[BroJoeK]

from the article: "have argued that the transition from non-life to life"

PeterPrinciple: "Spontaneous generation has continually been proven wrong.
Accepted scientific principle.
Life begats life."

Nobody today talks about the old "spontaneous generation", but complex chemistry is seen to evolve naturally and that has lead to much new research.

Beyond Pasteur in 1862 and Miller-Urey 1950s experiments, much more has been learned in recent decades.
So there are any number of new books on this subject and ones I've read include:

[ckilmer]

Hmm Bro. I’m going to have to buy those books.

[PeterPrinciple]

Nobody today talks about the old “spontaneous generation”, but complex chemistry is seen to evolve naturally and that has lead to much new research.

---

Exactly, it was just renamed. It is still trying to prove spontaneous generation.

And yes, new research than continues to prove life begets life. Your so called chemistry is under highly controlled lab conditions that don’t exist in nature. and your chemical reactions independent of multiple systems goes no where.

So tell me why it is so offensive to live with scientific results that life begets life?

Once you accept this result then you can be a real scientist like George Washington Carver:

When I was young, I said to God, ‘God, tell me the mystery of the universe.’ But God answered, ‘That knowledge is for me alone.’ So I said, ‘God, tell me the mystery of the peanut.’ Then God said, ‘Well George, that’s more nearly your size.’ And he told me.