Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers

I think you must have read past important parts of the author’s statements about fire.

Foremost, fire would not be possible on Earth without life, i.e. organic fuels and organic derived oxygen.

Additionally, fire changed the evolution of plant life on Earth, which is the primary energy source for almost all animal life.

Fire has also beneficially altered vast areas of soil, and it affects the mixture of gases in the oceans and the atmosphere.

Before 1800, malnutrition and hypothermia were the second and third leading causes of human death in all previous human history.

So, fire may not be epochal, but it is certainly significant in the history of human survival, and the migration of humans to almost every corner of the Earth.


10 posted on 05/21/2017 3:22:01 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: zeestephen
That's all irrelevant.

No living organism directly utilizes fire as a primary biological energy source.

Mankind uses fire as a tool.

The clickbait framing presented fire as a biological development.

16 posted on 05/21/2017 5:21:42 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson