Posted on 07/10/2018 7:39:44 AM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX
Here is a current readout results of the Drudge Report on-line poll, asking if Hillary Clinton should make another run for POTUS.
- No votes - 215,000 - 66% - Yes votes - 112,000 - 34%
Those results call out a political slaughter of Ms. Clinton, but, they do not relate the entire status of the poll and its devastating, political impact of failure for Ms. Clinton.
The readings of blogs, Twitter and numerous internet posts shows that at least half of the cast yes votes for Ms. Clinton are gleefully cast by voters who wish to see her run once more, so that she can suffer an unheard of Trump defeat, once again. That leaves Ms. Clinton with a sad total of 17% yes votes of fools that wish for her to run for POTUS victory, once more.
Methinks Hillary Clinton is Toast...not really burnt toast. IMHO, She ain't going nowhere, politically. What say you?
“...she might even be nominated!”
Only IF she has to spend her OWN money and I don’t see that happening.
No one has any more money for the Clinton circus reboot
I voted yes because I wanted to see her get beat by Trump again.
Hehe.
That said, I don't think she'll run. Health issues and the law are catching up to her.
>>2) I voted yes because I think Trump wins 45 states if she runs again.<<
45, hell. He wins 57!!
You would have at least three factions fighting
The Clinton faction
The Obama Faction
The Bernie/communist Faction
It is going to get interesting
I hope their 2020 convention is just like their 1924 convention, that would be awesome
Let the Dems waste their money on HER.Maybe that will help spread the wealth around in the GOP.
adlai stevenson!
That’s more true from the 1970s on, but the first nearly seventy years of the century saw William Jennings Bryant, Alai Stevenson, and Richard Nixon receiving their party’s nomination after a losing bid. These three individuals were their party’s nominee in 7 of the first 18 elections from 1900. If you count 1896, it’s 8 of 19.
She has her place in history, as the first woman nominee of a major party; as the first woman nominee with a serious chance of winning the general election.
Hillary will have her place in history, but it’s not the place in history she really wanted.
I may not live long enough, but, would love to see a movie about Hillary and the Clintons, all their machinations behind the scenes, the hubris of Hillary as she sought the presidency, how she felt entitled, etc. But then, to see her fall short of what she felt was her destiny. Would make for a nice Shakespearean story, in my opinion.
I didn’t vote either way. On the one hand, if she did run again, I think she would most likely lose. I don’t think she is physically capable of surviving a campaign without multiple episodes like last time. My feelings of schadenfreude kick in proclaiming, “Run, Hillary, Run”. On the other hand, I don’t think I can stomach two more years of hearing her screeching voice shouting out her disdain for Trump and those Deplorable masses that voted for him. Just imitating her voice just now scared my dog.
I think the poll results on Drudge should be taken with a grain of salt. More conservatives view Drudge than liberals. So that slants the results. However, most in the rat party really have got to be wanting someone different to run - not a two time loser.
She ain’t toast she’s a old slice of stale bread covered with green mold.
Moldy Toast
I know. I voted “yes”.
I agree, but Drudge seems to be moving left at a pretty fast pace.
Me too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
