Not me. I used to believe all that conspiracy bs. As the old saying goes “When any two people know anything in Washington it’s a conspiracy’’. The Russians had no use for Oswald. They thought he was a loon. Why would the CIA want anything to do with him? The only ‘’conspiracy’’ to kill JFK was all in the mind of one troubled and angry loner named Lee Harvey Oswald.
So perfectly simple. Since there’s nothing to see, why hide tens of thousands of JFK documents for over half a century.
You can’t have it both ways.
I agree with post 6
“The only ‘’conspiracy’’ to kill JFK was all in the mind of one troubled and angry loner named Lee Harvey Oswald.”
You must have not read the book written by the doctor who attended JFK in Dallas that described the phone call from LBJ.
And you must have supreme faith in government agencies whose inner core and being operate solely by deception.
CIA Operatives are not always the brightest bulbs. Oswald did not live and work in a vacuum. He liked the spook world and was meeting certain CIA good ole boys who had a beer or two with him unofficially just to yak it up. So he got to know a few. Doesn’t mean the agency HQ had designs involving him. It just means he was chummy with a few.
There were some CIA that were hostile to Kennedy. Very plausible Oswald tapped into that and got the idea he could make the assassination a reality. No doubt there was an agent who over a beer would say “someone should take the SOB out” and Oswald thought it was serious.
Because of the Zapruder film, and police audio tapes, it is more probable than not that a 2nd shooter was involved. It doesn’t mean there was a 2nd shooter but the evidence weighs to a 2nd shooter. The Warren Commission was an incompetent body. Many unanswered questions.
What do I believe? Not a damn thing. Do I believe there was a conspiracy? No. Do I believe there was not a conspiracy? No.
Those that claim more than two shooters have greater weight. Those that say it was only Oswald are blowing smoke out their *ss.
Neither group that is ‘sure’ gains my respect because they don’t have enough evidence to be ‘sure’. I respect those that consider the evidence and don’t draw a conclusion. It’s Ok to discuss the evidence and where the evidence points to. It is NOT Ok to jump to any conclusion.
Fixed your statement....