the UN ippc chair stated that global warming was their weapon to destroy Capitalism.
Because climate change doesnt exist?
Science uses the scientific method.
Climate “science” does not use the scientific method.
Any questions?
When the weather is _________ than average, it is proof of the climate change models.
When the _________ ice sheet is __________, it is consistent with models showing climate change.
Never let the truth get in the way of the agenda.
Typo in that title.
They wrote ‘Flawed’ when they should have written ‘Fraud’
Warm globally, cool locally! LOL!
They are so bad because the science doesn’t support their assertion that CO2 levels cause an increase in temperature, so they try to manipulate their models to support that assertion.
“climate change” is a hoax.It is an unsubstantiated mythIt is child abuse to teach these lies.SAVE THE CHILDREN!!!
We need your money up front. You can’t afford the slight chance that we may be wrong.
Mathematically, it’s an equation in too many variables, most of which - the most critical of which - are completely unknown, and can only be plugged with successively lesser degrees of accuracy.
None of the climate models include any variables for natural climate change.
None.
GIGO.
We know why the data is so flawed .. because they have to phony it up in order to make it fit their narrative.
THEY KNOW THE DATA IS PHONY ..!!!!
Excellent article - hold that thought, and thanks for posting!
When the ice sheet advanced, retreated, advanced and finally retreated there were no cars.
Sea levels rose and fell. Humans walked to Great Britain, to Alaska and to Sweden on land bridges, due to lower sea levels.
There were no cars or factories or other man caused calamities then, either.
How do we suppose mother nature did those things, without mankind’s help?
When the ice sheet advanced, retreated, advanced and finally retreated there were no cars.
Sea levels rose and fell. Humans walked to Great Britain, to Alaska and to Sweden on land bridges, due to lower sea levels.
There were no cars or factories or other man caused calamities then, either.
How do we suppose mother nature did those things, without mankind’s help?
[Gina McCarthy, who ran the agency under President Obama, bewailed the danger global warming poses “to all of us who call Earth home,” and said she couldn’t “imagine what additional information [Pruitt] might want from scientists” in order to understand that. ]
How about being able to accurately predict ANYTHING AT ALL using the “theory” ? Past warming periods completely disprove AGW, and none of the predictions of the past 30 years have come true, so calling it “science” is nonsense.
There
Is
No
Science
of
the
Climate
CO2 is the energy/food for the trees and plants of the earth.
No CO2 - no plants/trees
No plants/trees - no Oxygen
No Oxygen - no humans
So, as far as I’m concerned, the LEFT is totally stupid.
If it’s known for sure to be true, we don’t need to spend any money for research then, do we?
No more than the government spends on researching the acceleration due to gravity.