Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster

:: #1468- An anon reposts the infamous 4x BOOM upside down gun post with the words “Dark to light” in it. He then lists four points of BOOM from the NK summit. ::

Another Qproof. The original 4-boom drop was posted before the summit with POTUS telling the media that “it’s a process” and “I don’t think we will sign anything.” Yet, Q now shows us that the “4-Boom agreement” was already written before the summit. Speculation can be made whether Kim and POTUS discussed and agreed to it prior to 6/12 (or, possibly had even signed it?)


44 posted on 06/13/2018 5:32:43 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic, Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Q hinted Trump and Kim Spoke already March 10th, Trump confirmed it in an interview with ABC recently.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3662188/posts?page=960#960


55 posted on 06/13/2018 6:06:38 AM PDT by edzo4 ("Well I truly would be thrilled if all/most of the Q stuff turns out to be real")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel
Yet, Q now shows us that the “4-Boom agreement” was already written before the summit. Speculation can be made whether Kim and POTUS discussed and agreed to it prior to 6/12 (or, possibly had even signed it?)

Donald Trump thinks in terms of business negotiations. Think contract law and contractual practice. Signature commitment, consideration, (down payment, show of good faith) and date for delivery of goods.

Unlike Obama and all previous "negotators, Donald Trump assumed the other side of the desk-the buyer of the goods. Obama, others were all sellers (think bribes, payments for performance)

Of course it was all signed before Trump appeared for meeting with Kim. His business ethic and rules of contracts would not allow him to do otherwise. What was consideration? Big booms (earthquake) in NK prior to Singapore. In lieu of deposit check, Trump said "I know, why don't you blow something up and sign the proffer, give me dates, and I'll show up".

63 posted on 06/13/2018 6:24:33 AM PDT by wayoverontheright (a falling camel attracts many knives.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Here’s a thing that came to me yesterday about the 4 boom gun shaped drop as related to NK. We were all excited about the gun shape. But with the booms about NK, I think it’s significant that the gun is upside down, lying down, putting down arms. Also, the hammer isn’t back. Just $.02 at present but could become part of a Q proof later.


123 posted on 06/13/2018 7:54:00 AM PDT by Wneighbor (Weaponize your cell phone! Call your legislators every week.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Mr. Trump has now turned Saudi Arabia and North Korea into allies in the quest for world peace. He is waging peace as the peacemongers scream obscenities at him. Ironic.


294 posted on 06/13/2018 12:07:42 PM PDT by ichabod1 (If there is to be war, let it begin here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel
Yet, Q now shows us that the “4-Boom agreement” was already written before the summit. Speculation can be made whether Kim and POTUS discussed and agreed to it prior to 6/12 (or, possibly had even signed it?)

I'm absolutely convinced that "the deal" was agreed to prior to the meeting and signing. It had to have been, even if Trump hadn't met with Kim mnoths prior, which I'm also convinced that he did.

Having said that, I'm not totally down with the "4 Boom" theory as proof of Q. If you watch the Trump Singapore press conference, The Donald says that the releasing of the remains of our soldiers/MIA's was a last minute concession by Kim. The Donald explains that he wanted it and asked for it and that Kim, over expectations, readily agreed on the spot.

Now, The Donald could have been bullshitting the press on that point, but he sounded legit and it makes sense. So, that point as a pre-arranged BOOM doesn't really work for me. Not like the 1:07 [marker] proof does.

We can't let EVERY proof stand. We must be careful not to Over-BOOM.

One man's opinion.

Bagster

304 posted on 06/13/2018 12:19:18 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson