[af_vet_1981]

It was. That was not a comment on any poll. But if you want to say it was then I’m not going to argue the point.

I haven’t commented on any specific polls in this post either. My prediction of a Democrat wave in November is not based on polls.

The article of the thread in which you made the comments was about a poll. Your prediction of a Democrat wave would be consistent with your expectation of a Clinton victory. One could have happened, and the other could still happen.

Why? Because poll after poll after poll — including one released by Quinnipiac University on Monday — suggest that in a four-way race that includes Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson and Green Party nominee Jill Stein, Clinton holds a very narrow lead over Trump. It's a lead more consistent with the other states that we rate toss-ups than the states we rate lean Democratic, which is where we've had Pennsylvania for some time now.

[lasereye]

The article of the thread in which you made the comments was about a poll.

I said if you want to say I was commenting on polls there I won't argue the point. Your point is what exactly? As I said I am not predicting what happens this Nov. based on any poll.

Your prediction of a Democrat wave would be consistent with your expectation of a Clinton victory.

What's that supposed to mean? If I was wrong then, then I must be wrong now?

The point of this discussion is eluding me. Good night.