly, as if it had been watching her all along (it had been).

Better yet, the car recognized turning traffic in very busy Vegas intersections, avoiding other vehicles and turning right only when the way was clear. When a woman stepped off the curb in front of us without looking, the Ioniq stopped smoothly, as if it had been watching her all along (in fact, it had been). We stopped at red lights, obeyed traffic signs and had a (mostly) uneventful drive.

But autonomous cars still have a lot to learn.

Room for Improvement

Some overly cautious habits were irritating, such as strictly adhering to the speed limit on one empty stretch of road. And the self-driving Ioniq can take rule-following to extremes. At one point, it smoothly turned a corner and then sped up immediately to the maximum speed limit even though the light ahead of us had just turned red, making the sudden acceleration totally unnecessary.

At one intersection with a dedicated right-turn lane and pedestrian island to the left, we encountered our first situation that presented a quandary for the car. A man crossed in front us just as we began to turn right. The Ioniq stopped and the pedestrian made it safely to the concrete island to the left of us, but then the car stubbornly refused to go forward and finish the turn. The engineer explained that the man and some other pedestrians were still standing too close to the curb to our left, and out of an abundance of caution, the car would not go forward until they had moved farther away.

We waved at the gentleman to move further to the left. He waved back with a puzzled look on his face. And then the honking started from someone behind us in gargantuan pickup truck. As the honking became more strident, I suggested that the engineer take over and make the turn, which he did, but not before igniting a minor case of road rage. The pickup driver raced past us to the next stop light and angrily stared at us, apparently not understanding what the large "Autonomous" decal on the side of the car meant.

The only other time during our Las Vegas test ride that the Hyundai engineer had to intervene was when we came upon a truck stopped in the right-hand lane. Our Ioniq began to slow down and was clearly going to stop. However, to the humans in our car, it was obvious the truck was not going to move forward any time soon (the driver had begun putting traffic cones behind his truck). So the Hyundai engineer tapped the turn signal, and the Ioniq made a quick lane change on its own to go around the truck.

Bottom Line

While the fundamental electromechanical systems already exist to create fully autonomous vehicles, Hyundai says there's still a lot of work to do in the industry to determine how such cars should behave. Software can't account for every situation and, as our test drive demonstrated, the mix of robotic and human-controlled vehicles can generate misunderstanding and frustration.

It reminded me of stories about when automobiles first appeared and had a tendency to break down on rutted dirt roads. A common cry from passersby was said to be, "Why don't you get a horse?!" In the future, some people may shout at tardy autonomous cars, "Why don't you get a real driver?!"


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Science
KEYWORDS: cars; driverless
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
I don't know about this. I'm sure it works and all, or will work. But I see freedom diminishing and that's the most troubling thing I see.
1 posted on 01/06/2017 10:37:05 AM PST by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hostage

driverless vehicles should not be allowed on the roads.


2 posted on 01/06/2017 10:42:37 AM PST by exnavy (this tagline under construction, pardon our dust!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

“Open the car door, Hal....”


3 posted on 01/06/2017 10:42:50 AM PST by Paladin2 (No spellcheck. It's too much work to undo the auto wrong word substitution on mobile devices.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

>>I don’t know about this. I’m sure it works and all, or will work. But I see freedom diminishing and that’s the most troubling thing I see. <<

I read an article (here?) the other day that suggested cars as we know them will disappear once they are self-driving. After all, why sit in an unnatural position when you can sleep, watch TV, basically have a man- (or woman-) cave on wheels. Why worry about your commute when you can just get in your vehicle, pull up the covers and just sleep until you get to work, then change (and shower?) in your vehicle.

The author suggested that people are going to have self-driving Winnebagos and live maybe hours from work.

But the “car” as we know it is probably going to disappear in our lifetimes.


4 posted on 01/06/2017 10:46:23 AM PST by freedumb2003 (obozo: not just the worst president in American history - worst *American* in American history (turf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

what hurts me is that when all cars are driverless, and maybe not being allowed to drive will be passed by law in the future, there is absolutely no reason to buy one over the other. Might as well make them all black, like Ford said.


5 posted on 01/06/2017 10:50:12 AM PST by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Self driving cars at the end of the world;

http://www.fox.com/watch/790407235512/7684520448


6 posted on 01/06/2017 10:52:55 AM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

...and the car’s programming assumes the worst in most situations, such as that a pedestrian moving along a sidewalk might step out into the street at any moment.


That right there makes it utterly worthless.


7 posted on 01/06/2017 10:56:04 AM PST by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exnavy
driverless vehicles should not be allowed on the roads.

Given how many bad drivers, accidents and near-accidents I see on the road every day, I'll take my chances with the driverless vehicles - they couldn't possibly be worse.
8 posted on 01/06/2017 10:59:04 AM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: exnavy

driverless vehicles should not be allowed on the roads.


I think something like that will happen, but it will work the other way. That is, some roads will only allow driverless cars. Because they can communicate with each other and the road itself, there would be no need for traffic lights as cars weave around each other in a complicated, but smoothly coreographed dance - in a way that human drivers could not possibly perform.

Eventually, driverless will be the safest and fastest option. It’s inevitable. The real question is regarding when will it get to that point.

I remember when someone said back in the mid-90’s that all successful salesmen would have a cell phone. I didn’t believe it. My position sounds ludicrous, now. It didn’t back then.

Like I used to say to my friends in high school (1970). when they said, “People will never accept that.” My response: “what is true is that THIS GENERATION will never accept that.”

And the world is changing so fast, along with people’s willingness to accept change, that even that is no longer true.


9 posted on 01/06/2017 11:01:31 AM PST by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
I see freedom diminishing

Personal freedom increases as population density decreases. There are fewer rules to follow when you have fewer neighbors to deal with. Self-driving cars and aircraft will enable more people to live farther away from the cities, increasing personal freedom.

10 posted on 01/06/2017 11:02:08 AM PST by Reeses (A journey of a thousand miles begins with a government pat down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

But the “car” as we know it is probably going to disappear in our lifetimes.


I firmly agree, and it had a good run. I LOVE driving my FR-S 75 miles every morning, and again every evening, from and to my office via the twisties of rural KY, but all good things must come to an end.

I think movies like Minority Report, Demolition Man and I Robot have their thumb on the pulse of the future, regarding self driving cars.


11 posted on 01/06/2017 11:07:57 AM PST by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Someone was told me that being autonomous is good but still required human intervention. Driverless cars should not be allowed on the road, I agree. A autonomous car that has a licensed driver in the driver’s seat - I see no reason why this cannot be allowed. This would allow for the monitoring by humans and the intervention when needed. If there is no licensed driver in the driver’s seat the car should not be moving.


12 posted on 01/06/2017 11:10:56 AM PST by zaxtres
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reeses

These “autonomous” cars will only take you where the government says you can go.


13 posted on 01/06/2017 11:14:47 AM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Douglas

I liken the driverless car to the war between the mobile option (laptop/tablet not smartphone) and desktop. We are always going to need the desktop but more and more people are moving towards the mobile option. There have always been, since the invention of the laptop then the tablet, articles proclaiming this will be the year the desktop dies. It’s true desktop usage is way down from its peak and that number continues to dwindle but never quite reaching the “death of the desktop”.

Like this endless war, which is not really a war since most have both mobile and desktop, the driverless car versus the driver in car will also suffer this type of fate.

Let’s face it some people still like to put their hands on the steering wheel and press that pedal to feel the exhilaration of being in control.


14 posted on 01/06/2017 11:19:17 AM PST by zaxtres
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: zaxtres

I agree. And it reminds me of the “Minority Report” paradigm. IN the city, everyone was a passenger in an autonomous vehicle designed specifically for those transportation surfaces. But on his trip to a house by the coast, he was driving a sporty red Infinity.


15 posted on 01/06/2017 11:25:11 AM PST by Mr. Douglas (Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: exnavy

gargantuan pickups driven by assholes shouldn’t be either.


16 posted on 01/06/2017 11:32:46 AM PST by RitchieAprile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Very Interesting.


17 posted on 01/06/2017 11:40:01 AM PST by Navy Patriot (America, a Rule of Mob nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reeses

That sounds good and I hope it works like you describe.

But I would like to see a strong law allowing drivers to take control on the open road.


18 posted on 01/06/2017 11:41:34 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Given how many bad drivers, accidents and near-accidents I see on the road every day, I’ll take my chances with the driverless vehicles - they couldn’t possibly be worse.

...

Agreed. It will also mean cheaper taxi service.


19 posted on 01/06/2017 11:42:19 AM PST by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: zaxtres

Sounds good to me. Many cars have cruise control now so the autonomous controls would be an extension of that but with the licensed driver always attentive and ready to take control.

One problem I see is that the autonomous controls might let a licensed driver get bored and fall asleep or lose concentration.


20 posted on 01/06/2017 11:45:22 AM PST by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson