Replies

"She is far from a lib, she was trained by Scilia and she was the only nominee to tell congress bad law should be overturned if it conflicted with our constitution. Just pay attention to who the rats attack the most. (hint Judge Barrett)."

That is a good sign but we need more, a lot more. The worst part of this is all the questions that truly need to be asked are considered off limits. She needs to be asked in an open hearing. When does life begin? Does the 2nd amendment apply to machine guns? If not why? Where does the constitution mandate separation of church and state? If we have the right to private property, how are perpetual property taxes constitutional? If only congress can legislate how is it that bureaucracies can make rules that carry the same weight as laws written by congress and signed by the president? Should bureaucracies be able to make law?

Questions like this is what we need answered to make a decision but we never get any of that base on some BS that the nominee can't say because of the chance of a future case. The it total BS that was made up for the specific reason of enabling leftist radicals to get through a senate confirmation.

The confirmation process is a rigged game.