Posted on 07/08/2018 6:06:49 PM PDT by MountainWalker
Amul Thapar is my darkhorse pick, too...and perhaps the best of the bunch.
My gut tells me I hope this story is correct.
My gut tells me I hope this story is correct.
Me too.
Cernovich is not well connected to the Trump administration
We will all know tomorrow night
Unless Q tells us in a completely non-cryptic way, I’m good with waiting about 23 more hours
Misogynist here.
I am good with this pick, assuming it’s her.
I get a good vibe from her for some reason.
>>saw a retweet of some leftist a-hole on twitter who said that she “Bought” two black kids..leftists are such vile scum
Leftists are vile scum. No argument there. However that specific statement isn’t exactly wrong. From what I’ve seen on adoptions in Haiti, you basically do pay for the kids. You pay someone to ‘find’ the kids, then pay corrupt officials bribes to get them to the US. What would you call it other than shopping for a kid, and paying for it?
If it’s on Twitter, it must be true!
She has 5 of her own kids and two adopted from Haiti which may or may not be a good thing. Hitlery stole Haitian aid money which may make Barrett go against the Rats, on the other hand Trump called Haiti a shthole which may tick her off about Trump. And yes, I really do not understand why people adopt foreign kids when we got so many here who are up for adoption. Some never get adopted and spend their whole childhood in foster care. Adopting foreign could be a sign she has a lib slant as well
All these supposed leaks....well of course someone will get it right. It's a duh...
Collins and Murkowski are definite no votes.
Donnelly will have to walk the plank to beat her. If he likes the Senate it’s a 49-49 tie, unless they can drag McCain in to vote no and Heitkamp is willing to fall on her sword.
Based on President Trump’s 1st awesome pick for the court I’m not worried about who he choses.
The man keeps his promises.
Actually, every woman on the Supreme Court with the exception of ONE was nominated by a Democrat, and was a radical leftist long before they got to Washington.
There's only been one female justice who was nominated by a Republican -- and she hardly turned into a radical leftist. She already demonstrated a muddied legal mind before she was nominated.
So based on a sample size of ONE, President Trump should never nominate a woman to the U.S. Supreme Court.
/huge sarcasm off/
“SOURCE” ...
what “source”, maybe the guy who runs the floor buffer in the hallways at night?
I am Catholic and I know this Pope sucks. I don’t give a damn what this idiot Pope thinks. Why assume that she or anybody else does?
lol. if you really want to see people getting twisted up over absolutely nothing, go find the blog thread about the republicans willing to “compromise” on the scotus nomination so we don’t lose too many seats in the midterms.
provocative title. utterly devoid of any substance whatsoever in the post. people lose their freaking minds anyway.
funny you say that as I feel the same way. I’m female but tend to think alot of women drift left (although I’m sure they’re are beaucoup red flags to begin with). But, there are exceptions (ie Sarah Palin to name one) and I think this woman is going to remain strongly conservative.
You're also less likely to end up with a crack baby.
>>Wow. You draw that conclusion from exactly one GOP-nominated justice and three dem justices.
Yes, along with the LIST of reasons that she’s a terrible pick.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.