Posted on 03/06/2018 4:42:30 PM PST by lasereye
Exactly. Can’t blame loss of senate seat in Alabama on Trump. Next time try nominating a man who is intelligent, and has charisma. Roy Moore had neither.
Liberals have upped the intensity of their attacks the last couple of days. It is due to Trump’s decision to go after China?
Wasn’t it in Pennsylvania that judges drew new congressional districts that almost ensures a democrat win?
The GOP faithful have decided to let the Dems retake control it appears. This is not on the politicians. It’s on the voters.
The GOP has proven beyond all doubt that its existence serves no purpose.
Sir you are delusional.
Sir, you are a cheese eating surrender monkey. 80+ replies to your gaslighting troll bait post and you can’t be bothered to substantiate defend your position.
There is no chance the Dems take the Senate. All but the laziest and tantruming Never Trumpers like yourself know it.
I guess we’ll have to see how this plays out. I am guessing the rat doing well has more to do with him being a Marine vet who does not come across as a loon than it does with anything POTUS has or hasn’t done.
The GOP-e is so undercutting president Trump. That they’re gonna elect the entire sorozNazi- DNC cabal. Figure obama style dictatorship all over again Fuq the GOP-e!
My position is substantiated by the fact that they keep winning races in deep red districts, like the race in Missouri last month in a district that Trump carried by 30 points.
True to form, people here explained it away by the fact that St. Louis was within 20 miles of the district or something.
What would count as substantiation in your mind? I'm really wondering if after the Democrats take Congress and a bunch of State legislatures and State Houses in November that you'll continue to demand I substantiate my position.
I think you are smoking something..
a new CLF ad turns the tables and accuses Pelosi of supporting “massive Medicare cuts” while arguing that Lamb “won’t protect seniors.” As Republicans learned in the 2016 presidential campaign, the agenda backed by GOP donors doesn’t necessarily jibe with the issues that the GOP rank-and-file cares about—especially in a blue-collar district like this one.
Everybody keeps looking at all their reasons why Trump should be a positive for the midterms. Those accomplishments are already baked in the cake, old news and irrelevant. By November the tax cut and the rest won’t be influencing midterm voting.
Trump isn’t running. The potential problem is turnout, not policy.
Dems and ultra-libs are pissed and will turn out big.
The media will laud Dem candidates to the max and do everything possible to sink R candidates.
Some Trump voters are not really engaged on the state level, and they are unlikely to vote.
I predict Republican turnout will be lackluster. No, I’m predicting it will be lousy.
Can’t say whether the majorities in either house will switch, just saying Dems have the momentum. I don’t like any of this, but there it is.
Scott Adams has the exact opposite view you do, he thinks 18 will be a blood bath for democrats.
He called Trump very early.
Read post 11.
And don’t forget the elitist media wants people to believe the crap they make up. Don’t fall for it.
I’ll have to go listen to that, I’m curious to hear what’s behind his thinking.
On twitter.
Awash in scandal?
Hitlery’s collusion and conspiracy with the Russians was caused by Trump?
Anyone that following this story knows that Hitlery and Obama used the FBI to spy on Trump. Most of the the Dem base doesn’t know what planet they’re on let alone anything about Trump’s “scandals”
The uninformed voters don’t bother with mid-terms.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.