Posted on 10/22/2017 12:22:45 PM PDT by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies
Oswald = Patsy. Connect the Dots.
They were watching and coordinating every move he made, this intensified April-Nov ‘63. His handlers made sure the penniless LHO with no driver’s license or job got exactly where he needed to be for photo ops.
His family lived in the Paine residence (CIA operatives in family). Paine got LHO a job the month before at the TSBD. By direction from the Kennedy SS recon team, his motorcade was changed to pass by the TSBD on 11/18/63.
Lots of fun coincidences already revealed. Connect the Dots.
Too bad old Doc Crenshaw was such a big bullshitter:
“Yet when the New York Times called up Crenshaw in reponse to his book, he backed away from the book’s claims as to how central he was, saying that Hansen and Shaw “took poetic license” on this issue. Crenshaw “admitted . . .that the role he played in Kennedy’s case was minor.”
Doesn’t take a conspiracy theory to acknowledge two facts.
The US government allowed a defector to the Soviet Union who had renounced his US citizenship back into the USA.
The FBI office in Dallas was supposed to be watching Oswald. The had met with him and questioned his Soviet wife.
Thus the US government was directly complicit in the assassination of JFK.
We just don’t know whether this was on purpose or was it just gross negligence?
Don’t make the mistake of debating with someone who has no interest in the subject and less knowledge!
No it wouldn’t.
That only works on white icons.
In November 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald was a former Marine with a record of poor marksmanship who supposedly used a wore out old Italian Carcano carbine with a sloppily mounted scope to make a head-shot on a moving target at 100 yards. At the time, I too was a former Marine, but with a four year record of expert marksmanship, and I've always doubted if I could have made that shot.
Maybe.
But there’s quite a few people out there who are by no means a ‘nut’ who of a different opinion.
You’re not afraid that one of your RINO buddies will get implicated, are you?
What is the title of that book?
Among the “interesting” things that Crenshaw claims are:
The back of Kennedy’s head was blown out, clearly implying a shot from the Grassy Knoll in front of Kennedy.
A small wound in Kennedy’s throat was an entrance wound, proving a shot from the front, and not from the Sniper’s Nest behind Kennedy.
Parkland doctors, knowing there was a conspiracy, have feared to speak out.
The President’s body was altered between Parkland Hospital and the autopsy at Bethesda.
And the most sensational: Lyndon Johnson called the operating room were Oswald was being treated and demanded a confession be extracted from the accused assassin.
I saw him interviewed on TV when the book came out, and the “demand” by this writer was described by the doctor to be more like a bellow. And the writer thinks, beside the opinion that what people witnessed is not valid, that the head was in too much of a mangled state for the doctors to really know where the bullets came from, unless they admitted it came from the rear.
Really, but how much centrality does it take to observe the bullet wounds. Obviously, there would be more than one doctor in attendance.
You are entirely correct, and I probably should know better. But such low hanging fruit.
If the CIA used Lee Harvey Oswald for anything whatsoever prior to November 22, 1963, then that is beyond weird, disturbing, and alarming...
Do you suppose deep state envisioned internet 1990-2017 when they put only a 50yr gag on this?
The cover up is a SS agent riding in the car behind JFK delivered the kill shot to the back of the head when he accidentally discharged his weapon upon standing up in the vehicle after the first shots were fired at the motorcade.
The US government allowed a defector to the Soviet Union who had renounced his US citizenship back into the USA.
The FBI office in Dallas was supposed to be watching Oswald. The had met with him and questioned his Soviet wife.
Thus the US government was directly complicit in the assassination of JFK.
We just don’t know whether this was on purpose or was it just gross negligence?
Hanlon’s Razor suggests mostly the latter. The CIA/FBI do not want the document dump because it makes them look incompetent.
Arlen Spector became a deep state senator.
GHW Bush, and his son, became president.
Howard Hunt was in deep with Nixon.
Oswald got a hardship discharge to take care of his mother then the next day went to Russia
All coincidences? Smells fishy to me.
I want someone to give me just one sane justification for withholding -anything- from 1963.
The only reason for withholding anything at this point is to stop embarrassment and culpability of people like involved in politics, intelligence, and polite society today.
Some of the best witnesses to the mystery have since died of old age and confessed on their deathbeds. That to me weighs heavier than most other known confirmed evidence.
The spook assets in news media carry out what is described as ‘information poisoning’ which puts inadvertent truth disclosures into a maelstrom of disinformation rendering truth as crap conspiracy drivrl. Everybody becomes turned off when a truth is thrown in with a bed of lies. People don’t know what to think which is the aim, to sow doubt and confusion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.