Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/08/2018 5:43:53 AM PDT by Michael van der Galien
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Michael van der Galien

It’s shameful per twitter’s part. Rush has spoken of this.


2 posted on 04/08/2018 5:48:47 AM PDT by BeadCounter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

Facebook is censoring Diamond and Silk and Chad Prather. As soon as I get all my videos and pictures off Facebook I’m closing my account. Done with them.


3 posted on 04/08/2018 5:50:33 AM PDT by tuffydoodle (A moral wrong cannot be a Civil Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

I see you use FR to post clickbai-, I mean, excerpts to your own stuff. Have you donated this cycle?


4 posted on 04/08/2018 5:51:39 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

In before....
Hey, it is a private business, don’t like it don’t use it.


5 posted on 04/08/2018 5:55:34 AM PDT by itsahoot (Welcome to the New USA where Islam is a religion of peace and Christianity is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

That’s what you get when you allow Silicon Valley to displace American programmers and managers with imported anti-American Open-Borders foreigners.

Why wouldn’t you expect them to stack the deck against patriotic American politicians - who would put Americans first?


6 posted on 04/08/2018 5:57:29 AM PDT by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien; Jim Robinson; humblegunner; 50mm; Vendome; Sean_Anthony
So when you use a member-funded site to daily tease excerpts of your own stuff, but force folks to read the rest at your site because "copyright" (i.e., ads and popups) even though it's your own stuff, isn't that a form of reverse shadow-banning?
8 posted on 04/08/2018 6:03:03 AM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

Good article and congratulations on Drudge covering it!


11 posted on 04/08/2018 6:10:58 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

There is another possibility.And maybe this just shows more about me than a typical person.
Do conservatives have less of a tendency to follow tweets? I have not even tried to find the tweet site to read any. Even though I spend most of my time at work on computers, at home I keep it simple, FR and e-mail. Younger generation which tend to be liberal spend more time on computers and surf more - I think.


15 posted on 04/08/2018 6:27:14 AM PDT by jimfr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

And this is news/activism? LOL


17 posted on 04/08/2018 6:34:31 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien
One part is true - even though I was an rabid anti-Cruzer during the FR primary wars in 2015-16, I love Ted.

I like & retweet most if not all of his tweets that I see, and I follow him on Twitter.

There's also the issue of the Resistance bots, like Ed & "Brain" Krassenbot and their ilk, on Twitter.

There's no way these supposed people spend that amount of time on Twitter.

The bots are paid people - probably GROUPS of paid people, busily Astroturfing Twitter for the Left.

18 posted on 04/08/2018 6:35:57 AM PDT by kiryandil (Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

The DATA WARS actually began when the PEOPLE of the world became ‘citizens’ having presence online.

Efforts to truly understand this have been trampled by the obvious and powerful effects for good. But the undertones are just as powerful and dark, and a battle rages.
WAR.

DURING 2016 when searching via GOOGLE for TED CRUZ, we found CRIMINALITY in CENSORSHIP.

For HRC, it was: run against ANYONE rather than Ted CRUZ.

2 posts explained this ELECTION crime:
IT expert proves nightly for months that a simple google for TED CRUZ was ineffective and only NEGATIVE results -based on scoring algorithms- to SUPRESS actual search results.

TAMPERING WITH PUBLIC PERCEPTION during ELECTIONS. PSYOPS.

Yahoo/all other search engines TED CRUZ search resulted in 100% balanced and THOUSANDS of positive pages/election sites, etc.

WHAT an obvious crime by the leader (GOOG) in data information indexing and presentation.

Luddite Congress too distracted by Payments and bureaucratic malaise to even SEE or UNDERSTAND this obvious CRIME of DATA MANIPULATION and TAMPERING.

They must be brought up to speed NOW, NOW, NOW or the DATA WARS are lost. These jackasss don’t even use AMAZON to order, much less understand databases, programming, and algorithm science.

RULE 1. EVERY ONLINE RESULT PAGE YOU SEE ASSMBLED BY RULE
RULE 2. EVERY ONLINE RESULT PAGE YOU SEE IS FILTERED
RULE 3. EVERY ONLINE RESULT PAGE YOU SEE IS TRUE OR FALSE.
RULE 4. EDUCATE YOURSELF OR BE MANIPULATED

It would be as if your local library removed all 300 books on the Clinton Crime Family; which exposes them and convict them beyond a reasonable doubt with evidence. LOCK THEM UP.

FIGHT THE BATTLE on EVERY FRONT or leave the theater of WAR.

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3421788/posts?page=6#6

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3438603/posts?page=22#22

Text of above 2 posts: to: MarvinStinson GOOGLE

THIS And surprisingly, for the last month, Donald Trump is in the top stories list for GOOGLE NEWS.

While searching GOOGLE NEWS for “Ted Cruz” would only come up with NEGATIVE results; unlike BING or YAHOO, which gave neutral “Ted Cruz” search results all month.

Gee, I really thought GOOGLE was strictly honest search algorithms.

It certainly is a powerful company! Golly Gee Google!

6 posted on ‎4‎/‎17‎/‎2016‎ ‎8‎:‎14‎:‎25‎ ‎AM by foldspace (Barak and Hillary are still not >convicted< criminals...)

SECOND POST

To: Jookos

TED CRUZ MARGINALIZED as well I simply googled “Ted Cruz” each morning from February to May, and it was simply sparse, ALL BAD and ALL NEGATIVE.

Using BING or YAHOO or OTHER meta-data searches resulted in a completely different “FAIR and BALANCED” un-slanted set of search results for “Ted Cruz”.

That seems criminal to me. Just statistical science.

“Those that write the history books...”-type stuff...

22 posted on ‎6‎/‎9‎/‎2016‎ ‎7‎:‎32‎:‎59‎ ‎PM by foldspace (Barak and Hillary are still not >convicted< criminals... Tom Delay is innocent.)

end


19 posted on 04/08/2018 6:36:37 AM PDT by foldspace (Hillary is still not a >convicted< criminal...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

While the left screams about Russian efforts to interfere with out elections, in part using Facebook, they actively support Facebook and Twitter silencing conservative voices.


26 posted on 04/08/2018 6:51:28 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

The human race is a massive collective organism, each one of us part of a neural network, influencing the biases of others (we’re each a neuron with connections to others). Restricting the voices of select people is a massive thought control mechanism. They’re literally shaping what influences people by controlling the messaging.

It is evil.

(You may think my neural network analogy is crazy but it is an accurate description of what is really the “war for your mind” - or soul.)


29 posted on 04/08/2018 7:57:03 AM PDT by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien
Not surprised, but like everyone else, not much we can do about it. Probably unfair to compare Lyn' Ted to anyone else as he is likely one of the most disliked and despised Republicans and has never fully gotten over his Never Trump ways. Can't imagine he'd ever have anything worth re-tweeting unless it is announcement of his resignation from Congress.

I suspect Lyn' Ted is upset because he is behind in whatever few polls are done, he is being incredibly outspent (and is still wasting money sending fund raising appeals to me and likely others who made the mistake of giving him money before Trump entered the race). I'd still like my money back or see it donated to a better cause than Lyn' Ted. In the interim, I get the satisfaction of seeing him spend a couple dollars each week or so sending me spam.

31 posted on 04/08/2018 8:12:23 AM PDT by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

Are we EVER going to get back to normal and knock off all this BS?? The country is in bad enough shape dealing with all the pukes in Congress without giving a darn who posts what and where - twitter or FB or whatever else is deemed “the thing to do” today. Everything posted is meant to get a negative reaction from others and stir up someone and that is just plain insanity. Is this what you want for our kids/grandkids futures? It IS NUTS! I don’t care if it’s the president or anyone else - it’s totally unnecessary. The old “I do it to keep in touch with my grandchildren” doesn’t work!

I’ve had my say...


33 posted on 04/08/2018 8:38:46 AM PDT by Thank You Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

This is a war on conservatism. google, youtube, FB. They control a high percentage of the internet communications and they are banning and deleting conservative speech every day

They must be broken up like standard oil 100 years ago or apply free speech to their subscribers. I proposed FB slit into 3 pages. Social, religious, and political with no limits of the religious and social, but they don’t respond to my messages. If they apply these principles, I don’t care who owns the sights.


38 posted on 04/08/2018 9:02:49 AM PDT by morphing libertarian ( Build Kate's Wall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson