After a few clips of crying children on the border, you know how she'll rule on immigration issues.
You're also less likely to end up with a crack baby.
She is probably deeply connected to her church and its endeavors-all churches are in on this third world immigration.
However, I don’t believe she will depart from our immigration laws nor the power of the executive branch in this field.
remember a broken clock gets it right once a day-Sandra Day’O’Connor was opposed to the Plyler v. Doe decision
Or maybe she wanted to rescue two children from a shithole country? I run in VERY conservative Christian circles and have close friends who have adopted children from China, South Korea, and Africa. I’ll make sure I chew them out for not adopting American babies the next time I see them.
My husband and I found that out when we were researching adoption.
We ended up adopting a 5-year-old from a Russian orphanage because
(1) We didn't have to go through our County and State Foster System as precondition to adoption --- which we couldn't stomach.
(2) Adopting from Russia, there was no possibility of a birthmother or birthfather making a surprise appearance and trying to bollix things up with some belated legal complication.
(3) There was no question of "open adoption" -- the requirement to be open to involving the birthmother in terms of identifying contact information or ongoing relationship, if she wants that.
Many people don't realize that adoption in the US can be tied up in a hundred legal and regulatory knots.
Not only that: I'm amazed at the people who can't distinguish between cheap, photo-op, hypocritical "virtue-signalling," and genuine "virtue", which is where you engage quietly and sincerely, act generously, and pay up personally.